Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only sane person in the video is the guy in scrubs.

Whose immediate response was to defend the screaming/crying lady and suggest the guy just give her the bike.

because she was on it and trying to rent it while being physically blocked. The lady just worked a shift, FFS let her go home. Young healthy kids can walk or get a different bike.

If shes that tired then why wouldn’t she just catch an Uber. FFS a pregnant tired woman can get an Uber.

So now her crime is not getting an Uber when another person decided to take the bike she was sitting on?

Ok.

So you’re tired and pregnant and decide to get into an altercation about a bike?

Ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is she fake crying, if she wants to be taken seriously?

Yes why is this victim not responding more gracefully to these bullies?

Why is that bully crying and screaming? While the victims try to calmly speak with her.

Why are they refusing to let her scan the bike she’s on? Explain.

Why is she refusing to get off the bike they scanned? Explain.

They scanned it after she was already on it. Literally they scan it in the video while she is sitting on it.

Everyone is convinced that this guy rented the bike before the video starts but he very clearly rents the bike midway through the video after preventing her from scanning the bike herself by covering the scanner with his hand. It's right there in the video.

Why didn't this kid just rent another bike. Explain.

Clearly he was renting the bike as it was activated and had the app open. She got on it and claimed it was hers. She didn’t even have her phone out or make any attempt to book the bike. Wouldn’t surprise me if she doesn’t even have the app.

Why didn’t she just rent another bike if she even could. Explain.

The video doesn’t show when he scanned the QR code. He might have scanned it after she sat down. Or scanned it then turned his back. Unclear what the situation was when she sat down.

Except that if he’d paid before she sat down, it would have already been unlocked, instead of unlocking during the video.

This. People are confused. You can't reserve or unlock a bike unless you are right next to it. The bike is locked at the beginning of the video, it is unlocked during the video. We clearly see him covering the screen so she can't unlock it, even though she is straddling the bike and therefore has a better claim to the bike.

She does not steal a bike he paid for. He pays for a bike she is already on, and prevents her from paying for it herself.

I agree except I can see a scenario where I’m standing next to a bike getting ready to unlock it, and someone slides in an sits on it. But we have no evidence about whether that’s what happened because the video doesn’t show it. Even if she did slide in, he was in the wrong to physically try to continue to rent the bike (reaching over her, covering up the QR code.) She is the one who backs down and ends the confrontation.

Exactly. I said upthread that I don't understand how she came to be straddling the bike and holding he handlebars if he was in the process of renting it. If she actually came and slid into to sit on the bike, that would be REALLY egregious behavior on her part and I'd be fully on their side. But they don't say that's what she did. They just keep asserting it's "his" bike.

If it turns out she literally sat on the bike while he was trying to unlock it, I'll eat my words. But based on the video we see, all I see is him preventing her from scanning the bike out, then scanning it himself, then claiming it's his bike, and then her getting off it. You can criticize her demeanor if you want but I don't even think it's relevant -- she doesn't do anything wrong and it's pretty clear that he's using physical size and the presence of his friends to bully her out of the bike. Even if they both had equal claim to the bike (say they both arrived at exactly the same second), I find his behavior more troubling because of the physicality and the fact that his friends surround her. She is pissy but not aggressive. He's friendly/laughing but his physical choices ARE aggressive, especially holding his hand over the QR reader.

Well she grabs his phone. That was wrong. But he is also putting his arm on her body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is she fake crying, if she wants to be taken seriously?

Yes why is this victim not responding more gracefully to these bullies?

Why is that bully crying and screaming? While the victims try to calmly speak with her.

Why are they refusing to let her scan the bike she’s on? Explain.

Why is she refusing to get off the bike they scanned? Explain.

They scanned it after she was already on it. Literally they scan it in the video while she is sitting on it.

Everyone is convinced that this guy rented the bike before the video starts but he very clearly rents the bike midway through the video after preventing her from scanning the bike herself by covering the scanner with his hand. It's right there in the video.

