Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's your answer Valentine. Next time don't go up against a powerhouse like Jenny Afia.

She has not sued him, so we know he is right.

In fact, every time she does not sue we can all assume the story is factual.

That's... not how litigation works.

Unless you're in agreement that anything written about anyone is true, as long as they haven't been sued?

[Anonymous]

Meghan getting or manufacturing the occasional "win" is what makes this entertaining lol. Look at how her stans are whipped into a frenzy today haha! A complete drubbing would be boring. Her delusion and persistence are necessary ingredients in this delicious cocktail. I just wish she would stop self-owning so much, when the BRF has enough ammo they can deploy by themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's your answer Valentine. Next time don't go up against a powerhouse like Jenny Afia.

She has not sued him, so we know he is right.

In fact, every time she does not sue we can all assume the story is factual.

That's... not how litigation works.

Unless you're in agreement that anything written about anyone is true, as long as they haven't been sued?

Not generally, no. But for the thin-skinned, trigger happy couple? Perhaps...

[Anonymous]

Anyone caught perjuring themselves is loser, regardless of what the court rules. Meghan and Harry will spend the rest of their lives fighting to be respected and admired. The harder the try in their respect, the more they fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone caught perjuring themselves is loser, regardless of what the court rules. Meghan and Harry will spend the rest of their lives fighting to be respected and admired. The harder the try in their respect, the more they fail.

Meghan won, and it’s not surprising that she did. There’s no point to ANL appealing. However - the release of the documents showing her lies about Finding Freedom, the characterization of her half-sister’s family, and other elements certainly showed a repellant, dishonest character. Apparently the bullying investigation is ongoing, who knows. But I don’t think a win where disclosures show one to be a real liar is an actual win. YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Episode 3 it is then. The Meghan gravy train will keep on rolling

At this point the Daily Fail editorial/board, as well as that entire island, should be sectioned for collective hysteria.

But hey...maybe the U.K. will be forced to have a written constitution after all this. Can you imagine? One woman completely changing their entire legal system.

That statement is for dumb rightwingers in both the UK and US who consume the DM but know nothing about the legal process in the UK. When the UK Supreme Court doesn't even consider the case, the DM will go on to attack and undermine the legitimacy of the courts and further radicalize their readers.

It's gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone caught perjuring themselves is loser, regardless of what the court rules. Meghan and Harry will spend the rest of their lives fighting to be respected and admired. The harder the try in their respect, the more they fail.

Meghan won, and it’s not surprising that she did. There’s no point to ANL appealing. However - the release of the documents showing her lies about Finding Freedom, the characterization of her half-sister’s family, and other elements certainly showed a repellant, dishonest character. Apparently the bullying investigation is ongoing, who knows. But I don’t think a win where disclosures show one to be a real liar is an actual win. YMMV.

All those documents, texts, e-mails, her apology were admitted as evidence and are permanent public record in the UK. ANL unmasked her as the duplicitous operator that she is. There is a reason no one wants this couple in their social circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Episode 3 it is then. The Meghan gravy train will keep on rolling

At this point the Daily Fail editorial/board, as well as that entire island, should be sectioned for collective hysteria.

But hey...maybe the U.K. will be forced to have a written constitution after all this. Can you imagine? One woman completely changing their entire legal system.

That statement is for dumb rightwingers in both the UK and US who consume the DM but know nothing about the legal process in the UK. When the UK Supreme Court doesn't even consider the case, the DM will go on to attack and undermine the legitimacy of the courts and further radicalize their readers.

It's gross.

They're treading close to fascism. But if that's what they want. More power to them.

They can keep the Orange Cheeto over there as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan getting or manufacturing the occasional "win" is what makes this entertaining lol. Look at how her stans are whipped into a frenzy today haha! A complete drubbing would be boring. Her delusion and persistence are necessary ingredients in this delicious cocktail. I just wish she would stop self-owning so much, when the BRF has enough ammo they can deploy by themselves.

Hahaha sure, Jan. You were fighting back tears as you wrote this. Try again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Episode 3 it is then. The Meghan gravy train will keep on rolling

At this point the Daily Fail editorial/board, as well as that entire island, should be sectioned for collective hysteria.

But hey...maybe the U.K. will be forced to have a written constitution after all this. Can you imagine? One woman completely changing their entire legal system.

That statement is for dumb rightwingers in both the UK and US who consume the DM but know nothing about the legal process in the UK. When the UK Supreme Court doesn't even consider the case, the DM will go on to attack and undermine the legitimacy of the courts and further radicalize their readers.

It's gross.

You apparently have no idea what the legal process in the UK is. Pray do tell, why do you think the UK Supreme Court exists? And why do you think the ANL has no right to challenge the “narrow interpretation” of the privacy law vis a vis the press’s right to free expression for matters of public interest? Who decides 2 paragraphs are ok but 5 are not?

[Anonymous]

Love to see all the tears of the haters today.

[Anonymous]

Don't care if she won or lost, do care that it's public record now that she's a lying, scheming little witch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't care if she won or lost, do care that it's public record now that she's a lying, scheming little witch.

You seem so personally invested in this. Lying, scheming little witch? I don't think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't care if she won or lost, do care that it's public record now that she's a lying, scheming little witch.

Lol…you big mad…you even broke out the witch insult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't care if she won or lost, do care that it's public record now that she's a lying, scheming little witch.

Lol…you big mad…you even broke out the witch insult.

😂🤣😂