The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw an article today on Medium about how the Cambridges are white supremacists and want you to know it. I can’t seem to get the link to work though. Maybe someone else can link it.

Here you go:
https://medium.com/@MyLovelySuqu/prince-william-and-kate-middleton-are-white-supremacists-and-they-want-you-to-know-it-f40b11384c2b

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does William have a project he organized like Invictus for Harry? I know they had that Heads Together thing but that was William, Kate and Harry together so that doesn’t count. I mean something that’s just his that he obviously cares about. Anything?

William doesn’t have to do shi$… he will be King. Harry will just be… Harry. Indict us helps for sure to keep them in lights but nothing else much.

William doesn’t have to do shit but the Queen and Charles do? How does that work lol?

He makes plenty of appearances and is regularly at events, championing causes, etc. He’s also a father of three little kids and maybe he wants to be a more present father and husband than his father and grandfather. Or maybe he’s depressed. Or facing other issues. We have no idea. But William seems as engaged and devoted to his role as one could expect and these criticisms seem mean spirited.

I gave you the court circular link. No, he doesn’t show up regularly. Look at what his grandma was doing. Look at what his father, his step mom, Sophie, Edward, Meghan and Harry were doing. He’s by all accounts not a present father and that’s not the arrangement. He is a lazy man.

But hey, he’s going to finish off the monarchy when the people revolt at him being unable to keep up his end of the bargain.

Kate is more important to the continuation of the monarchy than he is. And she's doing fine.

I think you could make that argument if the monarchy status quo was generally positive-- scandal free and stable-- but, it's not. You described Kate as fine. She is, but only fine. She doesn't have the endearing or sparkly qualities that garner significant affection or loyalty. That's what you need to counter the damage that's been done in recent years.

She does. She is a good mother and she is unflappable. The queen is loved now because she has endured. Not out of a sense of godliness but because she's been there forever. People have gotten used to Camilla, but Kate is not an interloper, she is steady. And she'll remain steady, there's no question of it.

The Queen is popular not just for her steadiness but because she has worked tirelessly for 75 years in service to the people. You can't say the same for Kate. (And you can't use the excuse of small children. She didn't work before they were born, either.)

What a bunch of crock. Work tirelessly?? Doing what? What exactly did she do for all the Caribbean nations that are now rejecting her? Please describe all the work she has tirelessly done for them.

She showed up and didn't wait until she was forced at 40 to visit her realms. Same with Charles. Same with Anne. Point blank. Sad to say the bar is that low and the Cambridges can't even do that.

Are you DENSE? She became Queen when she was 25, it was her freaking job. William and Kate are the grandchildren of the monarch, I mean, he's not even first in line. What do you expect him to do? You're so dumb.

Someone is.

William is supposed to be doing royal work. He’s supposed to be opening centres and new wings of buildings. He’s supposed to be cutting ribbons and pulling tiny curtains open. He’s supposed to be doing charity work. That’s the whole deal, yes, even as the heir to the heir. And he doesn’t do it.

Yeah he does. Despite you saying the same thing over and over again.

Yet I would bet that you haven’t looked at the court circular and compared his numbers with that of his grandmother and his father. He’s supposed to be out there doing royal “work;” he isn’t.

Both of whom were absentee parents. Its okay for things to change for the better.

Psh. Princess Anne has always had higher numbers as well and does not appear to be an absentee parent. Same for the Wessexes. Besides that the absence of royal work is not the presence of time with their children. All three of their kids are in school for the majority of the day and they Cambridges don’t even do the school run every day. It’s not like they’re at home putting in a load of laundry either. It’s very mysterious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Pass. Doesn’t sound like there’s really anything new in it. Just the same old rehash about how Meghan didn’t fit in because she was too American or a striver or whatever. I’m not even convinced she has real sources considering she didn’t know they were coming to visit just like everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Pass. Doesn’t sound like there’s really anything new in it. Just the same old rehash about how Meghan didn’t fit in because she was too American or a striver or whatever. I’m not even convinced she has real sources considering she didn’t know they were coming to visit just like everyone else.

+1. It just sounds like nonsense and I wouldn't dream of wasting my money on this or giving it a second thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw an article today on Medium about how the Cambridges are white supremacists and want you to know it. I can’t seem to get the link to work though. Maybe someone else can link it.

