Who is going to be next presidential candidate for democrats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a centrist.

I care not at all for the ICE Gestapo thugs who dragged a U.S. citizen out of his home dressed in nothing but his underpants in the middle of a freezing Minnesota winter.

I also care not at all for the Progressives trying to overwhelm this nation with immigrants, including H1B holders who are stealing jobs from hardworking intelligent American workers.

I will not vote for a Progressive Democratic candidate. The Progressives want to destroy traditional America.

I will vote for another Trump over a Progressive candidate. As awful as Trump is, he is the lesser of two evils. You don't agree? 50% of Americans agree with me.

Give me a candidate who (for example) gets rid of the H1B/OPT programs, who stops creating fake wars when the money could be better spent improving Americans' lives, who is not implicated in the Epstein Express - I will vote for him/her. I promise you that.

Have you been in a coma or are you just stupid? Your hero trump just started a war with Iran and Iran is
winning!

DP: This poster just said they are a centrist, not a Trump worshiper. You people with your personal insults and temper tantrums are why so many can't stand progressives. I know--I used to be one.

The poster is not a centrist. They are a maga trumpist republican just like you.

I am not, but you keep calling anyone who is not a flaming Progressive a Trumpster.

DP but you'd rather vote for a democracy killing corrupt debt accruing felon than a progressive who wants to what ..give everyone healthcare?

Which one is more destructive to the American way?

[Anonymous]

Also never trumpers are way more conservative than so called CC entrusts and would never vote for trump. So miss us with the fake "I'm a dem!" posts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the momentum is with Gavin Newsom. At a similar moment in time, all the momentum was with Jeb Bush.

The establishment wants what it wants. They are coalescing around Gavin Newsom as they did around Jeb Bush.

Can the establishment win is the question.

Probably. Not seeing anyone to dislodge Newsom.

Vance would trounce Newsom. There is smuch dirt on him you can barely see him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is most likely at this point?

I want a street smart dirty low down fighter who will go after every member of the trump family, trump cabinet. So, pritzker who isn't afraid of Trump or MAGA morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rubio will be the first Hispanic vp then president

That’s great. Maybe you should try reading the title of the thread?

Yeh Democrats are not going to survive the trump presidency

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rubio will be the first Hispanic vp then president

That’s great. Maybe you should try reading the title of the thread?

Yeh Democrats are not going to survive the trump presidency

MAGA morons will drink the Kool Aid when trump is and Netanyahu are tried and convicted as war criminals and profiteering. Jared and Ivanka will also be tried and convicted of profiteering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is most likely at this point?

I want a street smart dirty low down fighter who will go after every member of the trump family, trump cabinet. So, pritzker who isn't afraid of Trump or MAGA morons.

Inherited billionaire and Jewish isn't happening this cycle. So no Pritzker. Gavin Newsom is good at online trolling. But Democrats are not going to win running on California - from affordability to soft on violent crime and on and on. Voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania and Nevada and Georgia and other battleground states are not looking toward Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris and the way they run California as some kind of awesome model.

Pritzker, Newsom, and Harris are not viable candidates for the presidency.

[Anonymous]

Can California put water in the fire hydrants? Prosecute violent criminals? Pick up the trash?

BASIC functions aren't functioning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can California put water in the fire hydrants? Prosecute violent criminals? Pick up the trash?

BASIC functions aren't functioning.

Where do you live in cali that these things aren't happening?

[Anonymous]

Not like it matters. They’re all Zionist stooges, including AOC.

[Anonymous]

I wish the Dems could function as a team, develop strategic talking points, and uniformly implement a comms campaign attacking Trump, MAGA, and all elected republicans.

Dems need to directly address the nonsense the other side is doing as well as the nonsensical things Dems have done—and move away from the things we know irritate Dems, independents, and moderates.

Let’s play offense as a team rather than continue the typical Dem approach of circular firing squad peppered with mea culpa self-flagellation for not being hysterically woke.

Let’s reclaim patriotic values that herald our hardworking, innovative, melting pot past while not hyper-fixating on our obvious problematic history. Let’s be forward thinking rather than stuck on obvious past mistakes.

Let’s inspire rather than drag everyone into a negative mindset.

You know how the cardinals come together to pick the best guy to be the face of the religion? Let’s try that.

[Anonymous]

Every Dem I know is talking about affordability versus debt and corruption. Seems strategic to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every Dem I know is talking about affordability versus debt and corruption. Seems strategic to me.

Every Dem has always talked about affordability and income inequality. They always talk about the economy and how middle class families sit at the kitchen table struggling to pay bills.

And how many Americans continue to vote against their own economic self interest?

Ask yourselves why that is…because that’s the issue(s) that must be addressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every Dem I know is talking about affordability versus debt and corruption. Seems strategic to me.

“Affordability” is a code word for erasing zoning, so Wall Street owned mega developers can steamroll locals and build anything they want, wherever they want; notably data centers, heavy industrial, rental apartments and rental houses.

If either side cared about “affordability” they’d get serious about deporting the 100M illegal immigrants in the country and slow legal immigration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every Dem I know is talking about affordability versus debt and corruption. Seems strategic to me.

“Affordability” is a code word for erasing zoning, so Wall Street owned mega developers can steamroll locals and build anything they want, wherever they want; notably data centers, heavy industrial, rental apartments and rental houses.

If either side cared about “affordability” they’d get serious about deporting the 100M illegal immigrants in the country and slow legal immigration.

Anyone in the Democratic primary who is vocally a compassionate border hawk would walk away with the nomination. The big money behind Gavin (and JD Vance for that matter) would be meaningless; ex. JEB!. Bovino says there are 100M illegal immigrants in this country and the American masses are fed up with traffic, crowded schools and waiting rooms, high housing costs, undercut wages and job losses all directly related to them.