Riverbend FC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coach Fadia is already there isn’t she? With the futsal club that’s part of it

she hasn't informed her gfr teams that she's leaving for the spring at least.

give it a bit

that's crazy if more coaches are leaving btwn fall and spring at gfr - such a terrible way to treat the families that have trusted you

she is coaching her GFR teams at practice this week.

Which is consistent w/the rumor that she plans to stay through spring, but if GFR has different plans, I wish they would make them sooner than later. Gotta say, not really interested in my kid being coached by someone with one foot out the door. My player has no interest in following her, so it's hard to see how that wouldn't impact her GFR coaching decisions if she does stick around.

It isn't likely GFR that has other plans. FA is the one who has been d*cking around with Phoenix futsal and telling people she might leave so if she's gone, it's either her own choice or the result of her actions. GFR will be fine whether she stays or goes. They're adding some great coaches to their slate for next year based on what we've heard. NM is finally getting to run this club as the TD now with RS gone!

So he doesn't coach for Bethesda any more?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Coach Fadia is already there isn’t she? With the futsal club that’s part of it

she hasn't informed her gfr teams that she's leaving for the spring at least.

give it a bit

that's crazy if more coaches are leaving btwn fall and spring at gfr - such a terrible way to treat the families that have trusted you

she is coaching her GFR teams at practice this week.

Which is consistent w/the rumor that she plans to stay through spring, but if GFR has different plans, I wish they would make them sooner than later. Gotta say, not really interested in my kid being coached by someone with one foot out the door. My player has no interest in following her, so it's hard to see how that wouldn't impact her GFR coaching decisions if she does stick around.

It isn't likely GFR that has other plans. FA is the one who has been d*cking around with Phoenix futsal and telling people she might leave so if she's gone, it's either her own choice or the result of her actions. GFR will be fine whether she stays or goes. They're adding some great coaches to their slate for next year based on what we've heard. NM is finally getting to run this club as the TD now with RS gone!

So he doesn't coach for Bethesda any more?

couldn't care less as long as he's doing his job at GFR

[Anonymous]

Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

Oh please stop with making sense and solid points! That’s not what anyone is here for

[Anonymous]

They are now basically posting parodies of their other posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are now basically posting parodies of their other posts.

riverbend ya ova?

Riverbend busy?

Riverbend joking?

Ok ill see myself out. Couldn’t resist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

Is GFR also a cuckold (or cuckquean) FC because of the GFR coach(es) affiliated with RbFC and its subsidiaries like Phoenix Futsal. Does Phoenix compete against GFR in futsal? Are the coach(es) working for both advocating equally for the future of both? What are those coach(es) telling the players to do next year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

The TD is not in Florida secretly. Totally disagree that he is doing "nothing" (=0?) for GFR when he is there.

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who coaches ECNL teams at national events and thus knows first hand what players need to be competitive at higher levels? Does none of that translate into the coaching approach/style/strategies that he brings to GFR (not just his teams)? Is there 0 value in him staying current in that direct knowledge?

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who has and continues to build relationships with other coaches at that event, both at the ECNL and college level? No, I'm not implying that those relationships translate directly to GFR teams right now but it does uniquely position him and the club to develop players -- those who want it, which isn't everyone -- in the right direction to be competitive for clubs at that level.

I'd love to hear the argument why that is doing nothing for the club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

The TD is not in Florida secretly. Totally disagree that he is doing "nothing" (=0?) for GFR when he is there.

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who coaches ECNL teams at national events and thus knows first hand what players need to be competitive at higher levels? Does none of that translate into the coaching approach/style/strategies that he brings to GFR (not just his teams)? Is there 0 value in him staying current in that direct knowledge?

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who has and continues to build relationships with other coaches at that event, both at the ECNL and college level? No, I'm not implying that those relationships translate directly to GFR teams right now but it does uniquely position him and the club to develop players -- those who want it, which isn't everyone -- in the right direction to be competitive for clubs at that level.

I'd love to hear the argument why that is doing nothing for the club.

+1000. The people who tend to complain about this are not the same people who have these coaches for their teams. Ironically they are the same people who supported Super Mario’s efforts to oust these coaches, which is directly responsible for the situation they are now complaining about. As long as people are meeting their obligations to GFR and are transparent with the club about what else is on their plate (ehem, not secretly redirecting players to their secret competing futsal club) I have no problem with it whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

The TD is not in Florida secretly. Totally disagree that he is doing "nothing" (=0?) for GFR when he is there.

