DP. If a 14 yr old raped and murdered your 8 yr old, you’d want them locked up for good. Don’t pretend otherwise. |
Exactly. I can’t believe this is even a discussion. |
Which is why the law doesn’t apply to violent offences. Nice try though! |
She doesn't have a strong record as a prosecutor.
Kamala Harris played a key role in California’s crime catastrophe — voters should be very worried
https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/opinion/kamala-harris-played-a-key-role-in-californias-crime-catastrophe-voters-should-be-very-worried/ |
And why they have embraced child labor again. Who cares if a few kids lose limbs or fall into vats, there’s money to be made for shareholders! I don’t think anyone should listen to or engage with the same people who think that Donald Trump’s trial was a… what did they call it? A “kangaroo court”? A “political attack”? They’re also the same people who argue that Trump isn’t a convicted felon because he hasn’t been sentenced. They’re a “rules for thee and not for me” group. |
Yeah, I'd want him tried in a court of law and punished. I'd want him locked up forever, and maybe this is the difference between us -- I'd want him tried and convicted with all due process so there was no room for appeal. Tell, what are you really trying to do? Why are you afraid of the legal process? |
It's so lame. And it's not serious at all, just monkeys flinging poo. |
I'd want them tried in a court of law, by due process with every single i dotted and t crossed, especially for anything that could give him a chance to go free again. WHy is that not what you want? Do you want him to go free? |
The dems support open borders where cartels use child labor for child drug trafficking and even child sex trafficking. The Dems have no problem with this |
Right, we already went over that. This is some guy's unverified Google Drive, and that makes you very lame. Catch up. |
You are not understanding Prop 57. Nothing says they can be locked up without a trial (unless of course it is pre-trial detention - which this case would certainly warrant.) It now requires an extra step - a hearing in a juvenile court before the accused can be tried in an adult court. I happen to think that is ridiculous. If the crime is as heinous as this one was, he should be tried as an adult. Here is the change in Prop 57: Proposition 57 Would Require Youth to Have a Hearing in Juvenile Court Before They Could Be Transferred to Adult Court Under current state law, youth ages 14 to 17 who are accused of certain crimes can be tried in adult court. In some circumstances, state law requires the juvenile to be tried as an adult. In other situations, prosecutors have the discretion to directly file charges against a youth in adult court. In the remaining cases, a juvenile court judge decides — if so requested by a prosecutor — whether a youth should be transferred to adult court. Prop. 57 would amend state law to require youth to have a hearing in juvenile court before they could be transferred to adult court for prosecution. As a result, under Prop. 57, “the only way a youth could be tried in adult court is if the juvenile court judge in the hearing decides to transfer the youth to adult court,” according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO). In addition, the measure would allow prosecutors to seek transfer hearings only for 16- and 17-year-olds accused of committing a felony, or for 14- and 15-year-olds accused of committing certain crimes outlined in state law, including murder, kidnapping, arson, and certain sex offenses. |
Citation: https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/understanding-proposition-57/#:~:text=Proposition%2057%20Would%20Require%20Youth,be%20tried%20in%20adult%20court. |
Of course. That’s why judges sentence criminals rather than the families of victims. There is more at stake in criminal justice than the desire for revenge by those who were harmed. |