PRO-LIFE March on Washington this Friday, March22

[Anonymous]

A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

[Anonymous]

Um, this Friday is January, not March.
But I agree with you that the rights of the fetus stop where the rights of the woman begin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Um, this Friday is January, not March.
But I agree with you that the rights of the fetus stop where the rights of the woman begin.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.

[Anonymous]

YOU never had any rights over MY body, no matter your age or stage of development.

[Anonymous]

Adoption is an option.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:YOU never had any rights over MY body, no matter your age or stage of development.

+ 1,000

[Anonymous]

Seriously, you can follow you own beliefs, OP. Don't force them on others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.

What about the rights of your child?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.

What about the rights of your child?

No rights until it can live on its own, without my body. Until then my rights trump all.

[Anonymous]

Happens every year.
Stand to the right, buses-full of Catholic school kids who are brought in and enjoy their day off of school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

Forcing a mob of impressionable high schoolers to tromp around in the cold is not going to accomplish anything. It's bordering on child abuse.

[Anonymous]

Why would anyone ever want to go back to the devastation caused by pre-Roe illegal abortions that destroyed the lives of women and their families when self-abortion was attempted - often resulting in infertility, if not death. This was resolved with Roe v. Wade. No one - other than a rabid anti-sex activist - wants to bring back those days. Why else would they be proposing such barbaric measures. If a woman's reproductive rights go away, other rights will follow. They are not pro-life, they are anti-choice, for woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

Forcing a mob of impressionable high schoolers to tromp around in the cold is not going to accomplish anything. It's bordering on child abuse.

Perhaps those students want to know what the killing of a child accomplishes, which IS child abuse.

[Anonymous]

Is this the one where the pro-lifers stand on medians and assault motorists with pictures of fetuses?