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who coaches ECNL teams at national events and thus knows first hand what players need to be competitive at higher levels? Does none of that translate into the coaching approach/style/strategies that he brings to GFR (not just his teams)? Is there 0 value in him staying current in that direct knowledge?

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who has and continues to build relationships with other coaches at that event, both at the ECNL and college level? No, I'm not implying that those relationships translate directly to GFR teams right now but it does uniquely position him and the club to develop players -- those who want it, which isn't everyone -- in the right direction to be competitive for clubs at that level.

I'd love to hear the argument why that is doing nothing for the club.

+1000. The people who tend to complain about this are not the same people who have these coaches for their teams. Ironically they are the same people who supported Super Mario’s efforts to oust these coaches, which is directly responsible for the situation they are now complaining about. As long as people are meeting their obligations to GFR and are transparent with the club about what else is on their plate (ehem, not secretly redirecting players to their secret competing futsal club) I have no problem with it whatsoever.

If the poster who called GFR a cuckold FC and claimed GFR's TD is doing nothing for the club while he is in FL is part of the RbFC leadership team:
- precision of language, please. All or nothing are generally pretty hard bars to meet. What was it you were actually trying to say?
- it seems like you want 100% loyalty and attention/focus on one club, which might indeed be possible for ulittles! What is RbFC's plan after the ulittles grow out of ulittles? Where are your relationships going to be get them to the higher levels? Or are you going to have all of that in house?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

The TD is not in Florida secretly. Totally disagree that he is doing "nothing" (=0?) for GFR when he is there.

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who coaches ECNL teams at national events and thus knows first hand what players need to be competitive at higher levels? Does none of that translate into the coaching approach/style/strategies that he brings to GFR (not just his teams)? Is there 0 value in him staying current in that direct knowledge?

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who has and continues to build relationships with other coaches at that event, both at the ECNL and college level? No, I'm not implying that those relationships translate directly to GFR teams right now but it does uniquely position him and the club to develop players -- those who want it, which isn't everyone -- in the right direction to be competitive for clubs at that level.

I'd love to hear the argument why that is doing nothing for the club.

I don’t think you have a grasp for the time commitment coaching ECNL teams requires. It’s not like RL, not even close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously. What's the worst thing that could happen? He gives a GFR an opportunity at BSC? Pretty unlikely to even happen but if there are players that are good enough to play ECNL they'll leave GFR eventually anyway.

Right, this complaint is so brain-dead.

GFR tops out at ECNL-RL. Bethesda is ECNL. Also, they play in different conferences and have different seasons. Also, as far as I can tell, neither NM nor ML coach the same age groups at both clubs. Also, they are good and very intentional about deconflicting schedules even though there is occasional overlap. Also, there is benefit in ECNL-RL girls having coaches familiar with the ECNL landscape. Also, they are really great coaches focused on developing strong players and teams that can play at higher levels (if you give them the chance).

LOL. Cuckold FC. Your TD is off in Florida this week, doing nothing for your club, and you all want to spin that as a positive.

The TD is not in Florida secretly. Totally disagree that he is doing "nothing" (=0?) for GFR when he is there.

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who coaches ECNL teams at national events and thus knows first hand what players need to be competitive at higher levels? Does none of that translate into the coaching approach/style/strategies that he brings to GFR (not just his teams)? Is there 0 value in him staying current in that direct knowledge?

Is there 0 value for GFR in having a TD who has and continues to build relationships with other coaches at that event, both at the ECNL and college level? No, I'm not implying that those relationships translate directly to GFR teams right now but it does uniquely position him and the club to develop players -- those who want it, which isn't everyone -- in the right direction to be competitive for clubs at that level.

I'd love to hear the argument why that is doing nothing for the club.

I don’t think you have a grasp for the time commitment coaching ECNL teams requires. It’s not like RL, not even close.

That is highly dependent on the coach, club, and conference. NM and ML's GFR RL teams practice a lot, are successful, seem content with them as coaches, and have lived with them coaching ECNL teams for going on two years now. You never see them complaining on here. It's always people uninvolved with personal axes to grind that complain.