+1 My nephew's ex tried to keep the kid away from him. He begged/borrowed money to hire a lawyer to fight her because he loves his kid and wants them in his life. He even moved to be closer. I cannot imagine giving up being able to see my kids. I'd fight tooth and nail and bankrupt myself to keep my kids in my life. |
I can answer from someone close to someone who did it. He did it for a hot young woman and s** and to get away from the ex-wife who tarnished his reputation when he cheated on her (not with the second wife, but with one of her close friends and neighbors - the mother of his sons' teammates), and "alienated" his children from him. Then he met someone new, fed her a load of crap about how his first wife is the "devil", had a few kids, and became bitter, angry, and abusive toward his second wife, whom he blamed for his strained relationship with his first set of kids. Now he and his second wife are divorcing, and his version of parenting his younger kids is to hire a full-time nanny who watches them from school pickup to 10 pm, and stays with them over the weekend. Most likely, you didn't get the worst of him. His second wife did. |
** That was unclear. He cheated with one of his first wife's close friends, who was their neighbor and the parent of his kids' teammate. He also cheated on his second wife, no surprise. |
But it was all the ex wives' faults!! He's secretly an amazing father and all the women/baby mommas are the evil devils!
|
You might want to take some time to do some independent research next time. Didn't you see him abandoning his family as a red flag? |
Sometimes, intelligent women make poor choices when picking a partner. "The most dangerous place for a woman is in her own home," and "a woman is most likely to be killed by her husband/boyfriend than anyone else." If you've never been the victim of domestic violence or volunteered to help victims of domestic violence, it might be hard to understand. None of us is immune to making poor choices; it's just that choosing the wrong partner is the most costly choice a woman can make. |
My friend is an idiot, and so I am, because his ex-wife took his passport out of his desk? You have some serious issues. I really hope you're able to get help for them. |
He's been fighting for months and won't give up. He's spent six figures on legal fees already. But no, I must be lying, because men suck and women never do anything wrong. I'm a woman, by the way, and I think his wife is awful for what she's doing to the kid and to him. Sorry that doesn't fit your narrative. You are SO angry. I wonder again who hurt you. |
You are in fact an idiot. An idiot for believing this BS story. And an idiot for not knowing that all he had to do was repot it stollen and get a new one. So you're a liar and a moron and possibly both. |
HAHAHAHAHAHA OK. Please seek help. |
I guess the passport poster is long gone, so I'll respond. Under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, the federal government can deny a passport when a parent owes more than $2500 in back child support. Child support agencies in all 50 states submit information on parents who meet the criteria for passport denial to the federal Office of Child Support Services (OCSS), which forwards those names to the Department of State. The State Department's current official website states: "If you owe $2,500 or more in child support, you are not eligible to receive a U.S. passport" -- https://oag.dc.gov/passport-denial Who's the idiot now? |
The poster is claiming that the ex-wife hid the passport. Not that she went through the proper channels to garnish it, which of course is true and of course I know about. So, still you. |
I love the inevitable idiotic response when you've been had. |
Highly doubt it. If so he could file for a duplicate passport. More likely, it was taken through proper channels. |
OMG it's literally what I said in RESPONSE to pp claiming that the wife did not go through the proper channel and simply hid the passport. Please learn how to read. |