HARRIS IS SELECTING MARK KELLY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

So Shapiro will not support Harris unless he is on the ticket? Harris should step aside and let him be the top of the ticket if that is the case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

Nj is as much a swing state as PA at this point and Mark Kelly is a NJ native, son of two retired police officers, NASA astronaut, and former military (the U.S. military not Israel’s)

Shapiro may promise PA and Florida and possibly NJ but he is a gamble for the Midwest and Arizona plus his tweet that trans women are women will set people off along with the surveillance stuff.

Kelly doesn’t have that much baggage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

Nj is as much a swing state as PA at this point and Mark Kelly is a NJ native, son of two retired police officers, NASA astronaut, and former military (the U.S. military not Israel’s)

Shapiro may promise PA and Florida and possibly NJ but he is a gamble for the Midwest and Arizona plus his tweet that trans women are women will set people off along with the surveillance stuff.

Kelly doesn’t have that much baggage

What? Florida and NJ are not in play. If either the dems win FL or the repubs win NJ then it's a big time rout.

Kamala's campaign cannot afford to lull themselves into dreaming about Florida. This pick has to stay focused on

1. Pennsylvania and Michigan
2. Wisconsin and Arizona
3. Georgia and Nevada
5. North Carolina, New Jersey, Virginia, Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

Nj is as much a swing state as PA at this point and Mark Kelly is a NJ native, son of two retired police officers, NASA astronaut, and former military (the U.S. military not Israel’s)

Shapiro may promise PA and Florida and possibly NJ but he is a gamble for the Midwest and Arizona plus his tweet that trans women are women will set people off along with the surveillance stuff.

Kelly doesn’t have that much baggage

Shapiro is not relevant at all in Florida. This is not the 1970’s or 1980’s. The population growth in Florida has resulted in Jew making up just 3.1% of the population and 40% voted for Trump last time. Florida is bright red.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

You realize that Gretchen Whitmer is going to help there, right?

All hands on deck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

Both PA and MI are MUST wins.

Nj is as much a swing state as PA at this point and Mark Kelly is a NJ native, son of two retired police officers, NASA astronaut, and former military (the U.S. military not Israel’s)

Shapiro may promise PA and Florida and possibly NJ but he is a gamble for the Midwest and Arizona plus his tweet that trans women are women will set people off along with the surveillance stuff.

Kelly doesn’t have that much baggage

Shapiro is not relevant at all in Florida. This is not the 1970’s or 1980’s. The population growth in Florida has resulted in Jew making up just 3.1% of the population and 40% voted for Trump last time. Florida is bright red.

Cubans destroyed Florida for the Dems. I will never forget their anger at Obama for taking their country off the embargo list even though some admitted it would help them go back to one day visit family. Strangest electorate bunch ever.

They also hate migrants without irony even though they were the original Latin illegal migrant group here. Trump just played their boy Rubio and was racist toward Ted Cruz saying his Cuban dad was a illegal Cuban alien who shot JFK (Trump really said this) and Ted’s wife was ugly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Shapiro argued that peace “will never come” to the Middle East, said Palestinians were incapable of creating their own state and described Palestinians as “too battle-minded.”

He wrote: “Using history as precedent, peace between Arabs and Israelis is virtually impossible and will never come.” He also wrote: “Palestinians will not coexist peacefully…They do not have the capabilities to establish their own homeland and make it successful even with the aid of Israel and the United States. They are too battle-minded to be able to establish a peaceful homeland of their own.”

https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-philadelphia-calls-on-gov-shapiro-to-apologize-for-newly-revealed-racist-anti-palestinian-remarks/

Wow racist much? Shapiro claims he is a former IDF soldier. Is this true? If so what unit did he served with and at what time? Many of the IDF units have long documented history of crimes. Was he stationed in the West Bank? It would be important to know if he was committing crimes against humanity

No, this is yet more disinformation.

“While he was in high school, Josh Shapiro was required to do a service project, which he and several classmates completed through a program that took them to a kibbutz in Israel where he worked on a farm and at a fishery,” Bonder told the outlet, and later confirmed with The Daily Beast.

“The program also included volunteering on service projects on an Israeli army base. At no time was he engaged in any military activities,” Bonder added.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/josh-shapiro-never-served-in-israel-military-spox-confirms

That's the current story. However, that is not what you wrote when he was in college. He said he was a volunteer in the IDF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Shapiro argued that peace “will never come” to the Middle East, said Palestinians were incapable of creating their own state and described Palestinians as “too battle-minded.”

He wrote: “Using history as precedent, peace between Arabs and Israelis is virtually impossible and will never come.” He also wrote: “Palestinians will not coexist peacefully…They do not have the capabilities to establish their own homeland and make it successful even with the aid of Israel and the United States. They are too battle-minded to be able to establish a peaceful homeland of their own.”

https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-philadelphia-calls-on-gov-shapiro-to-apologize-for-newly-revealed-racist-anti-palestinian-remarks/

Wow racist much? Shapiro claims he is a former IDF soldier. Is this true? If so what unit did he served with and at what time? Many of the IDF units have long documented history of crimes. Was he stationed in the West Bank? It would be important to know if he was committing crimes against humanity

No, this is yet more disinformation.

