
To the people who are legitimately worried (and I guess the Republicans who are legitimately excited)-- this is a Senate race in 2024.
Gubernatorial elections are not comparable. You can have people who are incredibly popular and beloved as governors, but then they run for Senate and the result is dictated by national politics. And, fwiw, Alsobrooks is a way better candidate than Ben Jealous (Brown was a solid candidate, but there was a tax revolt, 2014 was a terrible Democratic year nationwide, and Brown didn't take things seriously until near the end). |
Hogan is not getting teachers or unions— except maybe the cops. It’s weird and depressing how Alsobrooks completely overperformed vs expectations against Trone, will be running in a very blue state against someone who is anti-choice in a year when abortion rights are very clearly on the ballot, and all these posters are talking about how much trouble she’ll have. Hogan is the underdog here although it may be competitive and people who argue she is doomed either have an agenda or just don’t know what they are talking about. |
Yup. |
It’s obvious there are several DCUM posters focused on the Supreme Court, but I think you are overestimating how much the average moderate in say Howard or Anne Arundel or Frederick counties is focused on it. I think it’s obvious Alsobrooks will do well in MoCo and PG, but it’s the other large counties that aren’t as deep Blue as MoCo and PG that will really decide this race. |
I think you're underestimating how many people believe women should have reproductive rights, and vote accordingly. |
Trone's loss bodes well for democracy in the sense that it once again confirms that wealthy people can't just buy elections. |
|
She is anything but doomed. This will be a tough race and Hogan knows it. I’m voting for Hogan but I can see how people view her as an attractive candidate. |
+1 and this philosophy has been borne out in other states like Tennessee and Montana who had extremely popular D governors who lost races for Senate. |
He won’t vote to ban abortion. We need more senators who are sensible and willing to cross the aisle to work with the other side. He could be the new Manchin. |
Yes, he will. He has consistently, throughout his whole public life, opposed women's reproductive rights. Don't look at what he's saying right now; look at what he's done. |
Sorry, but no. Hard NO. She’s totally unfit for the job. The US Senate isn’t PG county, and you don’t send someone so woefully unprepared to the Senate. She’s going to be a laughingstock. Trone was the only serious option. A seasoned member of Congress, familiar with navigating the halls of power, and not beholden to anyone. He should’ve been the obvious, runaway choice for the Senate seat. But people got caught up in the emotion of wanting to vote for a Black woman. Any Black woman would do, in this case. Just be Black. And a woman. Qualified? What’s that mean? Who cares, right? Just vote for the Black woman. That’s what got us here. That’s it, I’m done. I’m out. I’ll NEVER vote for Hogan or any other GQP’r rethuglicans, but I’m not voting for her either. I won’t be responsible for sending someone so woefully unqualified to the Senate. |
Trone lost because he thinks throwing large amounts of money at the situation is a campaign and it's just not. He consistently turns people off the way he campaigns. He got destroyed by Alsobrooks despite spending 10x as much money. Throwing a tantrum because the person you favored in the primary lost is silly. |
+100. You can also see it in how he has refused to say anything on the topic. Maybe at some point he will try to come up with some waffley “middle ground” but the fact that he won’t give a position is an obvious sign he has extreme (for MD at least) views. |
He'll probably pull a Youngkin and try to claim 15 weeks is reasonable (it's not, for the record). |