Why didn't this kid just rent another bike. Explain.

Clearly he was renting the bike as it was activated and had the app open. She got on it and claimed it was hers. She didn’t even have her phone out or make any attempt to book the bike. Wouldn’t surprise me if she doesn’t even have the app.

Why didn’t she just rent another bike if she even could. Explain.

The video doesn’t show when he scanned the QR code. He might have scanned it after she sat down. Or scanned it then turned his back. Unclear what the situation was when she sat down.

Except that if he’d paid before she sat down, it would have already been unlocked, instead of unlocking during the video.

This. People are confused. You can't reserve or unlock a bike unless you are right next to it. The bike is locked at the beginning of the video, it is unlocked during the video. We clearly see him covering the screen so she can't unlock it, even though she is straddling the bike and therefore has a better claim to the bike.

She does not steal a bike he paid for. He pays for a bike she is already on, and prevents her from paying for it herself.

I agree except I can see a scenario where I’m standing next to a bike getting ready to unlock it, and someone slides in an sits on it. But we have no evidence about whether that’s what happened because the video doesn’t show it. Even if she did slide in, he was in the wrong to physically try to continue to rent the bike (reaching over her, covering up the QR code.) She is the one who backs down and ends the confrontation.

Exactly. I said upthread that I don't understand how she came to be straddling the bike and holding he handlebars if he was in the process of renting it. If she actually came and slid into to sit on the bike, that would be REALLY egregious behavior on her part and I'd be fully on their side. But they don't say that's what she did. They just keep asserting it's "his" bike.

If it turns out she literally sat on the bike while he was trying to unlock it, I'll eat my words. But based on the video we see, all I see is him preventing her from scanning the bike out, then scanning it himself, then claiming it's his bike, and then her getting off it. You can criticize her demeanor if you want but I don't even think it's relevant -- she doesn't do anything wrong and it's pretty clear that he's using physical size and the presence of his friends to bully her out of the bike. Even if they both had equal claim to the bike (say they both arrived at exactly the same second), I find his behavior more troubling because of the physicality and the fact that his friends surround her. She is pissy but not aggressive. He's friendly/laughing but his physical choices ARE aggressive, especially holding his hand over the QR reader.

All of this can be proven through the apps/time stamps/video. So we will know the truth.

I don’t care which thing is true. I’m just appalled so many people are calling her to be fired when it’s very plausible this is right and actually provably wrong she was trying to stick him with her bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt.

Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged.

White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt.

You think they would have learned something from Covington Catholic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

My god this! And to all the people saying she should have walked away from the start - eff that noise. You don’t give in to the bully. It just emboldens them. You call that sh¡t out EVERY SINGLE TIME.

And they are. They called her bullsh*t and since she’s spent a lifetime bullying others she’s shocked at being confronted. She’s having the day she deserves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt.

Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged.

White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt.

When they act like this, I sure hope so

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

My god this! And to all the people saying she should have walked away from the start - eff that noise. You don’t give in to the bully. It just emboldens them. You call that sh¡t out EVERY SINGLE TIME.

And they are. They called her bullsh*t and since she’s spent a lifetime bullying others she’s shocked at being confronted. She’s having the day she deserves.

On the one hand we have people trying to sort out a confusing video.

On the other hand we have people drawing conclusions based on her race, gender, and facial expression (whilst claiming to be anti-racist).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt.

Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged.

White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt.

When they act like this, I sure hope so

Then congrats. She will now prove to her employer that she’s not a thief. And I hope to God takes it to court next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt.

Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged.

White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt.

When they act like this, I sure hope so

Then congrats. She will now prove to her employer that she’s not a thief. And I hope to God takes it to court next.

Court over what??? You have lost your damn mind. This is why people don't believe white women. Because, like you, they will claim anything to get their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is she fake crying, if she wants to be taken seriously?

Yes why is this victim not responding more gracefully to these bullies?

