Gaza war and College Campus Protests

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like a lot of individuals who have strong feelings of condemnation toward Israel’s actions and policies and toward anyone who unconditionally supports those actions and policies, I’m ready to recognize Israel as a full-fledged member of the global community when it meets certain conditions. First, removal of the Netanyahu administration from power and delivery of Netanyahu to the ICC/ICJ for prosecution. Second, banning the Likud party and any political party that supports the settler movement as state-sponsors of terrorism. Third, commitment to a two-state solution within five years with security guarantees for all states in the region, not just for Israel. Fourth, scaled-reduction of any aid to the region used for military assistance, replaced at some level by aid to be used for rebuilding and civil development projects. And fifth, commitment by Israel and all states in the region to adhere to international law, to officially recognize the right of all regional states to exist, and to observe and respect borders, airspace, and national sovereignty.

Luckily for all others, nobody gives a crap about what you are ready to recognize. Your whole rant reeks of narcissism.

Sounds like someone is pleased as punch with the status quo. Good. Those like you who don’t find torment in the status quo of Israel’s atrocities deserve every ounce of misfortune that can possibly find its way to your doorstep.

[Anonymous]

We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

No. I want nobody in that region to have nukes. But if our policy is that Israel may possess them, which has clearly been the policy for decades, I want to stop being told that others shouldn’t possess them for any reason other than the fact that we are hypocrites and corruption dictates our actions. In other words, I’m just looking for a bare minimum of honesty from people running around pretending that they have the putt read regarding who’s good and who’s evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like a lot of individuals who have strong feelings of condemnation toward Israel’s actions and policies and toward anyone who unconditionally supports those actions and policies, I’m ready to recognize Israel as a full-fledged member of the global community when it meets certain conditions. First, removal of the Netanyahu administration from power and delivery of Netanyahu to the ICC/ICJ for prosecution. Second, banning the Likud party and any political party that supports the settler movement as state-sponsors of terrorism. Third, commitment to a two-state solution within five years with security guarantees for all states in the region, not just for Israel. Fourth, scaled-reduction of any aid to the region used for military assistance, replaced at some level by aid to be used for rebuilding and civil development projects. And fifth, commitment by Israel and all states in the region to adhere to international law, to officially recognize the right of all regional states to exist, and to observe and respect borders, airspace, and national sovereignty.

Luckily for all others, nobody gives a crap about what you are ready to recognize. Your whole rant reeks of narcissism.

Sounds like someone is pleased as punch with the status quo. Good. Those like you who don’t find torment in the status quo of Israel’s atrocities deserve every ounce of misfortune that can possibly find its way to your doorstep.

Typical fanatic rant from you, yet here you are and not joining Palestinians in their fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

U. S. Bombed counties to split them. You are a delusional terrorist. What a Nazi you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

The state department doesn't approve what Israel can do. Israel approves what the State Department says Israel can do...

Isn't that obvious to you by now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

U. S. Bombed counties to split them. You are a delusional terrorist. What a Nazi you are.

That post makes someone a delusional terrorist and a Nazi? For questioning why Israel is allowed by the U.S. to do destructive things that other countries are blocked by the U.S. from defending themselves against?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

The state department doesn't approve what Israel can do. Israel approves what the State Department says Israel can do...

Isn't that obvious to you by now?

Who consented to that arrangement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

Pakistan has nukes. They aren’t friends with Palestinians so Israel doesn’t care. Why shouldn’t Iran? They’re a far wealthier country.

Palestine maybe needs a nuked up friend as deterrence.

Russia is super anti semitic and has nukes. Russia had more to do with 10/7 than Iran. Wagner group trained Hamas.

Why is Iran the fly in the ointment for Israel? They should have more anger toward Russia about 10/7. Iranian proxies like Hezbollah and Houthis werent involved in 10/7. The Russian mercenary Wagner Group based in Sudan were involved in 10/7 and all the weapons Hamas used were Russian RPG’s and Russian weapons not Iranian.

