PRO-LIFE March on Washington this Friday, March22

[Anonymous]

Why did the good Lord choose to trouble these poor folks by snowing on their parade? Hee hee!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

+1,000,000

The right has, for decades, twisted this issue in the direction that allows them to feel morally superior all the while avoiding doing any real work in service of the women at the heart of the matter. You've got skills!

Do you support free contraception in schools? Have you adopted an unwanted child? How many impoverished, abused, neglected, unwanted children do you support with your time? Do you even think about the children born into lives of hell once they've left the womb? No. You don't.

It is your actions that are irresponsible and immoral.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

+1,000,000

The right has, for decades, twisted this issue in the direction that allows them to feel morally superior all the while avoiding doing any real work in service of the women at the heart of the matter. You've got skills!

Do you support free contraception in schools? Have you adopted an unwanted child? How many impoverished, abused, neglected, unwanted children do you support with your time? Do you even think about the children born into lives of hell once they've left the womb? No. You don't.

It is your actions that are irresponsible and immoral.

What is so wrong with taking responsibility for the life you create? If that risk is too great for your to handle, then don't create life. Immoral and irresponsible behavior is terminating the life that is growing inside of you because it is inconvenient in your life plans.

[Anonymous]

I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

Liberals fight any medical procedure that is mandated by law instead of recommended by a doctor. Conservatives really should, too.

[Anonymous]

Still staying the march is not canceled, lol
http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/

[Anonymous]

Watch the live stream - http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/livestream/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

Liberals fight any medical procedure that is mandated by law instead of recommended by a doctor. Conservatives really should, too.

What physician "recommends" an abortion?
Do they still take the Hypocratic oath, btw?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Some stages of human development include:

Infant
Toddler
Adolescent
And yes, fetus is a stage of development.

You do realize that all mammals have a fetus stage right? So at that stage it could be a rat, a giraffe, a kangaroo, a donkey, a dog, a cat, a platypus, a ...................

In short, fetus != human.

you 2 forgot embryo. It has the potential to form into a human after it stops relying on its host for food and nutrients.

You think "it" transforms into a human the day the OB delivers?

Stupidity at its finest.

It's called rationalization. Or perhaps complete ignorance of biology.

"Ignorance" is setting up the strawman that anyone has an abortion in the third trimester for anything other than the most devastating reasons. Ghouls.

I don't know who you are talking to, but I am the person who posted just before you. I have family members who have been in that situation (late abortion for devastating reasons). I am thankful they had the option available when they needed it. But what was lost was their baby, a human being, and we mourned and still mourn the loss of that child. Don't fucking tell me it wasn't a human being or a baby just because it was still in the womb. I also lost a pregnancy. I mourned that baby, as well. Fuck you if you are going to tell me that wasn't my baby or call it a parasite. Abortion is not something to be taken lightly, even by those of us that believe it needs to be available.

I wish we would all work harder to ensure adequate education, adequate access to effective birth contol, etc. that would prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place.

I didn't "fucking tell" you anything of the sort, so I guess fuck you, too? I didn't say it wasn't a baby, I didn't call it a parasite - you're having an argument entirely in your own head there. I say again, clearer, so maybe you needn't say "fuck you" without cause again - the anti-choice side pretends that women have third trimester abortions all the time. In no world do they.

The fuck you is to everyone on this thread dismissing babies in the womb as non-babies or non-humans. It's just bizarre and weird to claim that.

Why did you insert something about third trimester abortions into an exchange about terminology? You were totally off topic.

Not really. I bolded the part to which I was responding initially before you said, "fuck you."

And at the point that most women lose pregnancies, it is still, technically a fetus. In a world in which women's right to access birth control, let alone abortion, is in jeopardy, terminology is important. With friends, with people one knows, when someone has a miscarriage or stillbirth, duh, people call it a baby. But I'm not going to tend to an anonymous commenter's feelings on a thread discussing abortion in the same way I tend a friend or sister's feelings. Though I do hope you are not still hurting terribly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

Liberals fight any medical procedure that is mandated by law instead of recommended by a doctor. Conservatives really should, too.

What physician "recommends" an abortion?
Do they still take the Hypocratic oath, btw?

Many, many physicians in which grave malformations are discovered in the fetus or when continuing the pregnancy will kill the woman. I don't know whether to be glad you've never experienced one of these cases (or had a loved one who did) or cry that you are so cruel. Because you do sound cruel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

Liberals fight any medical procedure that is mandated by law instead of recommended by a doctor. Conservatives really should, too.

What physician "recommends" an abortion?
Do they still take the Hypocratic oath, btw?

Many, many physicians in which grave malformations are discovered in the fetus or when continuing the pregnancy will kill the woman. I don't know whether to be glad you've never experienced one of these cases (or had a loved one who did) or cry that you are so cruel. Because you do sound cruel.

+1
Cruel and dumber than a box of rocks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it so darn interesting that liberals that support abortion and feel it is right and just fight ultrasounds so vehemently. Seems to me they know it will blow their "it's not a child" BS right out of the water.

Liberals fight any medical procedure that is mandated by law instead of recommended by a doctor. Conservatives really should, too.

What physician "recommends" an abortion?
Do they still take the Hypocratic oath, btw?

The "medical procedure" to which I was referring is the ultrasound, not the abortion. Abortions, you may have noticed, aren't mandated by law. Many legislatures are trying to mandate ultrasounds.

Also, it's the Hippocratic oath.

You moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

+1,000,000

The right has, for decades, twisted this issue in the direction that allows them to feel morally superior all the while avoiding doing any real work in service of the women at the heart of the matter. You've got skills!

Do you support free contraception in schools? Have you adopted an unwanted child? How many impoverished, abused, neglected, unwanted children do you support with your time? Do you even think about the children born into lives of hell once they've left the womb? No. You don't.

It is your actions that are irresponsible and immoral.

+1000

People are more than willing to take responsibility when they have easy means of doing so. Take the Colorado experiment where they made it easier for teens to get free contraceptives. Huge reduction in teen pregnancies and a massive 42% reduction in abortions. That PROVES that liberal polices WORK. Conservative policies on the other hand only end up hurting people and making it harder. In fact, it's proof that backassward, shortsighted, uninformed conservative policies actually INCREASE the numbers of women seeking abortions.

[Anonymous]

EVERY life matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
EVERY life matters.

And every sperm is sacred.

[every sperm cell is alive, and thus "a life" - SO DON'T WASTE IT, IT'S FOR PROCREATING ONLY]