New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a post in instagram and x about Skyline and CISC joining new competition tier for MLSNext.

Does anyone know if they mean MLSN2 or this vague new NAL league that is MLSN3?

please post X link

Don't know about Skyline, but CISC is going to have 1 MLS Next team, 1 MLS new tier team and (I think) 1 Regional North team that's in NAL and 1 Regional South team that's in either NAL or NPL per age group.

[Anonymous]

Here's a boom, GA is no different than the old bankrupt DA. Only a matter of time before they go bankrupt too. Bankruptcy Boom!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Probably not going bankrupt this time since it’s all pay for play. DA was funded by us soccer and sponsors. Pandemic happened and realities of a failed experiment were obviously apparent to all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Probably not going bankrupt this time since it’s all pay for play. DA was funded by us soccer and sponsors. Pandemic happened and realities of a failed experiment were obviously apparent to all.

thus the reason to add a second division. $$$$$$$

wonder if GA will have anymore showcases than the 3 currently?

[Anonymous]

GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

Your posts are so blatantly one sided (and dumb) for ECNL that people ignore you.

GA is growing and clubs are switching over. Call it watering down if you want it doesn't matter. The partnership with MLSN was a genius move + stopped girls ECNL in its tracks. Soon MLSN clubs with girls ECNL are going to be forced to play in GA. I'm sure discussions for this are already in play. Implementation will occur next season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

I agree GA has added some poor teams in last 2 years and it may not help their overall reputation, GA needs to improve in that area. It looks like there are some new teams in aspire that are greater overall than some GA teams. My guess is GA will begin a warning and demotion/ promotion process in the near future and aspire is the platform to fulfill that vision. Bigger picture, these low level teams will be in brackets that are far away from the top brackets during showcases so if your kid is on on tier 1 or tier 2 ga team, it really has no impact. If that bad team happens to be in your conference during hs years, you play 1 bad game a year. Get over it and move on

[Anonymous]

ECNL added over 100 clubs to ECRL…… then promoted some unknown clubs..

Face it .. the best clubs have already been picked up and that’s who college coaches want to see.

ECNL has some very very bad clubs as well. Stop with the nonsemse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

adding teams to a second division is not a big deal as you are trying to build a market. let them fight it out and if they prove it, promote them. I understand that for both Aspire and RL. makes sense. but GA Mickey Mouse ears are trying to get all hyped up about very bad teams added to GA. ECNL overall is not adding a bunch of bad teams and have started cutting bait with bad teams that were already in. if your team is ranked over 300, there is no reason for them to be in either GA or ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

This comment doesn’t even make sense. Aren’t there roughly the same amount of clubs between the two leagues? Watered down? ECNL has a lot of terrible clubs and so does GA. The only people bashing on the GA expansion are the ECNL hats whose DD are the 15th best player on a low level ECNL team who cheer for the league and not their club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

In our market, most top USYS clubs are going ECNL/RL OR MLSN/GA. The true watering down sadly are clubs that remain in USYS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

In our market, most top USYS clubs are going ECNL/RL OR MLSN/GA. The true watering down sadly are clubs that remain in USYS.

Then again, new opportunities for those clubs/kids, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA Visors have gone quiet.

YOU get a BADGE and YOU get a BADGE

Come on man, haven't you seen all the ECRL clubs they've added. That's a pretty big blind spot you have. Both are growing and going after the USYS' lunch.

None of which this year are in our region. My glasses are just fine. GA is trying to flood the market and in doing so they are watering down. Want better for your girl.

In our market, most top USYS clubs are going ECNL/RL OR MLSN/GA. The true watering down sadly are clubs that remain in USYS.

How does USYS get "watered down" if clubs leave for other leagues? Your comment makes no sense.

The level of competition might be decreasing or increasing depending on which clubs leave but it's not being watered down.

General FYI watered down is a term girls ECNL parents use when more options to play become available and clubs aren't able to be the only high level option for players in town. This forces clubs to develop their own players because they can no longer poach talent from all the clubs around them.