The greater than (> in Langley > Madison is a prediction for Langley.
Which means we each predicted 2 winners, and me scores were closer. And me last prediction was a joke. If my competitor gets a +, seems like I should get a ++. Tho 2 wins shouldn't likely give anyone a +. |
It was the other way around Indy maybe had 16 players and BI had 20+. BI got some great goalie play or the game would have been worse. D was the problem and allowed cutters all over the crease seemed like no D communication. BI O was a bit stagnant and mostly scored on transition. I believe they lost about every FO too. |
I will reevaluate- PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9 Close (++) 1 goal off Langley > Madison by 3 (++) 2 goal off Yorktown in braveheart Miss (--) 3 goal off and wrong winner BI over Indy 7 to 5. swing and miss (---) 8-10 goals off and wrong winner Will give you a (-). I can see how the Langley score was written funny and I even had a question, but just used your words as you used in the PVI post- "PVI by 9" and "Madison by 3". Excuse my mistake but you used 3 different formats to predict. Will not give credit for the BI/Indy game. You wrote what you wrote and I am not a mind reader to know when you are making a joke. Be clearer or indicate you are joking and make a real prediction. In the end your opponent beat you slightly, by dumb luck, in calling one game on the nose. My grading scale- One +/- for calling the right winner One +/- for calling within two goals One +/- for calling exact score or being more then 5 off Add up the +/- and that is the score |