Here you go:
https://medium.com/@MyLovelySuqu/prince-william-and-kate-middleton-are-white-supremacists-and-they-want-you-to-know-it-f40b11384c2b

Whether or not they want or don't want to be seen as upholders of white supremacy, they are, point blank. Their role at the head of the monarchical institution responsible for upholding classism confirms that. They are, by a near perfect definition of the term, white supremacists.

I mean the antebellum Scarlett O'Hara portrait Kate chose for her 40th birthday, not to mention the colonial tour jeep ride should have been nails on the head for this. Their 'mistakes' in regards to race have gone on as long as they've been married and prior to that too. *cough* Slave portrait for welcoming Obama as a guest *end cough*

[Anonymous]

This is just too funny not to share.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does William have a project he organized like Invictus for Harry? I know they had that Heads Together thing but that was William, Kate and Harry together so that doesn’t count. I mean something that’s just his that he obviously cares about. Anything?

William doesn’t have to do shi$… he will be King. Harry will just be… Harry. Indict us helps for sure to keep them in lights but nothing else much.

William doesn’t have to do shit but the Queen and Charles do? How does that work lol?

He makes plenty of appearances and is regularly at events, championing causes, etc. He’s also a father of three little kids and maybe he wants to be a more present father and husband than his father and grandfather. Or maybe he’s depressed. Or facing other issues. We have no idea. But William seems as engaged and devoted to his role as one could expect and these criticisms seem mean spirited.

I gave you the court circular link. No, he doesn’t show up regularly. Look at what his grandma was doing. Look at what his father, his step mom, Sophie, Edward, Meghan and Harry were doing. He’s by all accounts not a present father and that’s not the arrangement. He is a lazy man.

But hey, he’s going to finish off the monarchy when the people revolt at him being unable to keep up his end of the bargain.

Kate is more important to the continuation of the monarchy than he is. And she's doing fine.

I think you could make that argument if the monarchy status quo was generally positive-- scandal free and stable-- but, it's not. You described Kate as fine. She is, but only fine. She doesn't have the endearing or sparkly qualities that garner significant affection or loyalty. That's what you need to counter the damage that's been done in recent years.

She does. She is a good mother and she is unflappable. The queen is loved now because she has endured. Not out of a sense of godliness but because she's been there forever. People have gotten used to Camilla, but Kate is not an interloper, she is steady. And she'll remain steady, there's no question of it.

The Queen is popular not just for her steadiness but because she has worked tirelessly for 75 years in service to the people. You can't say the same for Kate. (And you can't use the excuse of small children. She didn't work before they were born, either.)

What a bunch of crock. Work tirelessly?? Doing what? What exactly did she do for all the Caribbean nations that are now rejecting her? Please describe all the work she has tirelessly done for them.

She showed up and didn't wait until she was forced at 40 to visit her realms. Same with Charles. Same with Anne. Point blank. Sad to say the bar is that low and the Cambridges can't even do that.

Are you DENSE? She became Queen when she was 25, it was her freaking job. William and Kate are the grandchildren of the monarch, I mean, he's not even first in line. What do you expect him to do? You're so dumb.

Someone is.

William is supposed to be doing royal work. He’s supposed to be opening centres and new wings of buildings. He’s supposed to be cutting ribbons and pulling tiny curtains open. He’s supposed to be doing charity work. That’s the whole deal, yes, even as the heir to the heir. And he doesn’t do it.

Yeah he does. Despite you saying the same thing over and over again.

Yet I would bet that you haven’t looked at the court circular and compared his numbers with that of his grandmother and his father. He’s supposed to be out there doing royal “work;” he isn’t.

Both of whom were absentee parents. Its okay for things to change for the better.

Psh. Princess Anne has always had higher numbers as well and does not appear to be an absentee parent. Same for the Wessexes. Besides that the absence of royal work is not the presence of time with their children. All three of their kids are in school for the majority of the day and they Cambridges don’t even do the school run every day. It’s not like they’re at home putting in a load of laundry either. It’s very mysterious.

Not at all. They’re both incredibly lazy. No mystery at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does William have a project he organized like Invictus for Harry? I know they had that Heads Together thing but that was William, Kate and Harry together so that doesn’t count. I mean something that’s just his that he obviously cares about. Anything?