Why get your panties in a bunch over Iran when if anything, Russia is the far bigger culprit and threat to Israel? Israel ignores actual evidence of Russias footprint that day to go by their biases and 10 year hard on about US invading Iran

[Anonymous]

Putins birthday is October 7

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

Israel doesn’t want some peaceful liberal to run Palestinian government. They want Palestine to defend itself as it certainly helps the political right in Israel to hold on to power. Hamas also needs Israel in order to exist as a political ideology.

It’s a strange symbiotic relationship between the Israeli right and Palestinian right wing and the relationship was fostered by Benjamin Netanyahu, the head of the Likud Party since 1980s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

Lots of countries have nukes. Why does Israel lie about not having nukes? Everyone knows they do.

The only country in human history to use nukes is the US. That happened in 1945 around the same time as the Holocaust and if anything Japan deserves the special relationship and we have a bigger moral obligation to them not Israel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

Pakistan has nukes. They aren’t friends with Palestinians so Israel doesn’t care. Why shouldn’t Iran? They’re a far wealthier country.

Palestine maybe needs a nuked up friend as deterrence.

Russia is super anti semitic and has nukes. Russia had more to do with 10/7 than Iran. Wagner group trained Hamas.

Why is Iran the fly in the ointment for Israel? They should have more anger toward Russia about 10/7. Iranian proxies like Hezbollah and Houthis werent involved in 10/7. The Russian mercenary Wagner Group based in Sudan were involved in 10/7 and all the weapons Hamas used were Russian RPG’s and Russian weapons not Iranian.

Why get your panties in a bunch over Iran when if anything, Russia is the far bigger culprit and threat to Israel? Israel ignores actual evidence of Russias footprint that day to go by their biases and 10 year hard on about US invading Iran

Why shouldn't Iran have nukes? C'mon.

The whole group of posts supporting Iran having nuclear capability demonstrates (again) that we have multiple non-US posters who are directly antagonistic to US interests.

Ugly stuff, but glad that it's been illustrated so clearly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We keep hearing from State about Israel’s right to defend itself, but nothing of the rights of other countries to defend themselves in the face of Israeli attacks.

Does anybody at State ever think of the optics of that hypocrisy, or the hypocrisy of tacitly approving nuclear weapons and WMDs in Israel while clutching pearls over other countries pursuing the same to protect themselves from Israel’s aggressions?

Seriously - does anyone working at State have the slightest bit of awareness to understand how all of this appears to those who aren’t corrupted by Zionism?

So you want Iran to have nukes. Brilliant

Pakistan has nukes. They aren’t friends with Palestinians so Israel doesn’t care. Why shouldn’t Iran? They’re a far wealthier country.

Palestine maybe needs a nuked up friend as deterrence.

Russia is super anti semitic and has nukes. Russia had more to do with 10/7 than Iran. Wagner group trained Hamas.

Why is Iran the fly in the ointment for Israel? They should have more anger toward Russia about 10/7. Iranian proxies like Hezbollah and Houthis werent involved in 10/7. The Russian mercenary Wagner Group based in Sudan were involved in 10/7 and all the weapons Hamas used were Russian RPG’s and Russian weapons not Iranian.

Why get your panties in a bunch over Iran when if anything, Russia is the far bigger culprit and threat to Israel? Israel ignores actual evidence of Russias footprint that day to go by their biases and 10 year hard on about US invading Iran

Why shouldn't Iran have nukes? C'mon.

The whole group of posts supporting Iran having nuclear capability demonstrates (again) that we have multiple non-US posters who are directly antagonistic to US interests.

Ugly stuff, but glad that it's been illustrated so clearly.

Can’t speak for others, but I’ve become completely opposed to just about everything related to Israel, which is a mindset reinforced by the deadbeats in here defending Israel and taunting those who dare to criticize Israel. I also want answers to the question of why Israel is enabled to influence U.S. foreign policy to the absurd extent that it does, and your dismissal of those demands won’t change that demand. And finally, my demographical makeup has no bearing, but it is as close to the opposite of what you suggest as possible.