Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it’s actually much simpler than that. We don’t like drunks. We don’t like sexual assaulters. And, we don’t like rapists.
We also don’t like for ANYBODY to be convicted, even in the court of public opinion, when there is no hard evidence to support the accusation. And, we don’t like mobs dragging a good man’s name through the mud simply because they “believe her” even when there is unsubstantiated and uncorroborated evidence. And, we don’t like this good man’s family being a target of mocking. And, we don’t like mobs of people accosting elected officials because THEY think they have a larger 1st Amendment right to do so.

His what name? He cut his teeth dogging the Clintons, harassing the Foster family. Did you mind all that mocking he helped subject the families to? His background check for his first judgeship took 30 months and he only got pushed through at W’s personal request. He perjured himself in 2006, to say nothing of his hearing this summer. He has no good name, and it is all his own doing.

Also, there are three accusations against him. I wonder how many you’d need to begin to suspect that maybe, perhaps, possibly Brett isn’t quite so well behaved as you’d like to suspect.

One credible one would suffice. We have not seen that.

You haven’t seen Dr. Christine Blasey Ford? I envy you the tropical island you found to hide on these last few weeks.

Emotional testimony does not equal credible. A 36-year old allegation with no corroborating evidence presented is not credible. The people she claims were present all having no knowledge of the event is not credible. Her best friend stating she doesn’t know Kavanaugh is not credible. Not knowing where, when, how she got there and how she got home is not credible.

Several memory/trauma experts have weighed in on this and said that this is actually plausible. Kavanaugh supporters have chosen to ignore or dismiss the opinion of subject matter experts.

Plausible? Maybe. Tell me why nobody has come forward to say they drove her home. Tell me why none of those in attendance have any memory of the event. Tell me why Leland, her best friend at the time, doesn’t know Kavanaugh. Tell me why she could leave Leland alone with 4 boys, two of which allegedly just tried to rape/accidentally kill her. Tell me why she can remember running to the street and thinking how happy she was that she got away but was not bothered enough with thinking about how in the hell she was going to get home. Tell me why Leland and she never discussed this event after she left so abruptly.
There are just way too many holes in her story to make it credible.

Well, it is on Kavanaugh’s calendar. Besides, no one else was almost raped, why would they remember a party three decades ago? You seem not that logical.

It is NOT on his calendar. The July 1 party at Timmy’s was in Rockville—11 miles from CCC. This has been established. Her boyfriend at the time was also there. How does that fly??

Well, according to you crazies , he was the rapist.

Was at Timmy's grandmothers house that was empty...3333 Tenneyson Street, NW, about a mile from the club.

That was Mark Judge’s grandmother’s house. 1 mile from Columbia, older colonial that definitely could have had the narrow staircase, bathroom bedroom at top of stairs.

But the calendar says Timmy's.....

[Anonymous]

Funny, the part of the testimony Kavanaugh is apologizing (but not apologizing) for were his prepared remarks. I mean, I guess he thinks we are that stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yes, I remember the time the press ran article after article about him being a gang rapist and the Senate dragged him in for hearings and hours of testimony about sexually assaulting and gang raping women at high school parties. Obama really kept his cool in the face of all that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett Kavanaugh in today's Wall Street Journal. Food for thought.

"I was very emotional last Thursday, crying and sniveling and making weird wrinkled-nose faces like a little bitch-man. I might have been too emotional at times, but that's me, a bitchy little pansy. I know that my tone was douchey, and unfortunately I said a few things that show the type of person I really am. I hope everyone can understand that I really, really want to be on the Supreme Court. It would be so awesome and I totally promise to do all of Trump's bidding and make sure he can operate outside the law. Seriously, whatever you want, I'll do it. Anyway, I testified with five people foremost in my mind: Squi, Judge, TK, Bernie, and Tobin. p.s. I never bagged Renate, cos I was virgin 'til I was 26, but I wanted all the guys to think I did."

You are a very angry man.

So, the left throws mud at him - calls him a sexual assaulter, a gang rapist, an alcoholic, a liar, a wife beater, a wife cheater, an attempted murderer, and one publication insinuated he was a pedophile.
And, you expect him to just sit there and take it? No way in hell. He fought back. He was angry. And, he had every damn right to be.

I remember many here saying, after the Martha McCallum interview, that he was robotic.

His reaction will never be appropriate in your eyes.

Well said. thank you!

+1 If he had sat there an calmly presented his case they would have said he had no conviction or seemed like a sociopath.

[Anonymous]

Alexandra Petri (@petridishes) FTW:

“Yes, I was emotional last Thursday. I hope everyone can understand I was there as a son, husband and dad.”
“Sir this is an Arby’s”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yep. It’s almost like Obama has a calm, cool temperment perfect for the Supreme Court. But nooooo we get Turd Ferguson.

[Anonymous]

Republicans happily support a president who lies multiple times on a daily basis and, as the recent NY Times article confirms, has a long and sordid history of being a white collar crook and fraudster.

Now they support a SCOTUS nominee who has a proven track record of lying under oath, from his knowledge of stolen emails to his demeanor and character in high school and college.

They can never again stake any kind of claims to being the party of honesty and integrity. Because they obviously don't care about such things and outright reject it.

