LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And I just read Jefff's timeline. Seems as if the report went to school officials first who in turn reported it to law enforcement "within minutes" of receiving the report. So clearly the school new.


The school knew. But not necessarily the SB or super. As and LCPS parent I have no trouble believing they were all cluelessly in the dark. Par for the course for them.


It's looking more and more like this is the case. If so, the Admins at Stone Bridge need to be fired. It all just feels like them using technicalities to skirt the rules and not have to make anything public. They also got to use the cover of Mr. Smith simply being an outraged "right winger" "anti-trans" parent at the SB meeting so that no further questions were asked.

I mean, I remember seeing the media coverage of Mr. Smith's arrest and the entire narrative was about CRT and the trans rights bathroom bill. I don't remember seeing any coverage mentioning the scuffle resulted from Mr. Smith speaking about his daughter's SA.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well folks, seems it was a trend:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-loudoun-schools-did-not-record-multiple-alleged-sexual-assaults-over-a-period-of-years-despite-state-law-records-show


Since the headline is kind of chopped off, the Daily Wire is reporting that LCPS has failed to report sexual assaults to the state.

'The Daily Wire asked LCPS questions last week including, “Has Stone Bridge ever reported the May alleged sexual assault in any statistics or made anyone aware of it?” LCPS hid behind state law, with Director of Communications Joan Sahlgren replying that “Any information related to student information is confidential under state and federal laws regarding student privacy.”

However, state law actually requires statistics on assaults and other incidents in schools to be reported to the public, in the form of annually updated statistics available on a public database called Safe Schools Information Resource (SSIR) administered by the Virginia Department of Education. LCPS reported to the state that Stone Bridge had zero sexual assaults for the 2020-2021 school year, which includes May 28, 2021.

[...]

The issue with missing sex assault statistics in Loudoun is not limited to the latest case, raising the prospect that untold numbers of sexual assaults and other infractions have gone unreported.

In October 2018, in a case that was widely reported by the media at the time, three football players at Tuscorara High were arrested and charged with sexual assault. A source told local media that it’s believed a younger player was “held down by teammates who inserted objects into the victim” in a locker room. A spokesperson for LCPS said at the time that “the case will be subject to disciplinary action.” The annual report for Tuscorara that year reported zero instances of sexual offenses against students.'

There's some other interesting info there. Ziegler's going to need to find a few schools to rename in order to keep his job.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



Agreed. This doesn't add up. The school has to explain why there was no communication. Shameful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If my kid is ever sexually assaulted at school, I’m dialing 911. F the school.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.

So what are you doing to change the state law requiring this? Loudoun did not implement their policy out of the goodness of their heart. It is law.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think everyone needs to stop talking about the suspect's gender. It means NOTHING in this case.

From what I know from having kids at Stone Bridge, the suspect wasn't trans. The suspect identifies as nonbinary. The suspect's gender identity is incorrectly being made the focus of the first incident instead of the assault itself. The suspect went into that bathroom to assault the victim at Stone Bridge and held her against her will just like he did at Broad Run.

The gender identity of the suspect nor the rooms matter... the GD act of violence matters!

Also, calls for the school board to resign need to stop as well. That's taking focus off of the facts: the freakin' school board hadn't even been notified on June 22 when Mr. Smith came to the meeting as an upset parent. The SB members took him as a nutcase "anti-trans" parent because no one had notified them that almost a month prior, there had been a rape! The superintendent hadn't even been informed on June 22!

Shut up about the gender identity, shut up about the stupid school board, even shut up about Ziegler... WHO kept the rape allegation from the SB and Superintendent? That is what I want to know. I want that made public ASAP and those people GONE. Unacceptable.


Forcible sodomy generally requires a penis.

Regardless of gender identity.

In that respect, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't matter what is the accused's gender identity


Not always, from a legal standpoint. It can include digits (fingers) and objects.


The Virginia statue does not.

A. An accused shall be guilty of forcible sodomy if he or she engages in cunnilingus, fellatio, anilingus, or anal intercourse with a complaining witness whether or not his or her spouse, or causes a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, to engage in such acts with any other person, and

1. The complaining witness is less than 13 years of age; or

2. The act is accomplished against the will of the complaining witness, by force, threat or intimidation of or against the complaining witness or another person, or through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness.


I’m pretty sure I read elsewhere it was forced fellatio.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.

So what are you doing to change the state law requiring this? Loudoun did not implement their policy out of the goodness of their heart. It is law.


So you agree with the position? What are you doing?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.

So what are you doing to change the state law requiring this? Loudoun did not implement their policy out of the goodness of their heart. It is law.


So you agree with the position? What are you doing?


DP here. I definitely don’t agree, but LCPS can’t change it even if they want to. It’s state law as of 7/1/2021.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.

So what are you doing to change the state law requiring this? Loudoun did not implement their policy out of the goodness of their heart. It is law.


So you agree with the position? What are you doing?


DP here. I definitely don’t agree, but LCPS can’t change it even if they want to. It’s state law as of 7/1/2021.