“While he was in high school, Josh Shapiro was required to do a service project, which he and several classmates completed through a program that took them to a kibbutz in Israel where he worked on a farm and at a fishery,” Bonder told the outlet, and later confirmed with The Daily Beast.

“The program also included volunteering on service projects on an Israeli army base. At no time was he engaged in any military activities,” Bonder added.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/josh-shapiro-never-served-in-israel-military-spox-confirms

That's the current story. However, that is not what you wrote when he was in college. He said he was a volunteer in the IDF.

Right, you're telling us his own words aren't true. Why isn't he being honest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is worst saying you were an IDF soldier fighting the Palestinians or lying about it? It is just so wrong on so many levels. Now add in the racist stuff and old josh should just be the top of the ticket because it is going to be all about him for the next two months

This is the stupidest pick ever but when have the Democrats been smart? I the guess it is more important to pick up the settler vote?

Looks like there will be protest in and outside of the convention.

“The settler vote” huh? Don’t you mean the (((settler))) vote?

Thank God idiots like you are only a loud minority. Harris should pick Shapiro to shut this nonsense down.

DP. I am beginning to think you are a Republican mole. Picking him would not shut down anything, it would escalate the dissent. For instance, people like me who believe that Israel need to exist, but after reading what Shapiro wrote about Palestinians would have a hard time casting a vote for more of the same in US support of providing Israel with WMD to be used indiscriminately. There is no daylight between Trump and Shapiro on the issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

.
Beshear is a safer choice than Shapiro at this point. Besides, he might bring both Kentucky and Penstucky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How quickly the tide has turned on Harris. One day ago everyone was positive. Now it is back to calling everyone antisemitic or pro genocide nazis.

Great pick!

It’s all where you hang out. the dirtbag progressive left is doing their level best to ruin this as usual, but the rest of the world is still quite positive about her.

And Megan Thee Stallion is on board so I think we’re good lol[/quote]
Really, that's what you got. The Dems are doomed with this line of analysis. Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

He will lose Dems in Pennsylvania. A lot of stuff is coming out about him. It will make him great for Republicans but repel Democrats.

Tell us more, Great Zoltar!

Him knowingly hire a sexual harasser and the state paying a hefty price for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The race is too close to pick someone who’ll be divisive. Walz or Kelly, please.

+1

Seriously if someone is causing this much infighting it's not worth it. Not this time.

Let's just go for the easy 2 points folks no sense in shooting airballs trying to look fancy going for a 3

The counter to that is, what if he can deliver PA

I'm still a Walz-head myself, with Kelly my second pick. But I have also come to realize my instincts aren't infallible. If the Very Smart People Who Know More Than I Do think Shapiro is the biggest asset, I take them seriously.

But yeah I do worry about him opening up this painful point of schism in our party, when we're otherwise at a moment of astonishing unity.

There's no guarantee he can deliver PA. He's not as well liked there as many here want to believe.

And if we get PA but loose 3 or 4 other states isn't it worth it

Oh, come on. I think he might possibly lose us Michigan but nobody thinks that it will make much much of a difference in other states, except Pennsylvania. which has more electoral votes..

It’s not a belief that he’s well liked in Pennsylvania, it’s a fact. He has a very high approval rating. My friend from Pennsylvania says she sees his signs out in red country where she never sees Democrats supported. If he can help peel off Republicans who are sick of Trump, all the better!

So Shapiro will not support Harris unless he is on the ticket? Harris should step aside and let him be the top of the ticket if that is the case

She should step aside and let anyone at the top of the ticket if she doesn’t want to get Trump elected. Bungled by the DNC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Shapiro argued that peace “will never come” to the Middle East, said Palestinians were incapable of creating their own state and described Palestinians as “too battle-minded.”

He wrote: “Using history as precedent, peace between Arabs and Israelis is virtually impossible and will never come.” He also wrote: “Palestinians will not coexist peacefully…They do not have the capabilities to establish their own homeland and make it successful even with the aid of Israel and the United States. They are too battle-minded to be able to establish a peaceful homeland of their own.”

https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-philadelphia-calls-on-gov-shapiro-to-apologize-for-newly-revealed-racist-anti-palestinian-remarks/

Wow racist much? Shapiro claims he is a former IDF soldier. Is this true? If so what unit did he served with and at what time? Many of the IDF units have long documented history of crimes. Was he stationed in the West Bank? It would be important to know if he was committing crimes against humanity

No, this is yet more disinformation.

“While he was in high school, Josh Shapiro was required to do a service project, which he and several classmates completed through a program that took them to a kibbutz in Israel where he worked on a farm and at a fishery,” Bonder told the outlet, and later confirmed with The Daily Beast.

“The program also included volunteering on service projects on an Israeli army base. At no time was he engaged in any military activities,” Bonder added.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/josh-shapiro-never-served-in-israel-military-spox-confirms

That's the current story. However, that is not what you wrote when he was in college. He said he was a volunteer in the IDF.

He did write he was a volunteer in the IDF, and it was on his Wikipedia page even as of today. But now, mysteriously, it is no longer there. Thoughts on why it was scrubbed?