William doesn’t have to do shi$… he will be King. Harry will just be… Harry. Indict us helps for sure to keep them in lights but nothing else much.

William doesn’t have to do shit but the Queen and Charles do? How does that work lol?

He makes plenty of appearances and is regularly at events, championing causes, etc. He’s also a father of three little kids and maybe he wants to be a more present father and husband than his father and grandfather. Or maybe he’s depressed. Or facing other issues. We have no idea. But William seems as engaged and devoted to his role as one could expect and these criticisms seem mean spirited.

I gave you the court circular link. No, he doesn’t show up regularly. Look at what his grandma was doing. Look at what his father, his step mom, Sophie, Edward, Meghan and Harry were doing. He’s by all accounts not a present father and that’s not the arrangement. He is a lazy man.

But hey, he’s going to finish off the monarchy when the people revolt at him being unable to keep up his end of the bargain.

Kate is more important to the continuation of the monarchy than he is. And she's doing fine.

I think you could make that argument if the monarchy status quo was generally positive-- scandal free and stable-- but, it's not. You described Kate as fine. She is, but only fine. She doesn't have the endearing or sparkly qualities that garner significant affection or loyalty. That's what you need to counter the damage that's been done in recent years.

She does. She is a good mother and she is unflappable. The queen is loved now because she has endured. Not out of a sense of godliness but because she's been there forever. People have gotten used to Camilla, but Kate is not an interloper, she is steady. And she'll remain steady, there's no question of it.

The Queen is popular not just for her steadiness but because she has worked tirelessly for 75 years in service to the people. You can't say the same for Kate. (And you can't use the excuse of small children. She didn't work before they were born, either.)

What a bunch of crock. Work tirelessly?? Doing what? What exactly did she do for all the Caribbean nations that are now rejecting her? Please describe all the work she has tirelessly done for them.

She showed up and didn't wait until she was forced at 40 to visit her realms. Same with Charles. Same with Anne. Point blank. Sad to say the bar is that low and the Cambridges can't even do that.

Are you DENSE? She became Queen when she was 25, it was her freaking job. William and Kate are the grandchildren of the monarch, I mean, he's not even first in line. What do you expect him to do? You're so dumb.

Someone is.

William is supposed to be doing royal work. He’s supposed to be opening centres and new wings of buildings. He’s supposed to be cutting ribbons and pulling tiny curtains open. He’s supposed to be doing charity work. That’s the whole deal, yes, even as the heir to the heir. And he doesn’t do it.

Yeah he does. Despite you saying the same thing over and over again.

Yet I would bet that you haven’t looked at the court circular and compared his numbers with that of his grandmother and his father. He’s supposed to be out there doing royal “work;” he isn’t.

Both of whom were absentee parents. Its okay for things to change for the better.

Psh. Princess Anne has always had higher numbers as well and does not appear to be an absentee parent. Same for the Wessexes. Besides that the absence of royal work is not the presence of time with their children. All three of their kids are in school for the majority of the day and they Cambridges don’t even do the school run every day. It’s not like they’re at home putting in a load of laundry either. It’s very mysterious.

Not at all. They’re both incredibly lazy. No mystery at all.

So lazy the audacity is just incredible.

Today was the annual National Parade of Queen's Scouts at Windsor Castle. A royal has been present to take the salute for ten years straight.

No one shows up. Guess who the President of the Scouts is? Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does William have a project he organized like Invictus for Harry? I know they had that Heads Together thing but that was William, Kate and Harry together so that doesn’t count. I mean something that’s just his that he obviously cares about. Anything?

William doesn’t have to do shi$… he will be King. Harry will just be… Harry. Indict us helps for sure to keep them in lights but nothing else much.

William doesn’t have to do shit but the Queen and Charles do? How does that work lol?

He makes plenty of appearances and is regularly at events, championing causes, etc. He’s also a father of three little kids and maybe he wants to be a more present father and husband than his father and grandfather. Or maybe he’s depressed. Or facing other issues. We have no idea. But William seems as engaged and devoted to his role as one could expect and these criticisms seem mean spirited.

