War with Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ru roh... Are they going to kill him too?

There is only room on this earth for one supreme leader. Trump will be demanding the title soon. Who's going to give him a special award that has "Supreme Leader" inscribed on it, to hang on the wall next to his peace prize? I don't think there's enough room on the Kennedy Center tho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ru roh... Are they going to kill him too?

There is only room on this earth for one supreme leader. Trump will be demanding the title soon. Who's going to give him a special award that has "Supreme Leader" inscribed on it, to hang on the wall next to his peace prize? I don't think there's enough room on the Kennedy Center tho.

Dude you really can’t call Trump a leader. Bibi is the leader and Trump is a follower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Top Iraq War Major Gen. Paul Eaton (ret.). "The shocking lack of planning and obvious by-the-seat-of-their-pants strategic decisionmaking by the Trump administration shows that whoever is in charge of this is not mentally responsible enough to have the fate of hundreds of millions of lives in his hands. Invading Iran would be beyond idiotic and the fact that he’s even considering it should be grounds for removal by the 25th Amendment."

Oh they are planning on taking the Iranian oilfields and invading the Iranian side of the straights. There will be boots on the ground within a week. The mission will not be liberation but taking the oilfields.

With what troops? The US doesn't have the hundred thousand or more troops it would take to do this in the ME right now. The best it could do is a few thousand from some rapid response units. They could probably take an airport. They cannot take entire oilfields or a coastline. And even if they did take the coastline, drones can easily be fired from further away. You don't need to be sitting on the beach to hit a ship.

They are proposing using the 82nd airborne corp and the 75 Ranger Regiment to secure the Iranians side of the Strait of Hormuz. The marines for the oilfields. The president wants action after the Iranians blew up that school!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not surprised that this administration bombed a school because they were using outdated maps. I’m not surprised that Trump could not care less. But it saddens me to see all these republican congressmen make excuses and deflect. This, just like dozens of other things, should have been their breaking point. Republicans used to at least pretend to care about post-womb humans. Watching them go back and forth between, “Whoops! Well, people die!” and “Wasn’t us!” is just absolutely nauseating. I don’t know how 40% of this country is so cruel and heartless. Their hate is fueled by racism, misogyny, and greed.

You believe the outdated maps? Israel and America don’t bomb anything without their camera drones surveying a place first. They knew that was a school. They didn’t care

It would be nice if Iran valued their girls as much alive as they seem to do when they are dead.

Exactly. They treat women and girls like dogs (or worse) but use tragedies like this to pretend they’re horribly outraged and grieving. And the usual suspects always fall for it. There was an AI photo circulating that purported to show Iranians grieving over the girls’ coffins. Spare me.

So in your mind this justifies the deaths of 127 girls?

No where was that stated. What I’m saying is that it is disingenuous to treat your girls and women like breeding stock and then use their deaths as symbols of your oppression.

You’re so programmed it’s sad. They were elementary school girls. What breeding stock are you talking about? Don’t forget people like you make the argument they don’t go to school at all remember? Get out of your racist programming and grow some empathy.

np -- You are being obtuse about what PP is saying. She didn't say she had no empathy for the girls; she is accusing Iran of having no empathy except when it's good PR. She is saying those girls were doomed before they were bombed (editorial aside: at least they were in school).

PP's comments are not sides in the war (maybe PP has a side, but these comments don't reveal that). They are parenthetical to the war. She's simply saying that Iran's treatment of women sucks (editorial aside: as do, obviously, Trump's, Kegsbreath's, and Netanyahu's).

At least they were in school invalidated everything you were saying. Again, you are propagandized. Iran’s fertility rate is 1.44 kids per woman, less than the United States and less than Israel’s. 70% of college STEM graduates are women in Iran. 40% of the nuclear scientists in Iran are women. More than Israel, more than the Us

Not true. Keep getting your stats from Twitter.

Not from Twitter. During a visit to Tehran, Rafael Grossi, the IAEA Director General said he was very surprised by the large number of women Iran employs as nuclear scientists.

The other information comes from
The UN

https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g25/103/72/pdf/g2510372.pdf


When will Israel allow the director general of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to inspect their actual nuclear facilities? Iran agreed to inspections despite not even having a nuclear bomb due to religious reasons from the ayatollah.

We all know this is the reason Israel is after Iran

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_in_Iran

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

DP. Clearly you haven’t been looking at polls not featured on Fox News. A majority of Americans do not support this war, even while many are pleased it has resulted in damaging the ruling regime. Both things can be true at the same time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump may actually be panicking. He’s definitely flailing. Angry that Iran picked a leader who is even worse than the one he assassinated. Furious that tankers won’t sail through the straits. Disgruntled that he had to miss golf for the dignified transfer.

This has been a disaster.

I don’t think he is panicking. I think he is being buttered up by Graham, Netanyahu, Loomer, and others

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

Israel is taking a lot of damage but the Iranian are not going to defeat them with a bombing campaign. This should set Israel back for a few years though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

What was defeated? The ayatollahs are still there and the regime change failed three times in less than 12 months. The ayatollah is not the shah of Iran and he’s not Saddam Hussein. They were too decadent so it was easy for the people to rise up and tear them down. The ayatollah helped the poor in Iran to rise up with free education, healthcare, and most controversially, wealth redistribution which is why Iranian Americans and in London (the wealthy class pre Islamic Revolution) hate him. It’s like Cubans in Cuba liking Castro but rich Cubans in Miami hating him.

The only way to ply a regime change out of Iran would be US boots on the ground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

Last a few weeks? Trump is going to announce boots on the ground by the end of this week

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

Because it’s unclear who the terrorists are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does maga support this? How does a war with Iran make their lives better?

It's a cult and their leader told them to support it. I just wish MAGA was a suicide cult.

What makes you think they aren’t? Suicide cults don’t care about collateral damage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Top Iraq War Major Gen. Paul Eaton (ret.). "The shocking lack of planning and obvious by-the-seat-of-their-pants strategic decisionmaking by the Trump administration shows that whoever is in charge of this is not mentally responsible enough to have the fate of hundreds of millions of lives in his hands. Invading Iran would be beyond idiotic and the fact that he’s even considering it should be grounds for removal by the 25th Amendment."

Oh they are planning on taking the Iranian oilfields and invading the Iranian side of the straights. There will be boots on the ground within a week. The mission will not be liberation but taking the oilfields.

With what troops? The US doesn't have the hundred thousand or more troops it would take to do this in the ME right now. The best it could do is a few thousand from some rapid response units. They could probably take an airport. They cannot take entire oilfields or a coastline. And even if they did take the coastline, drones can easily be fired from further away. You don't need to be sitting on the beach to hit a ship.

They are proposing using the 82nd airborne corp and the 75 Ranger Regiment to secure the Iranians side of the Strait of Hormuz. The marines for the oilfields. The president wants action after the Iranians blew up that school!

The 82nd IRF is about 4,000 soldiers. The 75th Rangers is about 3,500. There are no substantial marine units that can deploy to Iran in a week. Sending 7,500 soldiers to secure a coastline that is 100 miles long and in enemy territory would be insane. Also, it's now well-documented the US blew up the school. There's even video of the Tomahawk that did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGAs love it. They get to feel like Rambo inside their heads and kill Muslims.

Replace MAGA with Israel and you’re right. MAGA is not happy about another forever war

A lot of them think that this is going to last a few weeks, and it's a small price to pay for "peace and prosperity forever". I wish I were kidding.

No one thinks this, but nice try. If anything, many people are happy to see a terrorist regime defeated, or at least greatly diminished. Why aren’t you?

Have you enlisted yet?