Why is that bully crying and screaming? While the victims try to calmly speak with her.

Why are they refusing to let her scan the bike she’s on? Explain.

Why is she refusing to get off the bike they scanned? Explain.

They scanned it after she was already on it. Literally they scan it in the video while she is sitting on it.

Everyone is convinced that this guy rented the bike before the video starts but he very clearly rents the bike midway through the video after preventing her from scanning the bike herself by covering the scanner with his hand. It's right there in the video.

Why didn't this kid just rent another bike. Explain.

Clearly he was renting the bike as it was activated and had the app open. She got on it and claimed it was hers. She didn’t even have her phone out or make any attempt to book the bike. Wouldn’t surprise me if she doesn’t even have the app.

Why didn’t she just rent another bike if she even could. Explain.

The video doesn’t show when he scanned the QR code. He might have scanned it after she sat down. Or scanned it then turned his back. Unclear what the situation was when she sat down.

Except that if he’d paid before she sat down, it would have already been unlocked, instead of unlocking during the video.

This. People are confused. You can't reserve or unlock a bike unless you are right next to it. The bike is locked at the beginning of the video, it is unlocked during the video. We clearly see him covering the screen so she can't unlock it, even though she is straddling the bike and therefore has a better claim to the bike.

She does not steal a bike he paid for. He pays for a bike she is already on, and prevents her from paying for it herself.

I agree except I can see a scenario where I’m standing next to a bike getting ready to unlock it, and someone slides in an sits on it. But we have no evidence about whether that’s what happened because the video doesn’t show it. Even if she did slide in, he was in the wrong to physically try to continue to rent the bike (reaching over her, covering up the QR code.) She is the one who backs down and ends the confrontation.

Exactly. I said upthread that I don't understand how she came to be straddling the bike and holding he handlebars if he was in the process of renting it. If she actually came and slid into to sit on the bike, that would be REALLY egregious behavior on her part and I'd be fully on their side. But they don't say that's what she did. They just keep asserting it's "his" bike.

If it turns out she literally sat on the bike while he was trying to unlock it, I'll eat my words. But based on the video we see, all I see is him preventing her from scanning the bike out, then scanning it himself, then claiming it's his bike, and then her getting off it. You can criticize her demeanor if you want but I don't even think it's relevant -- she doesn't do anything wrong and it's pretty clear that he's using physical size and the presence of his friends to bully her out of the bike. Even if they both had equal claim to the bike (say they both arrived at exactly the same second), I find his behavior more troubling because of the physicality and the fact that his friends surround her. She is pissy but not aggressive. He's friendly/laughing but his physical choices ARE aggressive, especially holding his hand over the QR reader.

I find her behavior to be very aggressive. She is yelling, and pushing her body against his to get him to move. She snatched his phone. She tries to cry in order to get sympathy from others. She’s hoping someone will come and fight these boys.

The entire time he remains calm, as does his friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

My god this! And to all the people saying she should have walked away from the start - eff that noise. You don’t give in to the bully. It just emboldens them. You call that sh¡t out EVERY SINGLE TIME.

And they are. They called her bullsh*t and since she’s spent a lifetime bullying others she’s shocked at being confronted. She’s having the day she deserves.

On the one hand we have people trying to sort out a confusing video.

On the other hand we have people drawing conclusions based on on the guys race, gender, and facial expression (whilst claiming to be anti-racist).

FIFY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

My god this! And to all the people saying she should have walked away from the start - eff that noise. You don’t give in to the bully. It just emboldens them. You call that sh¡t out EVERY SINGLE TIME.

And they are. They called her bullsh*t and since she’s spent a lifetime bullying others she’s shocked at being confronted. She’s having the day she deserves.

On the one hand we have people trying to sort out a confusing video.

On the other hand we have people drawing conclusions based on on the guys race, gender, and facial expression (whilst claiming to be anti-racist).