Well then the democrats shouldn’t be surprised that the race with Youngkin is tight. This is where we are.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
DP here. I definitely don’t agree, but LCPS can’t change it even if they want to. It’s state law as of 7/1/2021.


Well then the democrats shouldn’t be surprised that the race with Youngkin is tight. This is where we are.


Folks, this is not a Democrat vs Republican issue. The issue of transgender students' rights to use bathrooms that match their gender identity went all the way to the Supreme Court and the Court let stand a decision in favor of the students.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/28/supreme-court-transgender-rights-496710

The case had its origin in Virginia.

I will again point out that the suspect in these two assault cases is not transgender. We really should get off the transgender discussion because it is taking away from the reality of two girls being assaulted (one of which had nothing to do with bathrooms).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Typically, a trans guy would not rape a girl. This disturbing boy is obviously not really trans. It is so unfortunate that the ultra right wings are trying to use this terrible incident against the LGBT community. Any boy, even wearing pants, can easily walk into a high school girl’s bathroom without anyone in the hallways doing anything about it. The hallways are either chaotic or empty and everyone is too busy getting to their classes on time.


I agree the trans part is irrelevant. I just can’t believe they just simply enrolled him in another school nearby!!!


Of course it’s relevant, girls are now expected to be comfortable with boys in bathrooms and locker rooms with them and are shamed if they speak about their discomfort.


This student/assailant is a sexual predator. The same exact thing could have happened 5 years ago.


Yes… feminists don’t want to make it easier for sexual predators to access safe spaces… there is no way for the average person to know who is a sexual predator pretending to be trans versus who is “legitimately” trans… therefore keeping sex-segregated spaces safe for women is one guard against predators.

Glad we agree.


The second assault happened in an empty classroom. How are you going to keep trans kids out of there?


Exactly. And this kid isn't even trans! He's nonbinary. He sometimes wears clothes to present as more masculine and sometimes wears clothes to present as more feminine.

I think people need to educate themselves more. Nonbinary does not equal trans. Wearing a skirt does not equal trans for a guy anymore than a girl wearing pants would make her trans.

Making this all about the trans bathroom bill is distracting from the important fact that two young women were SA at school and no one was told anything for months.



The problem is the current policies allow male-bodied students to use the same bathroom as female-bodied students. As I said upthread, this removes a layer of protection for the girls. A teacher can’t stop a male-bodied student from using the girls bathroom. A peer can’t call out a male-bodied student for using the girls bathroom. Girls are expected to share their bathrooms with male-bodied students and see it as normal. This makes them vulnerable to this type of assault.

There is a compromise option of allowing students who have a gender identity that differs from their sex at birth to use a private bathroom. That solution has been shot down repeatedly, because of concerns for the transgender student’s feelings. I think it’s time that we prioritize the feelings of girls who feel vulnerable in school bathrooms because of incidents such as this. Private bathrooms for students not comfortable using the restroom that matches their birth sex is a reasonable middle ground.


I understand that you think that a simple policy will make girls safer. But you aren't asking yourself. Has the rate of sexual assault risen since schools instituted these policies? Before this policy were boys regularly in the girls restroom (I would say my MIL is a principal and routinely catches kids having sex in the bathroom)? How do the actual kids feel? Do girls or boys feel more vulnerable with the new policy? Did kids consider the bathroom a safe space before this? If they fell unsafe, Is there a less restrictive method that could support everyone? For example, removing the main doors like they did in Yorktown?

I really don't think the location of the assault matters that much to be honest. The kid went on to assault someone in a classroom. There was an article about a school in Chantilly where someone assault girls in a busy HS hallway. The location isn't the issue.

Anonymous
Here is what I see. I see a school board that has become so disconnected from parents that it cannot function. And that kind of expands beyond the board to admins and to the Super. Right now the reflexive response from the Board is that parents are wrong unless the parents agree with the board (on anything/everything). As with politics today, one side is shut off by use of various disparaging names. But if I am fighting it out with a political opponent over a glass of wine and we call each other names (in jest or in anger) it doesn't matter because we are equals. Here the board and the school system has power over what and who and how everything is done. And anyone criticizing anything they do is vilified.

So Jeff, you are right. This doesn't have to be political. But Smith was arrested because it was assumed that he was going to rail against CRT. He is white, blue collar--fits the narrative of what a CRT basher looks like. And the board was primed and ready to put one of those CRT bashers in cuffs. To flex their muscle and show that they are in control.

But that is the crux of the matter. They should not be forcing their positions on people. They were elected and should strive to represent those who elected them. It is their job to listen and to think. They have to decide on things but people feel much better about decisions when they know they have been heard. But the board isn't listening. Not even to a dad whose daughter was assaulted on school property. They should step down because they have fostered such an antagonist tone (I get it that they have been yelled at but they are not innocent either) that they cannot do their jobs anymore.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If my kid is ever sexually assaulted at school, I’m dialing 911. F the school.


+1


I told my daughter to call 911 if, God forbid, something like this happens at school. Because I have lost any faith I had that something like this would be handled appropriately by the admin.
Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Go to: