The FBI has *ARRESTED* a sitting judge in Milwaukee, over allegations it obstructed immigration enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Democrats are all about obstructing immigration enforcement. They see immigration law is something that Republicans want to do, and they want nothing to do with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a federal prosecutor and Republican, no, this will not hold up in court.

The warrant that the arresting agents had was not the correct warrant needed to take custody of Flores-Ruiz. It's ridiculous that they knew he would be in the courtroom that day and arrived with the incorrect warrant. That's sloppy policework and it reflects negatively on the efforts of the Administration.

Once again, as has been said many times here, the correct procedures and paperwork needs to be used when deporting people.

You can either want judges to follow the laws and constitution for all persons in the U.S. or you don't. And if you don't, then you must be perfectly fine when something unjust happens to you or your loved one and the court turns a blind eye. Because we all need to remember, Trump's reign is only for another 3.7 years - and then what happens? What will happen in the U.S. if the next president is a Democrat and they decide to pass sketchy EOs that all MAGA are domestic terrorists and must be deported to Venezuela or El Salvador? Trump is playing a dangerous game of revenge politics, and it is going to backfire when he and the GOP are out of power.

Lol- you are a paralegal at best. You think you kind of know stuff but really you are one job away from managing the drive thru.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are all about obstructing immigration enforcement. They see immigration law is something that Republicans want to do, and they want nothing to do with it.

Thus their approval rating in the low 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are all about obstructing immigration enforcement. They see immigration law is something that Republicans want to do, and they want nothing to do with it.

Thus their approval rating in the low 20s.

How do you explain Trump’s tanking numbers, including on his handling of immigration?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are all about obstructing immigration enforcement. They see immigration law is something that Republicans want to do, and they want nothing to do with it.

Thus their approval rating in the low 20s.

How do you explain Trump’s tanking numbers, including on his handling of immigration?

What if I told you Trump's numbers are still better than Democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are all about obstructing immigration enforcement. They see immigration law is something that Republicans want to do, and they want nothing to do with it.

Republicans are breaking the law

and they put little Pammie on all the news networks to try to gaslight the U.S. public into thinking this is the way it has always been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every federal agent involved in this will be in prison in 3 years.

It’s hard to win the dumbest post on DCUM but you said hold my beer and stepped right up.

DP. Please next to you there is never a dumbest post!

The tide always changes. The Nazi thought they would last for a thousand years and committed horrible crimes. 2-3 years later the Russians were giving the Germans a taste of their own medicine.

Trump and maga are crashing hard- unpopular policies, corruption, incompetency, inexperience and ego. All these agents are in serious legal trouble. The laws and constitution do not apply to Trump but all his underlings and thugs …rule of law will be applied to them.

It's actually as you said, but the roles are reversed. The Biden administration thought it would last another 4 years, or at least have a Democrat in the White House. Didn't work out that way, and now folks are finding out that laws previously ignored are being enforced.

Wow. There is nit much to say to someone who is insane like yourself. Go get help.

[Anonymous]

I hear the plans are to have the judge in arm and leg restraints with a gag. This will really get the sicko magas excited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every federal agent involved in this will be in prison in 3 years.

It’s hard to win the dumbest post on DCUM but you said hold my beer and stepped right up.

DP. Please next to you there is never a dumbest post!

The tide always changes. The Nazi thought they would last for a thousand years and committed horrible crimes. 2-3 years later the Russians were giving the Germans a taste of their own medicine.

Trump and maga are crashing hard- unpopular policies, corruption, incompetency, inexperience and ego. All these agents are in serious legal trouble. The laws and constitution do not apply to Trump but all his underlings and thugs …rule of law will be applied to them.

It's actually as you said, but the roles are reversed. The Biden administration thought it would last another 4 years, or at least have a Democrat in the White House. Didn't work out that way, and now folks are finding out that laws previously ignored are being enforced.

There was absolutely nothing Biden/Harris could have done to stem the flow of immigrants over our southern border because without a bill being passed by Congress, Biden was powerless to do anything at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is a judge immune from an obstruction charge if there’s an articulable case to be made they were obstructing?

Or immune from ANY law, for that matter, by virtue of being a judge?

Could a judge be arrested for DUI? Or assault? Or tax evasion?

If yes, then aren’t those also authoritarianism, too?


Democrats are getting too far out over their skis here on this stuff.

Ok, so you are not getting it. She was arrested for adjudicating a case. Not hiding someone in her basement.

She has been arrested because she broke the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There was absolutely nothing Biden/Harris could have done to stem the flow of immigrants over our southern border because without a bill being passed by Congress, Biden was powerless to do anything at all.

Hey sweetie, does mom know you're on her computer? She isn't going to be happy if she catches you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every federal agent involved in this will be in prison in 3 years.

It’s hard to win the dumbest post on DCUM but you said hold my beer and stepped right up.

DP. Please next to you there is never a dumbest post!

The tide always changes. The Nazi thought they would last for a thousand years and committed horrible crimes. 2-3 years later the Russians were giving the Germans a taste of their own medicine.

Trump and maga are crashing hard- unpopular policies, corruption, incompetency, inexperience and ego. All these agents are in serious legal trouble. The laws and constitution do not apply to Trump but all his underlings and thugs …rule of law will be applied to them.

It's actually as you said, but the roles are reversed. The Biden administration thought it would last another 4 years, or at least have a Democrat in the White House. Didn't work out that way, and now folks are finding out that laws previously ignored are being enforced.

There was absolutely nothing Biden/Harris could have done to stem the flow of immigrants over our southern border because without a bill being passed by Congress, Biden was powerless to do anything at all.

Check your facts, bro. Biden deported more illegals than Trump did during his first term. In fact, he deported the most since 2014.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/19/politics/biden-deportations-report/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is a judge immune from an obstruction charge if there’s an articulable case to be made they were obstructing?

Or immune from ANY law, for that matter, by virtue of being a judge?

Could a judge be arrested for DUI? Or assault? Or tax evasion?

If yes, then aren’t those also authoritarianism, too?


Democrats are getting too far out over their skis here on this stuff.

Ok, so you are not getting it. She was arrested for adjudicating a case. Not hiding someone in her basement.

She has been arrested because she broke the law.

In the U.S., Vlad, we are innocent until proven guilty.

She allegedly broke the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They intended to arrest him after his hearing. That is a reasonable plan. Who knew the judge would sneak him out?
His victims were there to testify.

Should they have arrested him sooner? Doesn't matter.

She did not "sneak him out".

She allowed him to leave through a side door that lead to the hallway where the ICE agents were waiting. They followed him outside of the building and arrested him.

She in no way impeded his arrest.

She may not have wanted him to be arrested in the corridor in front of her courtroom. There may have been other defendants waiting in the hallway.

Don't post Bondi's lies. Wait for the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how this thread seems to have lost all its inertia once details of the judge’s conduct came out, and it turns out she did exactly what posters on page 1 suggested she did. Those posters were attacked of course…

And now this thread is withering on the vine.


That makes me laugh.

There's nothing to say. The judge should not have been arrested. The ICE/DEA/DOJ whichever (there's a lot of lousy reporting) agents were in the wrong.

This is a(nother) black mark for this administration. Do they really think this is going well for them? That this dumb stunt was a good idea? That this is gong to make the judiciary more sympathetic to their dumb legal shenanigans? Does anyone at all in this administration have a brain?

Wrong, PP. you are completely wrong.

And uninformed. Educate yourself, fool.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/d62bd73e-a370-40e4-8d37-3cb70f6fa035.pdf