Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

So they couldn't come up with real charges like bribery, extortion, robbery etc..m so they came up with 2 subjective fake charges, kangaroo court indeed hagaha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: no one cares and has moved on except the Democrat congress.

On the contrary, at least 50% of The People care, with some variance depending on where you are.

[Anonymous]

Also they couldn't use obstruction of Justice because congress is the kangaroo court lololollkl

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: no one cares and has moved on except the Democrat congress.

Nice how you dismiss the majority of Americans who voted for those Democrats to represent them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So they couldn't come up with real charges like bribery, extortion, robbery etc..m so they came up with 2 subjective fake charges, kangaroo court indeed hagaha

The articles of impeachment against Nixon were obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress.

Would you have wanted Nixon to resign in the face of that, in today's climate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:no one cares and has moved on except the Democrat congress.

In fact, support for impeachment has eclipsed "don't support", starting from Oct 1 in averages of national polls. What you should be worried about is that increase has been predominantly from an increase in Independents supporting impeachment.

[Anonymous]

Here they are: Only 9 pages.

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/Articles%20of%20Impeachment.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

Let’s be realistic. The timing was because of the devastating report out last night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

Let’s be realistic. The timing was because of the devastating report out last night.

Pelosi said by Thanksgiving, which they missed.

The report was supposed to come out in August, so I guess you're right...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

Let’s be realistic. The timing was because of the devastating report out last night.

I don't see what that has to do with my post, but okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

Let’s be realistic. The timing was because of the devastating report out last night.

The report that said the FBI investigation was properly started and there was no spying on the Trump campaign? Ya, devastating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: no one cares and has moved on except the Democrat congress.

Nice how you dismiss the majority of Americans who voted for those Democrats to represent them.

It's partisan, the only people who are partial are independents and swing who are now majority against impeachment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite the contrary. Most all "facts" have been disputed.

You are correct. Almost every fact introduced has been disputed.

Of course, the basis of those disputes are utter garbage, comprising as they do a mix of conspiracy theories, whatabouts, diversions, hysterical ranting, and outright lies - but yes, they have technically been disputed.

Let’s be realistic. The timing was because of the devastating report out last night.

Devastating...for Democrats/thinking people? You're out of your mind. Maybe read that report and not the Bill Barr cocktail napkin version.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: no one cares and has moved on except the Democrat congress.

Nice how you dismiss the majority of Americans who voted for those Democrats to represent them.

It's partisan, the only people who are partial are independents and swing who are now majority against impeachment.

They were still elected by the majority of Americans. Nice of you dismiss them and nullify their votes.