Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[jsteele]

Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

I’m sure he’s all broken up about missing this vote...

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I repeat: not remembering these details is entirely consistent with traumatic events, in which some aspects are remembered and even reexperienced (smells, sensations, etc.) in full detail, and others are forgotten or blocked out. Please read the accounts of experts if you're interested (although I know you won't).

And, some of us are a bit tired of this excuse as a way to rationalize her total lack of evidence and corroboration.
Convenient that she herself has some background about trauma and how the memory fails sometimes, wouldn’t you say?

And yet you STILL have not provided a rationale for why and how she decided to target a man named Brett Kavanaugh and knew he had a best friend named Mike Judge and started the ruse up more than 6 years ago.

We have no proof that she named Kavanaugh as her attacker 6 years ago. She won't even release her therapist's notes despite citing them as proof of her allegations.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

Luckiest b@stard ever

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Great, I'd love to get them under oath and find out ALL about the many truths Judge K told during his testimony. Bring them on.

Although, I do wonder why, since they took the trouble to write a letter about him, they didn't vouch for the truthfulness of ALL of his testimony. Just the Devil's Triangle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

Luckiest b@stard ever

Breaking news: Trump announces that absentee voting is totally a thing.

[Anonymous]

I think it's kind of obvious why he cares about the Devil's Triangle seeing as that's on his list of "accomplishments" under his picture.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

This will be the excuse to not hold a vote this weekend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Great, I'd love to get them under oath and find out ALL about the many truths Judge K told during his testimony. Bring them on.

Although, I do wonder why, since they took the trouble to write a letter about him, they didn't vouch for the truthfulness of ALL of his testimony. Just the Devil's Triangle.

So not only do you not believe Kavanaugh, you don't believe any statements that are the least bit supportive of him.

In all likelihood, they wrote the letter about the Devils Triangle because that's the one they could speak to. They also may not want to be associated with what's going on with Kavanaugh, but didn't feel they could let this particular lie that's been spread through the media go without being addressed since they have personal experience with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

I’m sure he’s all broken up about missing this vote...

How unfortunate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one forgets where they were raped.

Who was raped in this case?

Kavanaugh. By a randy Mitch McConnell. So much shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Here is a possible wild card:

https://twitter.com/MaritsaNBCMT/status/1047980282446409729

#BREAKING @SteveDaines has a scheduling conflict this weekend. He says he'll be walking his daughter down the aisle at her Montana wedding, regardless of the #KavanaughVote that could take place this weekend. #NBCMontana #mtpol #mtnews #Kavanaugh

So a "yes" vote might be at his daughter's wedding instead of voting for Kavanaugh.

I’m sure he’s all broken up about missing this vote...

How unfortunate.

P.S.
Trump and Grassley were adamant that the vote must take place Saturday and there would be no other delays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, it’s actually much simpler than that. We don’t like drunks. We don’t like sexual assaulters. And, we don’t like rapists.
We also don’t like for ANYBODY to be convicted, even in the court of public opinion, when there is no hard evidence to support the accusation. And, we don’t like mobs dragging a good man’s name through the mud simply because they “believe her” even when there is unsubstantiated and uncorroborated evidence. And, we don’t like this good man’s family being a target of mocking. And, we don’t like mobs of people accosting elected officials because THEY think they have a larger 1st Amendment right to do so.

His what name? He cut his teeth dogging the Clintons, harassing the Foster family. Did you mind all that mocking he helped subject the families to? His background check for his first judgeship took 30 months and he only got pushed through at W’s personal request. He perjured himself in 2006, to say nothing of his hearing this summer. He has no good name, and it is all his own doing.

Also, there are three accusations against him. I wonder how many you’d need to begin to suspect that maybe, perhaps, possibly Brett isn’t quite so well behaved as you’d like to suspect.

One credible one would suffice. We have not seen that.

You haven’t seen Dr. Christine Blasey Ford? I envy you the tropical island you found to hide on these last few weeks.

Emotional testimony does not equal credible. A 36-year old allegation with no corroborating evidence presented is not credible. The people she claims were present all having no knowledge of the event is not credible. Her best friend stating she doesn’t know Kavanaugh is not credible. Not knowing where, when, how she got there and how she got home is not credible.

Several memory/trauma experts have weighed in on this and said that this is actually plausible. Kavanaugh supporters have chosen to ignore or dismiss the opinion of subject matter experts.

Plausible? Maybe. Tell me why nobody has come forward to say they drove her home. Tell me why none of those in attendance have any memory of the event. Tell me why Leland, her best friend at the time, doesn’t know Kavanaugh. Tell me why she could leave Leland alone with 4 boys, two of which allegedly just tried to rape/accidentally kill her. Tell me why she can remember running to the street and thinking how happy she was that she got away but was not bothered enough with thinking about how in the hell she was going to get home. Tell me why Leland and she never discussed this event after she left so abruptly.
There are just way too many holes in her story to make it credible.

Well, it is on Kavanaugh’s calendar. Besides, no one else was almost raped, why would they remember a party three decades ago? You seem not that logical.

A party at Timmy's was on his calendar for a particular date. But if you go way back to the initial account, Ford did not know the date, the month, or even the year. During summer was exact as she got. Therapist notes said 80's and late teens. On the written note for the polygrapher she initially wrote early 80s and then scratched out early.

No, the calendar is not corroborating evidence.

Just a coincidence that she knew exactly who he was partying with that summer? Only to closed minds.

Omg, what the hell does that prove?

[Anonymous]

Just a coincidence that she knew exactly who he was partying with that summer? Only to closed minds.


Omg, what the hell does that prove?

Proves that Kavanaugh and Ford knew each other. Kavanaugh said he didn't know Ford, yet Ford was dating one of his closest friends. That was never brought up in the hearing.