Prosecutor to Investigate Origins of FBI Trump-Russia Probe

[Anonymous]

Durham has expanded the scope of the investigation.

John Durham, the U.S. attorney reviewing the origins of the 2016 counterintelligence investigation into Russia and the Trump campaign, is probing a wider timeline than previously known, according to multiple senior administration officials.

Fox News previously reported that Durham would be reviewing the days leading up to the 2016 election and through the inauguration.


However, based on what he has been finding, Durham has expanded his investigation adding agents and resources, the senior administration officials said. The timeline has grown from the beginning of the probe through the election and now has included a post-election timeline through the spring of 2017, up to when Robert Mueller was named special counsel.

Attorney General Bill Barr and Durham traveled to Italy recently to talk to law enforcement officials there about the probe and have also had conversations with officials in the U.K. and Australia about the investigation, according to multiple sources familiar with the meetings.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-investigation-trump-campaign-surveillance-expanded-scope

[Anonymous]

Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

LOL. Sure. That is what Durham is doing. /s

I like the "based on what he is finding..." part.
This means this investigation was actually necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

LOL. Sure. That is what Durham is doing. /s

I like the "based on what he is finding..." part.
This means this investigation was actually necessary.

Lol ok buddy. I mean based on all the indictments they are issuing I’m sure there are a lot of crimes here. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

LOL. Sure. That is what Durham is doing. /s

I like the "based on what he is finding..." part.
This means this investigation was actually necessary.

Lol ok buddy. I mean based on all the indictments they are issuing I’m sure there are a lot of crimes here. /s

Patience, grasshopper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

LOL. Sure. That is what Durham is doing. /s

I like the "based on what he is finding..." part.
This means this investigation was actually necessary.

Lol ok buddy. I mean based on all the indictments they are issuing I’m sure there are a lot of crimes here. /s

Patience, grasshopper.

Yeah, it takes time to shake down people to fabricate “evidence.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Manufacturing more BS to own the libs. Just lovely.

LOL. Sure. That is what Durham is doing. /s

I like the "based on what he is finding..." part.
This means this investigation was actually necessary.

Lol ok buddy. I mean based on all the indictments they are issuing I’m sure there are a lot of crimes here. /s

Patience, grasshopper.

Yeah, it takes time to shake down people to fabricate “evidence.”

I guess that explains why it took 2 years for the "collusion" investigation....

[Anonymous]

What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

The whole "Putin" narrative is false, weak and tired.
If ANYONE was doing the work of Putin, we can look back to the one who told the Russians he would "have more flexibility" after the election.
Had Trump said that, you would have lost your marbles. But, since it was Obama - no worries.

And, BTW, your "plane of reality" may just get an adjustment in a few weeks/months when we learn more about the previous administration's and the IC involvement in our 2016 election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

The whole "Putin" narrative is false, weak and tired.
If ANYONE was doing the work of Putin, we can look back to the one who told the Russians he would "have more flexibility" after the election.
Had Trump said that, you would have lost your marbles. But, since it was Obama - no worries.

And, BTW, your "plane of reality" may just get an adjustment in a few weeks/months when we learn more about the previous administration's and the IC involvement in our 2016 election.

Never mind that Senate report. I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

The whole "Putin" narrative is false, weak and tired.
If ANYONE was doing the work of Putin, we can look back to the one who told the Russians he would "have more flexibility" after the election.
Had Trump said that, you would have lost your marbles. But, since it was Obama - no worries.

And, BTW, your "plane of reality" may just get an adjustment in a few weeks/months when we learn more about the previous administration's and the IC involvement in our 2016 election.

This is so typical. You have beaten the whole "I'll have more flexibility after the election" thing to death. When Russia took Ukraine, everything changed. Russia was no longer part of the G-8, Obama levied sanctions that proved crippling and led to Putin to unleash cyberfury on Brexit and the US. At some point, you really have to get over Obama and understand that our patriots in the intelligence community, the findings of the Mueller Report and a bi-partisan Senate report disagree with your assessment.

At some point, you have to acknowledge that every foreign policy move Trump has made, benefits Putin and Russia.

Or, you can keep harping on 2012.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

The whole "Putin" narrative is false, weak and tired.
If ANYONE was doing the work of Putin, we can look back to the one who told the Russians he would "have more flexibility" after the election.
Had Trump said that, you would have lost your marbles. But, since it was Obama - no worries.

And, BTW, your "plane of reality" may just get an adjustment in a few weeks/months when we learn more about the previous administration's and the IC involvement in our 2016 election.

Never mind that Senate report. I guess.

Ikr

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What political party are Durham and Barr? Our president, in his great and unmatched wisdom, has declared you can't investigate or make accusations against someone of another party, because of too much bias. Totally undermines the credibility of any such accusations or investigations. To quote our fearless leader, this is a scam.

LOL.
Neither Durham or Barr are conducting their investigation anonymously. I have no doubt they will have names, evidence, and statements from witnesses to back up any claims they make.

It doesn't matter what "party" they are from.

But it kind of does matter that hey they aren’t from the same plane of reality as the rest of us. And plus also, they are doing the wet work for Putin.

The whole "Putin" narrative is false, weak and tired.
If ANYONE was doing the work of Putin, we can look back to the one who told the Russians he would "have more flexibility" after the election.
Had Trump said that, you would have lost your marbles. But, since it was Obama - no worries.

And, BTW, your "plane of reality" may just get an adjustment in a few weeks/months when we learn more about the previous administration's and the IC involvement in our 2016 election.

Never mind that Senate report. I guess.

The one that primarily blamed social media companies for not noticing the Russian involvement?
I missed the part that accused Trump of collusion/conspiracy/cooperation.