2010G BSC Coming For FVU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

Everyone knew that girls were coming. Even if those girls weren't coming, if you didn't start, you should've been looking for a new team.

[Anonymous]

I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

There were always signs, just had to know where to look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

They only had three subs because that's who would get playing time.

[Anonymous]

Keep telling yourself that...enjoy the traffic and playing less for a team that may not make playoffs from the North Atlantic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

Your BSC new coaches are well known for these sort of stuff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

Your BSC new coaches are well known for these sort of stuff

Problem is ECNL is complicit with this type of behavior by coaches, and by the time you guys/the customer figure it out your aged out and done with youth soccer. Families that have multiple kids are the ones that have a front row seat to this situation that plays out year after year and its not just BSC, there are several coaches in the area that fall into this category.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

Your BSC new coaches are well known for these sort of stuff

Problem is ECNL is complicit with this type of behavior by coaches, and by the time you guys/the customer figure it out your aged out and done with youth soccer. Families that have multiple kids are the ones that have a front row seat to this situation that plays out year after year and its not just BSC, there are several coaches in the area that fall into this category.

The unfortunate part is some of these coaches are successful in terms of wins so draw talented players and the cycle continues b/c if your a good player or the parents of a good player you either play the game or get left behind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

There were always signs, just had to know where to look.

so lawsuits?! Or nah

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

There are consequences. Seemingly those players transfers have still not been granted by ECNL. And BSC will likely face consequences too, otherwise ECNL will be declaring open season for all others across teams and clubs to do the same at will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

Happens at almost every club spots are held players aren’t told and attend ID sessions anyway. There’s nothing new here. That’s the trouble with US youth soccer. Nothing will change there’s too much money involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

Happens at almost every club spots are held players aren’t told and attend ID sessions anyway. There’s nothing new here. That’s the trouble with US youth soccer. Nothing will change there’s too much money involved.

You do realize that in other parts of the world, these player transfers do involve real money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

Happens at almost every club spots are held players aren’t told and attend ID sessions anyway. There’s nothing new here. That’s the trouble with US youth soccer. Nothing will change there’s too much money involved.

You do realize that in other parts of the world, these player transfers do involve real money?

Take it up with US soccer otherwise take a seat in the back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I called this out on here in SD that it was odd that BSC had only 3 subs for national playoffs. Now we know why they were holding 8 spots for FVU's starters, 5 have taken the offer, so yes this has been thought out since tryouts were set in March. Then dumb and dumber at FVU let them keep coaching at FVU throuhgout the summer, smh...

Your BSC new coaches are well known for these sort of stuff

What are they known for? Seems like they were with McLean/union since the beginning of ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what is so wrong. I wish there were a lawsuit to be had. You go to tryouts and assume it's relatively fair. The. You find out spots are being held for situations like this, which obviates the purpose of the tryout. Meanwhile you pay $4000 for the privilege of being assigned a team that might have nothing to do with how well you play soccer. Some might call it fraud...

There are consequences. Seemingly those players transfers have still not been granted by ECNL. And BSC will likely face consequences too, otherwise ECNL will be declaring open season for all others across teams and clubs to do the same at will.

wow… this will be an interesting issue to follow. Can the kids come bk or is it a lost season