The St James acquires FCV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parents of DA players were informed that FCV has extended their contract with Evergreen for practice and games for the 20-21 season. That should quiet some haters!

I believe the language said “long term” deal with Evergreen. That would certainly allude to being longer than 1 year.

I hope it its long term. Good luck developing a youth program next to Loudoun now that they have ECNL. Good luck to FCV with VDA taking the best that VSA develops.

They should stay in Loudoun and watch their future player pool slowly dry up.

Lol. That is like Burnley telling Liverpool they're going to take over the local player pool because they just got promoted to the EPL. Here is a thought, get your head out of your rear end and go watch some games. Maybe you will see why your post is as dumb as it gets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parents of DA players were informed that FCV has extended their contract with Evergreen for practice and games for the 20-21 season. That should quiet some haters!

I believe the language said “long term” deal with Evergreen. That would certainly allude to being longer than 1 year.

I hope it its long term. Good luck developing a youth program next to Loudoun now that they have ECNL. Good luck to FCV with VDA taking the best that VSA develops.

They should stay in Loudoun and watch their future player pool slowly dry up.

Lol. That is like Burnley telling Liverpool they're going to take over the local player pool because they just got promoted to the EPL. Here is a thought, get your head out of your rear end and go watch some games. Maybe you will see why your post is as dumb as it gets.

That doesn't make the FCV player pool any larger.

A club that cannot field B teams form U9-U11 is not a future destination club. Sending a Ulittle to FCV now would be the equivalent of investing in coal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parents of DA players were informed that FCV has extended their contract with Evergreen for practice and games for the 20-21 season. That should quiet some haters!

I believe the language said “long term” deal with Evergreen. That would certainly allude to being longer than 1 year.

I hope it its long term. Good luck developing a youth program next to Loudoun now that they have ECNL. Good luck to FCV with VDA taking the best that VSA develops.

They should stay in Loudoun and watch their future player pool slowly dry up.

Lol. That is like Burnley telling Liverpool they're going to take over the local player pool because they just got promoted to the EPL. Here is a thought, get your head out of your rear end and go watch some games. Maybe you will see why your post is as dumb as it gets.

That doesn't make the FCV player pool any larger.

A club that cannot field B teams form U9-U11 is not a future destination club. Sending a Ulittle to FCV now would be the equivalent of investing in coal.

Keep it coming. Your stupidity is entertaining.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parents of DA players were informed that FCV has extended their contract with Evergreen for practice and games for the 20-21 season. That should quiet some haters!

I believe the language said “long term” deal with Evergreen. That would certainly allude to being longer than 1 year.

I hope it its long term. Good luck developing a youth program next to Loudoun now that they have ECNL. Good luck to FCV with VDA taking the best that VSA develops.

They should stay in Loudoun and watch their future player pool slowly dry up.

Lol. That is like Burnley telling Liverpool they're going to take over the local player pool because they just got promoted to the EPL. Here is a thought, get your head out of your rear end and go watch some games. Maybe you will see why your post is as dumb as it gets.

That doesn't make the FCV player pool any larger.

A club that cannot field B teams form U9-U11 is not a future destination club. Sending a Ulittle to FCV now would be the equivalent of investing in coal.

Keep it coming. Your stupidity is entertaining.

That 32nd Ranked FCV 09 team is really gonna kick ass at DA after next year. They can't get into Jeff Cup now.

[Anonymous]

Loudoun has THREE teams ranked above FCV's top 09 team and Loudoun Silver is just one spot behind FCV at 33.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Loudoun has THREE teams ranked above FCV's top 09 team and Loudoun Silver is just one spot behind FCV at 33.

Where are you getting this information from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loudoun has THREE teams ranked above FCV's top 09 team and Loudoun Silver is just one spot behind FCV at 33.

Where are you getting this information from?

https://youthsoccerrankings.us/

[Anonymous]

Strange, I looked at the sample set of each FCV team and it looks like they changed their club name slightly to get rid of most of their sample set. Looking at the other teams, they show a few years worth of games.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Strange, I looked at the sample set of each FCV team and it looks like they changed their club name slightly to get rid of most of their sample set. Looking at the other teams, they show a few years worth of games.

It's not strange.....it's the FCV way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Strange, I looked at the sample set of each FCV team and it looks like they changed their club name slightly to get rid of most of their sample set. Looking at the other teams, they show a few years worth of games.

The site is not updated by FCV, but by posted results within tournaments and leagues.

Can you point out a ‘sample set’ in question?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Strange, I looked at the sample set of each FCV team and it looks like they changed their club name slightly to get rid of most of their sample set. Looking at the other teams, they show a few years worth of games.

Looking at the U15/2005 (Girls) and I see
2 FC VIRGINIA [88] DA 34.79
23 FC VIRGINIA TSJFCV ACADEMY NPL [817] 31.50

Looking at the U14/2006 (Girls)
1 FC VIRGINIA USSF [21] DA 35.08

Looking at the U13/2007 (Girls)
2 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [45] 32.51
11 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [413] 29.88
53 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [1867] 26.75
68 FCV ASHBURN NG07103 [2485] 25.64

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Strange, I looked at the sample set of each FCV team and it looks like they changed their club name slightly to get rid of most of their sample set. Looking at the other teams, they show a few years worth of games.

Looking at the U15/2005 (Girls) and I see
2 FC VIRGINIA [88] DA 34.79
23 FC VIRGINIA TSJFCV ACADEMY NPL [817] 31.50

Looking at the U14/2006 (Girls)
1 FC VIRGINIA USSF [21] DA 35.08

Looking at the U13/2007 (Girls)
2 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [45] 32.51
11 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [413] 29.88
53 FC VIRGINIA UNITED [1867] 26.75
68 FCV ASHBURN NG07103 [2485] 25.64

Well at U15, there is a DA team and a United team. Not sure what is wrong with listing both in the ranking. U14 only lists the DA because that is all they have. The U15 has 06s playing on it. At U13, they have several teams.

There is an email address on the ranking website to let the person know about updates. Send the person an email.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:St.James has the 9th wonder of the world in it's staff. Karen Kelser is a coach who has alot of licenses , but couldn't coach a turtle to go into its shell. Have fun!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:St.James has the 9th wonder of the world in it's staff. Karen Kelser is a coach who has alot of licenses , but couldn't coach a turtle to go into its shell. Have fun!

Well this was certainly random.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is that what we are supposed to be paying for? Very Nice Persons Though?

she's not that nice. she makes kids hate soccer. she thinks she's jose mourhino, then again, she probably has no clue who he is. she may not know what a ball is either.