Kamala Harris for President

[Anonymous]

I don't think Pennsylvania voters like her response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

NEW: Kamala Harris vows to close detention centers that hold illegal immigrants "on day one" if she becomes president.

The statement completely contradicts Harris' recent push to appear as a candidate who wants a secure border.

Question: "When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"

Answer: "Absolutely, on day one."

Detention centers are currently used to hold "noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention or those that ICE determines are a public safety or flight risk during the custody determination process." (ICE)

Harris wants to release them into the public.

Yes, the privately run ones that were holding children. Like private prisons, they were being run for profit and not for justice.

What is wrong with you? Can you not find anything of substance to bring to the table, without either directly lying or editing to obscure truth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

NEW: Kamala Harris vows to close detention centers that hold illegal immigrants "on day one" if she becomes president.

The statement completely contradicts Harris' recent push to appear as a candidate who wants a secure border.

Question: "When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"

Answer: "Absolutely, on day one."

Detention centers are currently used to hold "noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention or those that ICE determines are a public safety or flight risk during the custody determination process." (ICE)

Harris wants to release them into the public.

Yes, the privately run ones that were holding children. Like private prisons, they were being run for profit and not for justice.

What is wrong with you? Can you not find anything of substance to bring to the table, without either directly lying or editing to obscure truth?

It’s going to be a rough 8 years for these people if this is the best they can do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

NEW: Kamala Harris vows to close detention centers that hold illegal immigrants "on day one" if she becomes president.

The statement completely contradicts Harris' recent push to appear as a candidate who wants a secure border.

Question: "When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"

Answer: "Absolutely, on day one."

Detention centers are currently used to hold "noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention or those that ICE determines are a public safety or flight risk during the custody determination process." (ICE)

Harris wants to release them into the public.

Yes, the privately run ones that were holding children. Like private prisons, they were being run for profit and not for justice.

What is wrong with you? Can you not find anything of substance to bring to the table, without either directly lying or editing to obscure truth?

That is NOT what she said. The question that was asked was ""When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"
Her response was "Absolutely!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess the barrage of Daily Mail links telling us half-truths about Harris and hoping something sticks is now coming our way.

Half truths, right. But full-on admitted baloney like the couch stuff is fine because "vibes".
Don't they know she is the candidate of JOY? Don't ask for pesky details.
Also not 6 weeks ago people on this very forum were suggesting how to dump Harris because she was considered an election liability for her poor performance. Your ability to hairpin turn is astounding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess the barrage of Daily Mail links telling us half-truths about Harris and hoping something sticks is now coming our way.

Half truths, right. But full-on admitted baloney like the couch stuff is fine because "vibes".
Don't they know she is the candidate of JOY? Don't ask for pesky details.
Also not 6 weeks ago people on this very forum were suggesting how to dump Harris because she was considered an election liability for her poor performance. Your ability to hairpin turn is astounding.

No one actually thinks that JD Vance F**** sofas or dolphins, you know that, right? We are approaching the Republican ticket with the level of seriousness with which they treat policy or women’s autonomy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess the barrage of Daily Mail links telling us half-truths about Harris and hoping something sticks is now coming our way.

Half truths, right. But full-on admitted baloney like the couch stuff is fine because "vibes".
Don't they know she is the candidate of JOY? Don't ask for pesky details.
Also not 6 weeks ago people on this very forum were suggesting how to dump Harris because she was considered an election liability for her poor performance. Your ability to hairpin turn is astounding.

No one actually thinks that JD Vance F**** sofas or dolphins, you know that, right? We are approaching the Republican ticket with the level of seriousness with which they treat policy or women’s autonomy.

So you’re equating couch humping to baby killing?

[Anonymous]

The nation at large does not subscribe to the left wing silliness of DCUM. this one is gonna be a landslide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

NEW: Kamala Harris vows to close detention centers that hold illegal immigrants "on day one" if she becomes president.

The statement completely contradicts Harris' recent push to appear as a candidate who wants a secure border.

Question: "When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"

Answer: "Absolutely, on day one."

Detention centers are currently used to hold "noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention or those that ICE determines are a public safety or flight risk during the custody determination process." (ICE)

Harris wants to release them into the public.

Yes, the privately run ones that were holding children. Like private prisons, they were being run for profit and not for justice.

What is wrong with you? Can you not find anything of substance to bring to the table, without either directly lying or editing to obscure truth?

That is NOT what she said. The question that was asked was ""When you become president, would you be committing to close the immigration detention centers?"
Her response was "Absolutely!"

That's why you had to present it out of the context, you knob.

If I'm at a school board meeting and ask if "the president" will be available for questions, does anyone really wonder if I think POTUS is coming through the doors next? What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The nation at large does not subscribe to the left wing silliness of DCUM. this one is gonna be a landslide.

How lovely for you. Time to sit back on your laurels and relish the thought, eh?

Everyone else, check your voter registration at Vote.GOV (or Vote.ORG) and make sure it stays legally active. Do more if you can; there is much work to be done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess the barrage of Daily Mail links telling us half-truths about Harris and hoping something sticks is now coming our way.

Half truths, right. But full-on admitted baloney like the couch stuff is fine because "vibes".
Don't they know she is the candidate of JOY? Don't ask for pesky details.
Also not 6 weeks ago people on this very forum were suggesting how to dump Harris because she was considered an election liability for her poor performance. Your ability to hairpin turn is astounding.

No one actually thinks that JD Vance F**** sofas or dolphins, you know that, right? We are approaching the Republican ticket with the level of seriousness with which they treat policy or women’s autonomy.

So you’re equating couch humping to baby killing?

See this? This is why you are going to lose by so, so much.

[Anonymous]

These last bunch of posts have shown me once again just how weird Republicans are.

[Anonymous]

Don't go back. There is so much good ahead for our country.

[Anonymous]

She is for mandatory confiscation.

[Anonymous]

She supports a tax on unrealized capital gains.

Americans Overwhelmingly Reject Harris-Biden Unrealized Capital Gains Wealth Tax |

The 2025 Biden budget proposes to tax long-term capital gains and qualified dividends at ordinary income tax rates for taxable income above $1 million and tax unrealized capital gains at death above a $5 million exemption ($10 million for joint filers). If this tax proposal went through, investors would flee the stock market and potentially create a stock market crash effecting even pensions of middle class Americans.