Whistleblower complaint released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The summary transcript is going to become the next Nunes Memo. Thoroughly disproven and discredited, and yet Trump supporters will continue to slavishly defend it.

Huh? It’s hugely damning for Trump. Why would they defend it?

because it likely isn't nearly as damning as an actual transcript or recording.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The summary transcript is going to become the next Nunes Memo. Thoroughly disproven and discredited, and yet Trump supporters will continue to slavishly defend it.

Huh? It’s hugely damning for Trump. Why would they defend it?

Because the full transcript is much more damning.

You will be disappointed. Of that, I am certain.

You’re certain about a lot of wrong things, but OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
We need to know why Ukraine was giving the former Vice President's son $600,000. per year.

What's to hide?

We need to know what income Jared, Ivanka, Eric and Junior are pulling in from all corners of the world and from whom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

The complaint was clear that they were not fully versed on Giuliani's activities. But that text message fully implicates Pompeo's State Department in this scandal. I guess Giuliani is taking everyone down with him.

Now we’ve reached the crabs in a bucket stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The summary transcript is going to become the next Nunes Memo. Thoroughly disproven and discredited, and yet Trump supporters will continue to slavishly defend it.

Huh? It’s hugely damning for Trump. Why would they defend it?

Because the full transcript is much more damning.

You will be disappointed. Of that, I am certain.

You’re certain about a lot of wrong things, but OK.

Ain’t that the truth. Why do I get the feeling that there is only one Trump supporter with the IQ of a turnip holding down the fort here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Republican and the list of all of Trump’s misdeeds from lying, misinformation, operating a bogus university, operating a bogus charity, steering govt business to his personal interests, having his kids involved in running the govt, his love and adoration for ruthless and murderous dictators, his obvious complicity with Putin, his racist comments, his hiding of his taxes, and now this. Isn’t all the enough to demonstrate to any human being of normal intelligence that something isn’t right with this guy? And yet they continue to defend his actions as purely innocent and in furtherance of him being the best President ever.

Most people agree with you. The rest watch Fox News, and since Fox News is starting to have doubts about Trump, I think they will come round too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

The complaint was clear that they were not fully versed on Giuliani's activities. But that text message fully implicates Pompeo's State Department in this scandal. I guess Giuliani is taking everyone down with him.

Now we’ve reached the crabs in a bucket stage.

Crabs in a bucket is preferable to frogs in boiling water.

[Anonymous]

It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

Did you see Hannity last night? Did you see his knuckles?

I don’t watch. Bulimia knuckles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

AOC said the ones who hadn't made time to do their job and read it should quit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

Did you see Hannity last night? Did you see his knuckles?

I don’t watch. Bulimia knuckles?

Bloody. He must have punched a wall right before going on camera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

AOC said the ones who hadn't made time to do their job and read it should quit

I don’t like her but she’s not wrong here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

It's what, 8 pages? Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

if you don't read it, you can't feel obligated to do something about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It says a lot that so many Republicans are claiming they haven’t read the whistleblower complaint when asked. They know what’s in it, but there’s no good way for them to defend Trump so they’re playing dumb.

It's what, 8 pages? Sad.

More like 3 years of idolizing the wrong God.