Common Sense Gun Laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Huh. The young men with guns seems to pick on defenseless children and seniors shopping for milk and eggs. Ugly cowards.

just like all liberals love burning and looting small businesses, right? It is fascinating to see people who are so clueless and driven by emotional with so little grounding in hard cold facts.

Stay focused. We are talking about cowards blowing the brains out of defenseless victims.

After you ban guns, will you ban trucks and knives next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China

Lol. Do you ever read the links you post? From one of them.......


"As the Chenpeng school attack was followed by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the United States hours later[2][3] comparisons were drawn between the two. The difference in gun control laws between the two countries was used to explain the disparity in casualties of the school attacks"

I don't read opinions, I am just stating facts. Knife wielding crazy people have killed 8-9 kids in schools in China to the point that all schools now have guards and are fully gated in China, unlike in the US where many schools are open campus.

You posted a link in which it was explained the difference in gun control laws is used to explain why the Chinese attacks were/are so much less severe than us style massacres.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here is from CO? This Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) says you all use AR-15s against raccoons going after your chickens? Is that for real?!?!? Where I come from (New England) we had shotguns and air rifles for that type of thing.

yes, the AR-15 is illegal to hunt with quite a number of states, including Virginia, because its considered to weak to be a hunting round. The most typical hunting round in the US on game is a .308 which is a bullet that is 2x bigger than used by the AR-15.

AR-15s and the 556/223 ammunition was developed/adapted after WWII because military doctrine shifted from high lethality at range to high volume suppression so that the enemy could be pinned down by volume of fire and be destroyed by other units trough flanking or artillery/bombs.

Thank you for this explanation! My entire family owns firearms but no one has an AR-15.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here is from CO? This Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) says you all use AR-15s against raccoons going after your chickens? Is that for real?!?!? Where I come from (New England) we had shotguns and air rifles for that type of thing.

yes, the AR-15 is illegal to hunt with quite a number of states, including Virginia, because its considered to weak to be a hunting round. The most typical hunting round in the US on game is a .308 which is a bullet that is 2x bigger than used by the AR-15.

AR-15s and the 556/223 ammunition was developed/adapted after WWII because military doctrine shifted from high lethality at range to high volume suppression so that the enemy could be pinned down by volume of fire and be destroyed by other units trough flanking or artillery/bombs.

Thank you for this explanation! My entire family owns firearms but no one has an AR-15.

yes that is quite common, because the AR-15 is seen as primarily a defensive weapon because it's ammo is considered too weak for hunting. If you shoot a deer with it, it will dart away for another 500m before maybe collapsing, not what you want for hunting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Huh. The young men with guns seems to pick on defenseless children and seniors shopping for milk and eggs. Ugly cowards.

just like all liberals love burning and looting small businesses, right? It is fascinating to see people who are so clueless and driven by emotional with so little grounding in hard cold facts.

Stay focused. We are talking about cowards blowing the brains out of defenseless victims.

After you ban guns, will you ban trucks and knives next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China

Lol. Do you ever read the links you post? From one of them.......


"As the Chenpeng school attack was followed by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the United States hours later[2][3] comparisons were drawn between the two. The difference in gun control laws between the two countries was used to explain the disparity in casualties of the school attacks"

I don't read opinions, I am just stating facts. Knife wielding crazy people have killed 8-9 kids in schools in China to the point that all schools now have guards and are fully gated in China, unlike in the US where many schools are open campus.

You posted a link in which it was explained the difference in gun control laws is used to explain why the Chinese attacks were/are so much less severe than us style massacres.

ok, so if this was China instead of the US, 9 kids die from a crazy with a knife instead of a gun.
will you push for knife control now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Your cosplay boys will crap their pants when the US military gets involved.

2/3 of the military is useless here, aka airforce and navy.
of the army/marines/sof components, roughly 2/3 are logistics while 1/3 are combat arms.
the profile for that group are 18-25 year old male who comes from rural areas.
I'll leave it to you to guess their political leanings.

the airforce can take out whole cities. but some targeted drone hits will probably get the job done.

Major Harper on day 1 of Aerospace Studies to us AS100's. "The Air Force can not occupy the ground. You need boots on the ground for that."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Huh. The young men with guns seems to pick on defenseless children and seniors shopping for milk and eggs. Ugly cowards.

just like all liberals love burning and looting small businesses, right? It is fascinating to see people who are so clueless and driven by emotional with so little grounding in hard cold facts.

Stay focused. We are talking about cowards blowing the brains out of defenseless victims.

After you ban guns, will you ban trucks and knives next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China

Lol. Do you ever read the links you post? From one of them.......


"As the Chenpeng school attack was followed by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the United States hours later[2][3] comparisons were drawn between the two. The difference in gun control laws between the two countries was used to explain the disparity in casualties of the school attacks"

I don't read opinions, I am just stating facts. Knife wielding crazy people have killed 8-9 kids in schools in China to the point that all schools now have guards and are fully gated in China, unlike in the US where many schools are open campus.

You posted a link in which it was explained the difference in gun control laws is used to explain why the Chinese attacks were/are so much less severe than us style massacres.

ok, so if this was China instead of the US, 9 kids die from a crazy with a knife instead of a gun.
will you push for knife control now?

Are you dense? The point is that the attacks with assault weapons are much more deadly. In one of the stabbing attacks they discuss....24 children were stabbed and attacked with ZERO fatalities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here is from CO? This Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) says you all use AR-15s against raccoons going after your chickens? Is that for real?!?!? Where I come from (New England) we had shotguns and air rifles for that type of thing.

yes, the AR-15 is illegal to hunt with quite a number of states, including Virginia, because its considered to weak to be a hunting round. The most typical hunting round in the US on game is a .308 which is a bullet that is 2x bigger than used by the AR-15.