FIFY

Literally nobody has said anything about the men’s race except the people hysterically claiming they are the next Emmett Tills.

[Anonymous]

This is the opening shot of the video. It shows her straddling the bike while he reaches in front of her, covering the reader with his hand. Her hand is on the handlebar and the cross bar is between her legs. He is beside the bike and the only hand on the bike is the one covering the reader:



At about the 15 second mark, the person with the camera moves in closer and is focused only on her, as she removes her ID card and calls help a couple times, but in the corner of the screen you can see the man who is covering the QR reader move his hand. At that point you hear the chunk and then the chime of the bike being unlocked. That's when he unlocks the bike.

It is not until the :54 second mark when the coworker approaches that the man says "this is my bike, it's on my account." That's because it was previously not on his account, and it's only when a new person arrives that he can claim it's on his account. He doesn't say this to the woman on the bike because she knows first that he has not yet scanned it, and later that he scanned it when she was on it.

Throughout the video, even the guys friends are not entirely on his side (except the guy videoing, he's always in the tank for the guy trying to take the bike). There's a guy in a pink sweatshirt who repeatedly suggests they should just let her have the bike. Not steal it, but have it.

He took the bike from her.

Regarding the crying. There is a split second where she puts her head in her right hand and kind of cries out in frustration. The guy with the phone immediately says "why are you fake crying." She isn't fake crying. She is frustrated. She is actually calm throughout the video, saying, relatively quietly "get off me." She does call out for help a few times but she never says anyone is hurting her and does not accuse these guys of anything, even though she could say "this guys I trying to take this bike from me" and it would be accurate because he is. She doesn't fake cry. It's just the guy narrating the video calls her facial expression "fake crying" and later claims she magically stopped crying (she never started crying, that's why there are no tears).

You are all falling victim to a very sketch reframing of events by this guy. She didn't steal the bike. She didn't fake cry. She didn't weaponize tears. She didn't weaponize her pregnancy. She tried to rent a bike and that guy prevented her from doing so, rented the bike she was sitting on, and made her move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain what you are supposed to do if someone walks up and tries to physically shove you off a bike you are renting while their friends surround you, laugh at you, and start filming you?

Like is your only option to just get off the bike, let them have it, and not complain or speak of it? Is that the only way to avoid being accused of weaponizing your tears, being called racist, or people claiming you are trying to get the people who bullied you off the bike shot or arrested?

I'm just trying to figure out if this woman had ANY options that would be deemed acceptable other than just letting these kids take the bike and walking away. I think the answer is no.

I have never been accused of weaponizing my tears because I don't act like this woman. Yes, walking away when you're dead wrong is the right thing to do. And yes, these kids should have filmed this encounter because black men know that that they are the last to be believed. Just look at how some of you are trying to defend her.

Laughing? Why, yes. She is acting like a toddler so the correct response is to laugh.

I actually completely believe that you wouldn’t stand up for yourself in this situation. You’d probably let them take the bike under your account.

Is that what you read. I believe I see what your problem is. You see things as you want them to be rather than as they are. She was in the wrong and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away because she knew she was wrong. That is quite different than standing up for yourself when you're being mistreated (which she wasn't)

She was in the RIGHT and threw a tantrum. She should have walked away and taken another bike. But she was pissed because he scanned the bike she was on, to take it from her.

She should never have done it. She should have walked away.

But he was the bully stealing her bike.

But he is the only one showing the code to prove that he had in fact scanned it. Why doesn't she do the same if she was in the right? because she was wrong.

She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it.

Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it.

Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike.

He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down.

Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.

Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive.

No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt.

Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged.

White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt.

When they act like this, I sure hope so

Then congrats. She will now prove to her employer that she’s not a thief. And I hope to God takes it to court next.

Court over what??? You have lost your damn mind. This is why people don't believe white women. Because, like you, they will claim anything to get their way.

The Root. For saying she was stealing.

[Anonymous]

Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.