[Anonymous]

Everything you need to know about Brett Kavanaugh in this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsuutbTgeuM

You all probably know this is him rebuffing a Parkland parent's efforts to shake his hand. The way he does it shows what type of person he is - great with people in his circle or people he needs in his circle, and the rest can FOAD.

That's why he can treat Dem senators the way he did.
Why he can go after outskirts girls the way he did.
Why he can get be a mean drunk but a kind friend.
& Etc.

Justice Kavanaugh will be a protector of His Kind, and those who happen to benefit from same.
Woe to the rest of us.
Would rather have nine Thomases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yes, I remember the time the press ran article after article about him being a gang rapist and the Senate dragged him in for hearings and hours of testimony about sexually assaulting and gang raping women at high school parties. Obama really kept his cool in the face of all that.

Wahhh libruls were mean to a lying douchey white guy wahhh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yep. It’s almost like Obama has a calm, cool temperment perfect for the Supreme Court. But nooooo we get Turd Ferguson.

I pray to god that the Democratic president nominates Obama to the court in 2021.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it’s actually much simpler than that. We don’t like drunks. We don’t like sexual assaulters. And, we don’t like rapists.
We also don’t like for ANYBODY to be convicted, even in the court of public opinion, when there is no hard evidence to support the accusation. And, we don’t like mobs dragging a good man’s name through the mud simply because they “believe her” even when there is unsubstantiated and uncorroborated evidence. And, we don’t like this good man’s family being a target of mocking. And, we don’t like mobs of people accosting elected officials because THEY think they have a larger 1st Amendment right to do so.

His what name? He cut his teeth dogging the Clintons, harassing the Foster family. Did you mind all that mocking he helped subject the families to? His background check for his first judgeship took 30 months and he only got pushed through at W’s personal request. He perjured himself in 2006, to say nothing of his hearing this summer. He has no good name, and it is all his own doing.

Also, there are three accusations against him. I wonder how many you’d need to begin to suspect that maybe, perhaps, possibly Brett isn’t quite so well behaved as you’d like to suspect.

One credible one would suffice. We have not seen that.

You haven’t seen Dr. Christine Blasey Ford? I envy you the tropical island you found to hide on these last few weeks.

Emotional testimony does not equal credible. A 36-year old allegation with no corroborating evidence presented is not credible. The people she claims were present all having no knowledge of the event is not credible. Her best friend stating she doesn’t know Kavanaugh is not credible. Not knowing where, when, how she got there and how she got home is not credible.

Several memory/trauma experts have weighed in on this and said that this is actually plausible. Kavanaugh supporters have chosen to ignore or dismiss the opinion of subject matter experts.

Plausible? Maybe. Tell me why nobody has come forward to say they drove her home. Tell me why none of those in attendance have any memory of the event. Tell me why Leland, her best friend at the time, doesn’t know Kavanaugh. Tell me why she could leave Leland alone with 4 boys, two of which allegedly just tried to rape/accidentally kill her. Tell me why she can remember running to the street and thinking how happy she was that she got away but was not bothered enough with thinking about how in the hell she was going to get home. Tell me why Leland and she never discussed this event after she left so abruptly.
There are just way too many holes in her story to make it credible.

Well, it is on Kavanaugh’s calendar. Besides, no one else was almost raped, why would they remember a party three decades ago? You seem not that logical.

It is NOT on his calendar. The July 1 party at Timmy’s was in Rockville—11 miles from CCC. This has been established. Her boyfriend at the time was also there. How does that fly??

Well, according to you crazies , he was the rapist.

Was at Timmy's grandmothers house that was empty...3333 Tenneyson Street, NW, about a mile from the club.

That was Mark Judge’s grandmother’s house. 1 mile from Columbia, older colonial that definitely could have had the narrow staircase, bathroom bedroom at top of stairs.

But the calendar says Timmy's.....

Didn't Inside Edition show the same model townhouse next to Timmy's townhome? I thought that was the house? I watched the video and thought it matched.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never saw Obama lose his temper like that. And we all know the kind of trash that was thrown at him.

Yep. It’s almost like Obama has a calm, cool temperment perfect for the Supreme Court. But nooooo we get Turd Ferguson.

I pray to god that the Democratic president nominates Obama to the court in 2021.

Someone who has never practiced law, argued a case, or served as a judge?

[Anonymous]

The Washington Post EDITORIAL BOARD - which is CONSERVATIVE and has not opposed a Supreme Court nominee since Bork (PRO Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, etc.) - comes out AGAINST JUSTICE BRETT https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-no-on-kavanaugh/2018/10/04/23495e3a-c7f3-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html?utm_term=.ee08885fa601

[Anonymous]

For those claiming that Professor Ford’s allegation is merely he said she said this article makes some good points: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/why-i-wouldnt-confirm-brett-kavanaugh/571936/

Kavanaugh’s calendar has a get together with the people Ford claimed were at the party. Ford knew that Mike Judge worked at a local Safeway. Ford knew who Kavanaugh’s friends were. Her allegation does not fall apart. A made up allegation would fall apart, there would be some detail that wouldn’t stand up to scrutiny.

[Anonymous]

And we have still only seen 3% of the documents related to Kavanaugh in the National Archives.