Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Kavanaugh is going on Fox News to play the victim card and answer a bunch of softball questions. It will be a nice infomercial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Kavanaugh is going on Fox News to play the victim card and answer a bunch of softball questions. It will be a nice infomercial.

You might be surprised at some of the questions. He isn’t asked “what has enchanted him the most.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Kavanaugh will be on the Martha McCallum show tonight at 7:00. Some clips have already been shown.

He was a virgin through his high school and college years.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Avenatti owes $5 million in taxes. Is he being funded by liberal money (like Soros) to take down Kavanaugh?

Judge Kavenaugh very recently owed 200k in credit card debt-that debt suddenly was paid by undisclosed sources. Who is he beholden to for it? Last time I checked Avenatti wasn't trying to get on the supreme court.

There was never $200k in credit card debt. Read your talking points a little more closely.

Between 60k and 200k on multiple cards and a loan. Both accrued and paid off mysteriously.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/new-strike-against-kavanaugh-season-tickets/565022/

You do understand that "between $60k and $200k" is the check box on the form, right? If you owe $61k or $199k, you check the same box.

Did you read the article? Please tell me you don’t think the man spent $60k on baseball tickets. And his “friends” paid him back.

6 seats would be $39K a year. It asks for Total debt, so the $60k could be anything. I could see 3 guys wanting 2 seats each, one guy buying them and the other 2 paying him back later, i've done it with NFL tickets

LOL you are really grasping at straws here--And if this is for sports tix--it is completely unethical for him to be giving or sharing a season ticket package with anyone at all. It is considered buying favor with a sitting federal judge and is direct violation of the Judicial Code of Conduct, Canon 2.

[Anonymous]

Louisa Garry, the woman who made the pro-Kavanaugh ad saying she’s a teacher and Brett would be so great as a Justice has gone dark. She originally signed a statement saying she disputed Ramirez’s claims, but today she withdrew her name from that.

The Internet page with her Judicial Crisis Network video is now “not found.” https://judicialnetwork.com/videos/

It also looks like she was Kavanaugh’s “running partner” and one-time roommate. This whole story is just so full strange goings-on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of K’s classmates withdrew support from statement of support in NYer article.

https://twitter.com/ronanfarrow/status/1044333161142935553?s=21

This seems significant, one of them is Louisa Garry, who has been a vocal supporter and even appeared in his commercial.

Death threats will do that to a girl.

Source for the motivation being death threats?

+1 The only person who has been documented as having received death threats is Christine Blasey Ford (who had to move out of her house with her spouse and kids).

Are there any evidence of the threats other than her lawyer's statement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of K’s classmates withdrew support from statement of support in NYer article.

https://twitter.com/ronanfarrow/status/1044333161142935553?s=21

This seems significant, one of them is Louisa Garry, who has been a vocal supporter and even appeared in his commercial.

Here is more information that pp did not bother sharing. I wonder why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of K’s classmates withdrew support from statement of support in NYer article.

https://twitter.com/ronanfarrow/status/1044333161142935553?s=21

This seems significant, one of them is Louisa Garry, who has been a vocal supporter and even appeared in his commercial.

Here is more information that pp did not bother sharing. I wonder why?

You forgot to add what Jane Mayer now says about this:

“FYI, this means only 4 classmates are keeping their names on a statement disputing Ramirez, and two are implicated in the incident, according to her, and a third one is married to the guy who she recalls saying, "kiss it" at the party.”

Looking bad for Brett, the virgin perv.

[Anonymous]

The virgin defense is kind of funny considering none of the accusations involve PIV.

Is he defending against a charge we don't know about yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of K’s classmates withdrew support from statement of support in NYer article.

https://twitter.com/ronanfarrow/status/1044333161142935553?s=21

This seems significant, one of them is Louisa Garry, who has been a vocal supporter and even appeared in his commercial.

Here is more information that pp did not bother sharing. I wonder why?

You forgot to add what Jane Mayer now says about this:

“FYI, this means only 4 classmates are keeping their names on a statement disputing Ramirez, and two are implicated in the incident, according to her, and a third one is married to the guy who she recalls saying, "kiss it" at the party.”

Looking bad for Brett, the virgin perv.

I don’t blame those who she has implicated from disputing her account. They are defending themselves.
This article by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer is very, very thinly sourced. Not typical of their usual stuff. It would be a shame if this article destroys their credibility - given what the NY Times has said, the claims in this are questionable, at best.
How can this woman make these claims when she, herself, has told others that she can’t be sure it was Kavanaugh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The virgin defense is kind of funny considering none of the accusations involve PIV.

Is he defending against a charge we don't know about yet?

He is stating a fact. And, pretty bold considering all it would take is one woman to come out and dispute his claim.

[Anonymous]

Michael Avenatti says he and his client ( presumably the one with info on Brett boy )are going public on Thursday

[Anonymous]

But I bet he talked a good game. #douchebag


"That’s correct," Kavanaugh replied, adding that he did not have sex until "many years after" college.


[b]Kavanaugh: I was a virgin through high school and college

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408172-kavanaugh-i-was-a-virgin-through-high-school-and-college

[Anonymous]

*wedesday i meant *

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Kavanaugh will be on the Martha McCallum show tonight at 7:00. Some clips have already been shown.

He was a virgin through his high school and college years.

Call me crazy, but a man willing to perjure his way onto the court doesn’t strike me as a guy who would care too much about telling a bald faced lie on tv.