Well it would have been meeting her more than halfway had he actually settled in the UK. With dual citizenship, hard to see how it won't ultimately be a joint custody agreement with time in each country. |
How do you figure? They are a dual citizen couple. They lived in the US for 3 years while Sophie had two kids. Then they moved to the UK. They are rich and famous, no one said they were going to live there forever. Perhaps Sophie wanted to make sure that the kids spent substantial time in the UK as children so that they could be connected to that part of their heritage (and develop accents). So they could feel British. But there's no reason this couple could not have split time in both places, and there's no indication that Sophie was saying they had to move to the UK and never leave. Why does her sacrifice in living in the US for three years, having her kids here, somehow not count for you, but then her expectation that Joe be willing to do the same for her is somehow a huge ask? Her 3 years in the US don't count, but he spends a few months in the UK and apparently that's an undue burden? He married and English woman. |
DP - they BOTH chose to marry and have kids with a citizen from another country. That's on both of them. Sad for the kids, who will end up the losers in this, no matter how it shakes out (and I side mostly with Sophie, but that is in part because I think small kids belong with their mother, even if that's not palatable to say out loud in 2023). |
They didn’t enroll her in school. I think the article said they had talked about where to enroll her. |
I'm with you on this, though I also don't think we know enough details here. I'm disturbed by the allegation that Joe might have left the UK with the kids without Sophie's permission, or under false pretenses. Agree they both decided to marry and have kids with someone from another country, but there are some baseline things you DO NOT DO in that situation no matter what is going on in the marriage. One of them is leaving the country with the kids if the other parent doesn't know or doesn't want you to (note that Sophie didn't take the kids to the UK -- she went on her own when she started filming and then Joe came over with the kids to join her -- so definitely two parent consent there). Sophie is also alleging that Joe was supposed to bring the kids to the UK and didn't, violating a previously-agreed upon custody arrangement. If you are getting divorce, you follow the custody arrangement, especially if the parents are living in different places. Otherwise it looks like you are trying to deny your ex access to the kids. And finally she's alleging he's withholding the passports. Again, since Joe has travelled internationally with the kids several times, obviously Sophie has not tried to restrict the kids' location in the same way. What would we all be saying if Sophie had withheld the passports from Joe when he left the UK over the summer? That's just some shady $hit right there. They both have to deal with the obvious mistake they made to marry someone from another country and have kids together, but it really sounds like Joe is behaving like a Grade A a$$hole, and using the kids as emotional footballs, and Sophie is not. Team Sophie on this one, for sure. |
The filing itself (quoted in the NBC link upthread) states that "the older child is attending school" in England. So at least according to Sophie's filing, the child is already enrolled and has attended school. I guess she could be lying, but that would be idiotic because it would be so easily disproven. So I am inclined to assume it's the truth that Willa attended a preschool in the UK in the spring/summer while she was there. |
The kid’s primary residence is already the UK. He brought them on a trip to the US to go on tour — meaning multiple cities and zero ties. The children’s home was always the UK. This is such a sleazy move to get a leg up in the divorce. |
Don't think this is true. Weren't they in Miami for a few years? Definitely complicated. |
Yes. But they sold their house there in 2022. Unclear to me that Florida even has jurisdiction in this case if the kids subsequently lived in the US & went on tour unless Joe Jonas has another residence there. Interesting that Sophie filed in NYC. I would guess she's disputing Florida even has jurisdiction. I'm sure he filed there because it was the last place in the US they permanently resided... but if that really ended in 2022, he has a problem. |
Sorry, subsequently lived in the *UK* and then went on tour in the US... |
The children’s residence of the preceding six months is considered the default jurisdictions. As people have clarified the situation, it certainly sounds like that was the UK and that they were just visiting Dad on his tour which doesn’t count as establishing residency.
I’m team Sophie either way, because as other posters have asserted, very young kids belong with mom unless she is somehow unfit. I don’t think there is anything wrong with this position even in 2023, because in the vast majority of cases mom is primary caregiver. |
Sophie’s petition said that they moved to the UK in April 2023. Her kids were back here with Joe over the summer for a tour. They weren’t in England for more than a couple of months so it’s a complicated case. |
According to Sophie's filing, the last time the girls stayed in the Miami house was March 10, 2023, and she and Joe entered a contract to sell the Miami property on or about April 16, 2023. So 2023, not 2022. She does say that Joe was wrong in his divorce filing to say that the kids have resided in Florida for the last six months. She filed in NYC because that is where the kids currently are with her. |
Yeah but they didn’t establish residence in the UK either since they were only there for a few months in the spring. Miami is the last place they technically did have a residence by legal definition. |
It is a reference to a famous fraud who got caught and claimed she was educated in Spain and the US. That their vacations weren’t vacations but actually living and doing to school there. It was a big fat lie. |