AR-15s and the 556/223 ammunition was developed/adapted after WWII because military doctrine shifted from high lethality at range to high volume suppression so that the enemy could be pinned down by volume of fire and be destroyed by other units trough flanking or artillery/bombs.

Thank you for this explanation! My entire family owns firearms but no one has an AR-15.

yes that is quite common, because the AR-15 is seen as primarily a defensive weapon because it's ammo is considered too weak for hunting. If you shoot a deer with it, it will dart away for another 500m before maybe collapsing, not what you want for hunting.

Ok...so there are complaints about this weapon across the board so let's get rid of them. Sounds like everyone can agree that they suck regardless if you think they such because they are too powerful or if you think they suck because they are too weak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Your cosplay boys will crap their pants when the US military gets involved.

2/3 of the military is useless here, aka airforce and navy.
of the army/marines/sof components, roughly 2/3 are logistics while 1/3 are combat arms.
the profile for that group are 18-25 year old male who comes from rural areas.
I'll leave it to you to guess their political leanings.

the airforce can take out whole cities. but some targeted drone hits will probably get the job done.

Major Harper on day 1 of Aerospace Studies to us AS100's. "The Air Force can not occupy the ground. You need boots on the ground for that."

no need to occupy. just take out the threat to national security.

[Anonymous]

People are clueless about the ar-15 body. There are tons of guns that shoot the .223 round and do the exact same thing as an AR. Probably the most common being the ruger mini-14 vermin ranch rifle. It has 30 or 50 round magazines just like an ar platform. The ruger just does not look as cool and most (older versions) have a wood stock.
Talking about one style of gun because it is the gun of choice of psychos is not going to change anything.
Raising the age limit, adding a waiting period for first time buyers and enhanced background checks are a good start.

Kind of like the hand gun limits…although in Virginia you can buy 5 at a time if you have a concealed carry permit, which is kind of odd.

[Anonymous]

Raising the age limit, adding a waiting period for first time buyers and enhanced background checks are a good start.

Sounds good, tell some Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People are clueless about the ar-15 body. There are tons of guns that shoot the .223 round and do the exact same thing as an AR. Probably the most common being the ruger mini-14 vermin ranch rifle. It has 30 or 50 round magazines just like an ar platform. The ruger just does not look as cool and most (older versions) have a wood stock.
Talking about one style of gun because it is the gun of choice of psychos is not going to change anything.
Raising the age limit, adding a waiting period for first time buyers and enhanced background checks are a good start.

Kind of like the hand gun limits…although in Virginia you can buy 5 at a time if you have a concealed carry permit, which is kind of odd.

We will settle for whatever the previous ban covered plus any new offerings of the same ilk since it expired in 2004.

[Anonymous]

Economy is imploding and all they talk about is guns and abortion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People are clueless about the ar-15 body. There are tons of guns that shoot the .223 round and do the exact same thing as an AR. Probably the most common being the ruger mini-14 vermin ranch rifle. It has 30 or 50 round magazines just like an ar platform. The ruger just does not look as cool and most (older versions) have a wood stock.
Talking about one style of gun because it is the gun of choice of psychos is not going to change anything.
Raising the age limit, adding a waiting period for first time buyers and enhanced background checks are a good start.

Kind of like the hand gun limits…although in Virginia you can buy 5 at a time if you have a concealed carry permit, which is kind of odd.

Most likely what one would see is what happens in California but on a national scale. You get an ugly looking rifle that functions the same.

[Anonymous]

Assault weapons ban literally did/does nothing. There are like 500 studies that resulted in inconclusive or not statistically significant on gun crime for the 10 year ban. Only thing they agreed on in a few was Mexico saw a spike in cartel shootings/deaths when the ban was lifted.
Columbine happened during the ban with banned high capacity clips and magazines.

Some basic common sense laws are more important than banning one type of gun.

I mean, aren’t land mines banned in the world? That has worked out great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is a total fetish of the right.

just means the right will take power by force when the time comes. The side that has the most young men with guns win.

Huh. The young men with guns seems to pick on defenseless children and seniors shopping for milk and eggs. Ugly cowards.

just like all liberals love burning and looting small businesses, right? It is fascinating to see people who are so clueless and driven by emotional with so little grounding in hard cold facts.

Stay focused. We are talking about cowards blowing the brains out of defenseless victims.

After you ban guns, will you ban trucks and knives next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China

Lol. Do you ever read the links you post? From one of them.......


"As the Chenpeng school attack was followed by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the United States hours later[2][3] comparisons were drawn between the two. The difference in gun control laws between the two countries was used to explain the disparity in casualties of the school attacks"

I don't read opinions, I am just stating facts. Knife wielding crazy people have killed 8-9 kids in schools in China to the point that all schools now have guards and are fully gated in China, unlike in the US where many schools are open campus.

You posted a link in which it was explained the difference in gun control laws is used to explain why the Chinese attacks were/are so much less severe than us style massacres.

ok, so if this was China instead of the US, 9 kids die from a crazy with a knife instead of a gun.
will you push for knife control now?

Are you dense? The point is that the attacks with assault weapons are much more deadly. In one of the stabbing attacks they discuss....24 children were stabbed and attacked with ZERO fatalities.

assault weapons have nothing do with lethality of a weapon shot at kids at point blank range. You think this would be any different if the shooter had a 9mm pistol instead? A rifle's only benefit is that it can engage targets at longer ranges, which was not the case here. Most mass shooters have historically used handguns, like Cho and Elliot Rodgers.