Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
This. People are confused. You can't reserve or unlock a bike unless you are right next to it. The bike is locked at the beginning of the video, it is unlocked during the video. We clearly see him covering the screen so she can't unlock it, even though she is straddling the bike and therefore has a better claim to the bike. She does not steal a bike he paid for. He pays for a bike she is already on, and prevents her from paying for it herself. |
Exactly this. |
She thought she had possession of the bike because she was sitting on it. Somehow he scanned the QR code and unlocked the bike when she was sitting on it. Once she realized what he had done she got off the bike. He was in the wrong by snaking the bike, and she backed down. |
He did scan it. When she was on the bike. Then blocked her from scanning it. There’s no other reason for him to keep the code blocked. |
She could not scan the code because he is covering the scanner with his hand the whole time! Literally look at the opening shot of the video. She is on the bike, holding the handlebar with one hand (her other hand is in the air). He is standing in front of her, covering the scanner with his hand. This is how the video STARTS. He keeps his hand there the enter time even as she is reaching into her bag, putting away her ID and getting out her phone. He then reaches across her and scans the bike with his phone while blocking her with his other arm. The bike chimes and unlocks. And it is only at this point that he starts saying it's his bike or that he paid for the bike. It is only at this point that he shows anyone his phone screen to prove he paid for it. He did pay for it, but only because he prevented her from paying for it. She can't show anyone her phone proving she paid for it because he physically prevented her from doing so. |
Yeah, she acted totally rationally. And THAT is why we are all talking about it.
|
I agree except I can see a scenario where I’m standing next to a bike getting ready to unlock it, and someone slides in an sits on it. But we have no evidence about whether that’s what happened because the video doesn’t show it. Even if she did slide in, he was in the wrong to physically try to continue to rent the bike (reaching over her, covering up the QR code.) She is the one who backs down and ends the confrontation. |
Yes, that’s right. People are flipping out because she wasn’t a graceful victim. We do this all the time. You have to act JUST RIGHT as a victim or they will eat you alive. |
I don’t think I saw that part. I was thinking he might have scanned the QR code before the video starts, but completed the transaction during the confrontation. |
BS!!!! She wasn't a victim any more than he was. |
No you are thinking of black people. Which these victims did. They remained calm and you’re still blaming them instead of the woman yelling, snatching their phone and acting erratically. Only white people get the benefit of doubt. |
My god this! And to all the people saying she should have walked away from the start - eff that noise. You don’t give in to the bully. It just emboldens them. You call that sh¡t out EVERY SINGLE TIME. |
DP and I agree that it’s unclear. However it is clear he hadn’t paid, which is why it’s still locked, and why he’s blocking the code. He knows she could rent it if he doesn’t block it. If he scanned it before or after the video starts, either way, he wasn’t on the hook for the cost yet. So she wasn’t a thief. Which is probably why The Roots changed its defamatory headline. She could sue them. |
Exactly. I said upthread that I don't understand how she came to be straddling the bike and holding he handlebars if he was in the process of renting it. If she actually came and slid into to sit on the bike, that would be REALLY egregious behavior on her part and I'd be fully on their side. But they don't say that's what she did. They just keep asserting it's "his" bike. If it turns out she literally sat on the bike while he was trying to unlock it, I'll eat my words. But based on the video we see, all I see is him preventing her from scanning the bike out, then scanning it himself, then claiming it's his bike, and then her getting off it. You can criticize her demeanor if you want but I don't even think it's relevant -- she doesn't do anything wrong and it's pretty clear that he's using physical size and the presence of his friends to bully her out of the bike. Even if they both had equal claim to the bike (say they both arrived at exactly the same second), I find his behavior more troubling because of the physicality and the fact that his friends surround her. She is pissy but not aggressive. He's friendly/laughing but his physical choices ARE aggressive, especially holding his hand over the QR reader. |
Every major news outlet has sided with the men, who took the bike from her. No mainstream has acknowledged (yet) that she was wronged. White women may have lost the benefit of the doubt. |