I gave you the court circular link. No, he doesn’t show up regularly. Look at what his grandma was doing. Look at what his father, his step mom, Sophie, Edward, Meghan and Harry were doing. He’s by all accounts not a present father and that’s not the arrangement. He is a lazy man.

But hey, he’s going to finish off the monarchy when the people revolt at him being unable to keep up his end of the bargain.

Kate is more important to the continuation of the monarchy than he is. And she's doing fine.

I think you could make that argument if the monarchy status quo was generally positive-- scandal free and stable-- but, it's not. You described Kate as fine. She is, but only fine. She doesn't have the endearing or sparkly qualities that garner significant affection or loyalty. That's what you need to counter the damage that's been done in recent years.

She does. She is a good mother and she is unflappable. The queen is loved now because she has endured. Not out of a sense of godliness but because she's been there forever. People have gotten used to Camilla, but Kate is not an interloper, she is steady. And she'll remain steady, there's no question of it.

The Queen is popular not just for her steadiness but because she has worked tirelessly for 75 years in service to the people. You can't say the same for Kate. (And you can't use the excuse of small children. She didn't work before they were born, either.)

What a bunch of crock. Work tirelessly?? Doing what? What exactly did she do for all the Caribbean nations that are now rejecting her? Please describe all the work she has tirelessly done for them.

She showed up and didn't wait until she was forced at 40 to visit her realms. Same with Charles. Same with Anne. Point blank. Sad to say the bar is that low and the Cambridges can't even do that.

Are you DENSE? She became Queen when she was 25, it was her freaking job. William and Kate are the grandchildren of the monarch, I mean, he's not even first in line. What do you expect him to do? You're so dumb.

Someone is.

William is supposed to be doing royal work. He’s supposed to be opening centres and new wings of buildings. He’s supposed to be cutting ribbons and pulling tiny curtains open. He’s supposed to be doing charity work. That’s the whole deal, yes, even as the heir to the heir. And he doesn’t do it.

Yeah he does. Despite you saying the same thing over and over again.

Yet I would bet that you haven’t looked at the court circular and compared his numbers with that of his grandmother and his father. He’s supposed to be out there doing royal “work;” he isn’t.

Both of whom were absentee parents. Its okay for things to change for the better.

Psh. Princess Anne has always had higher numbers as well and does not appear to be an absentee parent. Same for the Wessexes. Besides that the absence of royal work is not the presence of time with their children. All three of their kids are in school for the majority of the day and they Cambridges don’t even do the school run every day. It’s not like they’re at home putting in a load of laundry either. It’s very mysterious.

Not at all. They’re both incredibly lazy. No mystery at all.

So lazy the audacity is just incredible.

Today was the annual National Parade of Queen's Scouts at Windsor Castle. A royal has been present to take the salute for ten years straight.

No one shows up. Guess who the President of the Scouts is? Kate.

It probably used to be the Queen who showed up? Yes, Kate is astonishingly lazy. She did the same thing with the Irish Guards - it was one of the first jobs she was given and she showed up once and then said not to expect that again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

Seriously, she’s a great read. I haven’t read the Palace Papers yet, but I recommended the Diana Chronicles upthread. She’s even handed and sorts through the gossip that’s given to her, then gives her read on what it means based on who it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning to read Tina Brown’s new book?

Definitely! Sounds like a juicy read: https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2022/04/23/meghan-markle-royal-family-book-tina-brown/

Omg I’m dying!

The life of a Windsor is one of such drab constraint — endlessly tedious public appearances, gloomy holidays spent in drafty castles — even Brown can’t figure out why Kate would want it. After years together, William, humiliatingly, once broke up with her on the phone before eventually realizing her quiet forbearance and devotion to duty made her a natural for a life spent opening Tescos in Wales. They married in 2011.

Hahahaha that can't be a real quote.

DP. It's a real quote from the WaPo article. It's their characterization of what Brown wrote, and it's probably pretty spot on. It sounds like Brown.

Ha!

I don’t know anything about this Tina Brown person, but if that characterization is accurate, I might check out the book.

Seriously, she’s a great read. I haven’t read the Palace Papers yet, but I recommended the Diana Chronicles upthread. She’s even handed and sorts through the gossip that’s given to her, then gives her read on what it means based on who it is.

That said, she's an unreliable narrator and extremely biased against the Sussexes.