The St James acquires FCV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for making my classic point with the posts above. Goes to show who’s looking for a fight, and it’s not the FCV parent in this case.

Still haven’t accepted your new club name yet have you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Being set in your ways and not teaching and employing multiple tactics is not good coaching. It is limited and arrogant. Learn to play both possession and direct. Learn to play with patience and urgency, but know when. Again, situational awareness and critical thinking skills built through disciplined practice that turns into instinct is what we want our coaches to teach and our players to learn. That is what I posted several posts back. I mistakenly said “all” clubs to emphasize my point, when I really meant “most.” How am I qualified? Watching years of youth soccer across many clubs, coaching, watching years of pro soccer, and playing for 40+ years. Watch the Liverpool victory over Barca. Good example of urgency, pressure, and direct play that shocked Barca into submission. However, we’ve also seen Liverpool possess for long stretches. Balanced play with a willingness and ability to adapt.

No disagreement there. But those players as youth players learned to play the right way and are able to switch styles as the game demands. I was referring to teaching the game to our youth players when the development curve is the steepest.

Yes agree. Not disparaging your post at all, but rather some of the possession only zealots. I agree with your prior post too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

That's not true. Comments in that chain indicated that FCV did not have a unique, club standardized style. This thread in general has been very negative toward FCV. Again, the comments were appropriate.

Let's stop re-iterating and +1ing trolling posts now, unless I'm correct and it's you who prefer to fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Being set in your ways and not teaching and employing multiple tactics is not good coaching. It is limited and arrogant. Learn to play both possession and direct. Learn to play with patience and urgency, but know when. Again, situational awareness and critical thinking skills built through disciplined practice that turns into instinct is what we want our coaches to teach and our players to learn. That is what I posted several posts back. I mistakenly said “all” clubs to emphasize my point, when I really meant “most.” How am I qualified? Watching years of youth soccer across many clubs, coaching, watching years of pro soccer, and playing for 40+ years. Watch the Liverpool victory over Barca. Good example of urgency, pressure, and direct play that shocked Barca into submission. However, we’ve also seen Liverpool possess for long stretches. Balanced play with a willingness and ability to adapt.

No disagreement there. But those players as youth players learned to play the right way and are able to switch styles as the game demands. I was referring to teaching the game to our youth players when the development curve is the steepest.

Yes agree. Not disparaging your post at all, but rather some of the possession only zealots. I agree with your prior post too.

Why is it that the few zealots on this board seem the loudest? They pop their heads up in a few of the threads here in very obvious ways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

That's not true. Comments in that chain indicated that FCV did not have a unique, club standardized style. This thread in general has been very negative toward FCV. Again, the comments were appropriate.

Let's stop re-iterating and +1ing trolling posts now, unless I'm correct and it's you who prefer to fight.

No, they didn't. I knew the poster didn't mean FCV because of how the post was worded. So I asked which one. Stop being so insecure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

That's not true. Comments in that chain indicated that FCV did not have a unique, club standardized style. This thread in general has been very negative toward FCV. Again, the comments were appropriate.

Let's stop re-iterating and +1ing trolling posts now, unless I'm correct and it's you who prefer to fight.

No, they didn't. I knew the poster didn't mean FCV because of how the post was worded. So I asked which one. Stop being so insecure.

Again, my post was not an attack on anyone, it was simply an observation. You are the one being insecure. The poster was spreading a narrative without being able to back it up, clearly. Let's move on now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

That's not true. Comments in that chain indicated that FCV did not have a unique, club standardized style. This thread in general has been very negative toward FCV. Again, the comments were appropriate.

Let's stop re-iterating and +1ing trolling posts now, unless I'm correct and it's you who prefer to fight.

I can only laugh at the StJ FCV defender. Bash every club in every thread, throws hands up when ref doesnt blow the whistle for something you think is a foul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Sherlock Holmes, good analysis but poor data gathering. Read again. The poster did not discredit FCV, just said their club was not FCV. But we know where you play. Good lord.

Given the content of the thread and the fact that this poster decided to post here at all, I’m good with my comments and think they are appropriate. But thanks for your concern.

OMG. Just put words in their mouth and attack them. Never wrong. Always looking for a fight.

FCV = Fight Club Virginia.

For all the talk about fighting, you are the one doing the name calling. Was that your post on “Titan” as well? Very interesting personalities in this thread.

Different poster. The Titan post was weird. I was the fight club poster. I said that because you went after the poster who never even mentioned your club and refused to see how that was wrong when it was pointed out to you.

That's not true. Comments in that chain indicated that FCV did not have a unique, club standardized style. This thread in general has been very negative toward FCV. Again, the comments were appropriate.

Let's stop re-iterating and +1ing trolling posts now, unless I'm correct and it's you who prefer to fight.

I can only laugh at the StJ FCV defender. Bash every club in every thread, throws hands up when ref doesnt blow the whistle for something you think is a foul.

WTF are you talking about? Are you the author of the Titan monologue?

[Anonymous]

If you post about your club and how well they play...Fight Club Virginia parent will think you are talking bad about FCV and come after you. Psycho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you post about your club and how well they play...Fight Club Virginia parent will think you are talking bad about FCV and come after you. Psycho.

People on this site are crazy. True story.

[Anonymous]

Let’s get back to some fun. No more fighting - let’s place some bets:

Over/under on when TSJFCV informs its DA teams that all of them are training permanently in Springfield

Over/under on when TSJFCV drops FCV from its name altogether and just rolls with The St James or The St James FC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s get back to some fun. No more fighting - let’s place some bets:

Over/under on when TSJFCV informs its DA teams that all of them are training permanently in Springfield

Over/under on when TSJFCV drops FCV from its name altogether and just rolls with The St James or The St James FC

Bet that Metro United is given to St. James and they will be STJ Fairfax DA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s get back to some fun. No more fighting - let’s place some bets:

Over/under on when TSJFCV informs its DA teams that all of them are training permanently in Springfield

Over/under on when TSJFCV drops FCV from its name altogether and just rolls with The St James or The St James FC

Question 1: Mid/Late July
Question 2: Early August: when new uniforms with the new logo need to be ordered