The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

Seriously, she’s a great read. I haven’t read the Palace Papers yet, but I recommended the Diana Chronicles upthread. She’s even handed and sorts through the gossip that’s given to her, then gives her read on what it means based on who it is.

Tina Brown From Wikipedia:

“Having been editor-in-chief of Tatler magazine at the age of 25, she rose to prominence in the American media industry as the editor of Vanity Fair from 1984 to 1992 and of The New Yorker from 1992 to 1998. She was founding editor-in-chief of The Daily Beast, serving from 2008 to 2013.

As an editor, she has received four George Polk Awards, five Overseas Press Club awards, and ten National Magazine Awards.[5] In 2000, she was appointed a CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire) for her services to overseas journalism,[6] and in 2007 was inducted into the Magazine Editors' Hall of Fame.[7]

She edited Newsweek from 2011 to 2012. In 2010 she founded live journalism platfrom Women in the World, which she ran until 2020”

[Anonymous]

It will be a bestseller. Already on the top 12 new books recommended by the New York Times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

Seriously, she’s a great read. I haven’t read the Palace Papers yet, but I recommended the Diana Chronicles upthread. She’s even handed and sorts through the gossip that’s given to her, then gives her read on what it means based on who it is.

That said, she's an unreliable narrator and extremely biased against the Sussexes.

Where has she been biased against the Sussexes? The crazy celebrity site that shall not be named is convinced the book will be a hatchet job against the Sussexes, just based on the available blurbs but I’m not convinced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do think Tina Brown is not well-suited to assess issues of racism that MM might have encountered. She does not have a great track record on that front.

But she is a diligent journalist and a good writer.

NP: I agree with you on all of these points. I won’t be getting this particular book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

Seriously, she’s a great read. I haven’t read the Palace Papers yet, but I recommended the Diana Chronicles upthread. She’s even handed and sorts through the gossip that’s given to her, then gives her read on what it means based on who it is.

That said, she's an unreliable narrator and extremely biased against the Sussexes.

Where has she been biased against the Sussexes? The crazy celebrity site that shall not be named is convinced the book will be a hatchet job against the Sussexes, just based on the available blurbs but I’m not convinced.

What celebrity site? Are you talking about the Washington Post? Because that’s the conclusion they came to.

[Anonymous]

It’s already listed on the Amazon bestseller list!

[Anonymous]

Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

You’re a troll. Posting screenshots of some crack pot “abolish the monarchy” Twitter nobody on a thread just to bring it up to the first page? Go away troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It will be a bestseller. Already on the top 12 new books recommended by the New York Times.

link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

You’re a troll. Posting screenshots of some crack pot “abolish the monarchy” Twitter nobody on a thread just to bring it up to the first page? Go away troll.

Aww, go whine to William that his image is tarnished. I'm sure he'll pat you on the head for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

You’re a troll. Posting screenshots of some crack pot “abolish the monarchy” Twitter nobody on a thread just to bring it up to the first page? Go away troll.

Aww, go whine to William that his image is tarnished. I'm sure he'll pat you on the head for it.

Who’s going to tarnish his image? Some rando Twitter posts and you? Get a hobby woman, you’re pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

Literally no one with good sense is surprised by this. William is obviously a hot head in addition to a bigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

Literally no one with good sense is surprised by this. William is obviously a hot head in addition to a bigot.

Then he has the perfect credentials for becoming King. Still won't happen for at least a decade tho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

Literally no one with good sense is surprised by this. William is obviously a hot head in addition to a bigot.

Then he has the perfect credentials for becoming King. Still won't happen for at least a decade tho.

You’re not wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe that bullying investigation needs to be updated...

I mean I think William is a bigot and a horrible person. However, the staff truly did a terrible job. Notice how the Wessex staff cancelled their tours before they had to publicly sit there and be essentially fired by a commonwealth country. And their staff didn’t seem to think it was a bad idea to do a photo op of them grazing the hands of brown people behind a fence? Amateur hour.