Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

And what have you done today with your time?

I wrote THREE letters! Thanks me later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

And what have you done today with your time?

I wrote THREE letters! Thanks me later.

Fan mail to Elizabeth, Charles and William?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

And what have you done today with your time?

I wrote THREE letters! Thanks me later.

Fan mail to Elizabeth, Charles and William?

Charles? Yuck! It was to my girl, Kate!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

Harry has really made a job out of being "DIANA'S SON".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

Harry has really made a job out of being "DIANA'S SON".

A middle aged man desperately clinging on to his grandmother’s titles and his mother’s legacy. How pathetic!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More letters from the Magnanimous Muppets!!

https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-letter-behalf-princess-diana-world-aids-day/

Harry has really made a job out of being "DIANA'S SON".

A middle aged man desperately clinging on to his grandmother’s titles and his mother’s legacy. How pathetic!

I agree, William is pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not Barbados. It just declared its independence.

(Great beaches by the way)

That’s the point. The Commonwealth does not want or need Barbados just as it does not want or need Prince Harry and his spouse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not Barbados. It just declared its independence.

(Great beaches by the way)

That’s the point. The Commonwealth does not want or need Barbados just as it does not want or need Prince Harry and his spouse.

Great! Then they won’t care as more and more countries leave the commonwealth. Pretty soon all that will be left is one single cold island.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

DP. They said they wanted off/out of the rota. Since the rota is the press, some people interpreted that as they wanted out of the press entirely, ie, they wanted privacy. Actually, they just wanted to dictate their press instead of being covered by the rota. Silly us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

DP. They said they wanted off/out of the rota. Since the rota is the press, some people interpreted that as they wanted out of the press entirely, ie, they wanted privacy. Actually, they just wanted to dictate their press instead of being covered by the rota. Silly us.

Exhibit 3,000 of the misinformation that continues to swirl around this couple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

The biggest invasion of their privacy came from them. They told us about their miscarriage, and peeing in the bushes, and the genetic pain brought by their family, and the racism and on and on. They never shut up. They have an opinion on everything and pay a pretty penny to disseminate it. They bring on frivolous lawsuits wasting taxpayer money for personal letters intended to make their narrative public.

No privacy was invaded in the UK, they did not like the press they got. They don’t like the free press or the first amendment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something I keep thinking about is how the number one attack against Meghan is some iteration of, "I thought she wanted privacy? Why is she in the news/speaking/opening her mouth/getting pictures taken of her?" But neither she nor Harry have EVER even spoken about it. And yet you will consistently find this criticism of them in nearly every single comment section on the internet that pertains to the Sussexes. Shows just how pervasive the toxic influence of the tabloid press can be.

People say “I thought they wanted privacy” because they have complained about the invasion of their privacy and their press coverage. The reality is worse. They have a desperate need for publicity, but whine like children when it isn’t flattering. They want to attack other people, but cry foul when they fight back. Most people revert to the “privacy” argument because they are sane people who realize that you have to take the bad with the good publicity when you choose to live a public life and publicly criticize people who are in a position to get their own side of the story out. They moved to the US because they thought they could do a better job of controlling their PR here. But that doesn’t help when you continue to do dumb things (lie to the Court, call Senators using your title, etc).

When have they ever said anything even remotely similar to, “I would like to leave the public eye” — they haven’t. Everyone is entitled to basic levels of privacy, and they’re hardly the first public figures to speak about invasions of such. It’s just nonsensical illogic.

DP. They said they wanted off/out of the rota. Since the rota is the press, some people interpreted that as they wanted out of the press entirely, ie, they wanted privacy. Actually, they just wanted to dictate their press instead of being covered by the rota. Silly us.

Exhibit 3,000 of the misinformation that continues to swirl around this couple.

Girl, that was in their stupid manifesto and website. We will pursue private sources of funding so that we don’t have to work with the Rota and other press. We will use grassroots journalists. They thought they could dictate the terms of the free press, LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. Not Barbados. It just declared its independence.

(Great beaches by the way)

That’s the point. The Commonwealth does not want or need Barbados just as it does not want or need Prince Harry and his spouse.

Great! Then they won’t care as more and more countries leave the commonwealth. Pretty soon all that will be left is one single cold island.

Duh, that's the point. The Queen has been trying to get rid of the drag from the Commonwealth countries so that they can downsize the monarchy. Try to keep up.