It’s a confirmation mass. I’m not seeing the issue here. |
So is mental health impact from isolation and unemployment, yet I rarely see that discussed in these threads. |
If you want to discuss studies of the mental health impact of isolation and unemployment, go right ahead. I believe that getting spread down to low levels will help us be able to get together in person more, have friends over indoors for a meal or a sleepover; go to church in person safely and have schools and live on college campuses safely. Just closing our eyes and ignoring COVID spread won't help us get to that point though. I have a severely ill husband and he has been incredibly isolated throughout this all... seeing no one but those who live in our home. We need spread to be very very low for him to be able to receive outside visitors, especially because so many people seem to feel he is expendable. |
Curious what low level spread (in new cases per week per 100k population) would be acceptable to you to do the bolded things you mention? |
| Metrics for ND up today and show continued flattening of the curve. Looking good. |
| Curve is flattening and that is good news. I hope that ND served as an example to other schools opening to not tolerate the departure from the safety protocols. I am glad to see colleges suspending students for this egregious behavior. Let’s hope the kids are woke now about their invincibility. |
Per week? fewer than 7 new cases per week per 100,000. That's 1 new case per day per 100,000 and is the threshold for the "green" level as defined at www.globalepidemics.org. Several states and many counties within those states have been at the green level the past months. However with vacationers and schools reopening we have lost some of the green states. Currently just Vermont is green. Worldwide many countries are at this level, but until spread is controlled in surrounding countries, it will be hard to stay at green unless you impose strict travel restrictions and quarantines. https://globalepidemics.org/key-metrics-for-covid-suppression |
Not enough testing going on, still. And if this is surveillance testing, the percentage is still too high. |
|
How is the “curve flattening”? In the immortal words of Inigo Montoya, “I don’t think that means what you think it means.”
Notre Dame has done 2,071 diagnostic tests since 8/3. 430 have come back positive. Those are pretty much uncontrolled pandemic kind of numbers. 20% of the people who go for a test are positive? You think that’s good? Think about it. 3 weeks ago (assuming ND was not lying) all students coming to campus tested negative. Now 4% of the student population has covid. Will it be “great” next week when they hit 10%? |
you can't base it on a few days, watch what happens in the next 3 weeks. they will be all online in 4 weeks if not sooner. |
ND is slightly up today compared to yesterday. Still not running nearly enough tests. They are way behind many other schools on this--I'm surprised. |
In your dreams, hysteric atheist doomer. Get a life.
|
Consumption of the Precious Blood by congregants has been suspended since February in most parishes around the world. The Eucharist is present in both species, so it is not necessary in order to receive the sacrament. Rest assured, Catholics are not “ drinking wine together with COVID going around?” Well, we might be, but not at Mass, and we don’t share glasses.
|
Nice way to have a debate. Did you type that during commercials of the RNC? I look forward to responding to this post in a few weeks. |
|
So, according to the ND covid webpage - ND is conducting surveillance testing. Students are,apparently, randomly selected to be tested. The report to the ND testing site (stadium), and get tested. Easy.
The problem is that 20 percent of these 2000 random tests are positive. Those are out of control epidemic numbers. |