Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Even putting aside his reprehensible sexual assaults, Kavanaugh revealed himself to be a highly partisan political hack with a non-judicial temperament. That alone would cause most reasonable people to be a no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to figure out who is pulling Graham's puppet strings.

Didn't someone say he is being blackmailed because he is homosexual?

Probably threatened by Tantrum. Graham changed after a golf outing with Tantrum.

Whatever it is, someone on here knows. These kinds of things are an open secret in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Liberal Smear Campaign is a FAT failure.

Just you wait til November. Women will not forget.

Women have sons, brothers, and fathers, too. No woman wants her male family member destroyed over stuff like this.

Most men whose lives are “destroyed over stuff like this” are destroyed because they did it. I’m raising my boys to men who don’t rape. I certainly didn’t marry a rapist.

Um...do you feel the same when a woman's life is destroyed by accusations of being sexually promiscuous, etc?

You think promiscuity is the same thing as rape?

[Anonymous]

He came across as so smarmy to me, in the previous hearings and definitely today. He is just like all the privileged and entitled boys I went to high school with in the 1980's (not in the this area, but a prep school). And if anyone bought his made-up BS about the definitions in the yearbook and the reasons behind some of the "talk" then I have a bridge to sell you.

Trust me, the boys of this crowd will do anything to get what they believe is their's for the taking, including lying under oath. And they will rally around each other no matter what. He testified to the fact that he has been talking with his classmates from Georgetown Prep during this time. I'm more than confident that they came up with the lame excuses for him and made a vow to lie for him. Since there are valid questions about him lying previously under oath, why would anything think he isn't lying now?

[Anonymous]

Hatefulness is a bad road to take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
"Where Christine Blasey Ford was calm and dignified, Brett Kavanaugh was volatile and belligerent; where she was eager to respond fully to every questioner, and kept worrying whether she was being “helpful” enough, he was openly contemptuous of several senators; most important, where she was credible and unshakable at every point in her testimony, he was at some points evasive, and some of his answers strained credulity."

- NYT Editorial. Biased source you might say, but in this instance, I completely agree with them.

One thousand percent.

He came in basically saying, "I deserve this appointment and waa waa you're trying to take it away from me." Petulant and entitled.

My sense, too. He really has an arrogant, entitled air about him. “I got into YLS!”

He has been wrongly accused of horrible acts. He is not going to be calm and dignified. He’s mad as hell at this crap. And, yes, I would be very contemptuous of the Senators who managed to turn this hearing into a fiasco. I do not blame him one little bit.
And, the NY Times? Full of crap.

I’m sorry but I don’t think he is innocent. I find his assertion comical.

So you’re willing to ruin a man’s career and reputation over an allegation? An allegation that is uncorroborated and mostly refuted?

I think there is evidence. Medical notes. Judge’s book.

There is no evidence. It’s not a trial. It’s politics. I doubt anyone’s mind was changed today. Everyone just brings their own baggage and projects what they want to believe.

This will just get the republican base out. The Dems were already go8ng to vote.

Lots of people’s minds were changed today. Ford looked credible, sane. Kavanaugh looked volatile, sounded crazy (blaming the Clintons? The heck?)

It's the other way around, cupcake. She came off as a mental case. One who, BTW, looks a lot older than she claims to be.

[Anonymous]

Dr. Ford is credible. Why on earth would she lie? She has had to move twice since the letter went public. Women rarely lie about these things.... but you have had 200+ pages of this argument. You went in gunning for Kavanaugh and was never going to believe Ford unless there was video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even putting aside his reprehensible sexual assaults, Kavanaugh revealed himself to be a highly partisan political hack with a non-judicial temperament. That alone would cause most reasonable people to be a no.

Exactly!

He was unhinged today. Like a petulant brat.

This, plus his yearbook should be enough to pass on him.

(It's Rehoboth, asshat.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Liberal Smear Campaign is a FAT failure.

Just you wait til November. Women will not forget.

Women have sons, brothers, and fathers, too. No woman wants her male family member destroyed over stuff like this.

Most men whose lives are “destroyed over stuff like this” are destroyed because they did it. I’m raising my boys to men who don’t rape. I certainly didn’t marry a rapist.

So you think

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe they do have the votes. Manchin is voting yes so they have a dem.

But this is not over. It’s not 1991 anymore.

Source? I heard the opposite.

Trolls post lies. Where is the link? Manchin is a no.

Don’t call me a troll. I’m crying my eyes out over this. This has been one of the worst days in the history of our country and I’m sick over this. Some in the press are reporting he could be a yes. I cited Elaine plott from the Atlantic as my source from my Twitter feed. I hope to god she is wrong. It is all speculation at this point but I’m hoping for the best and expecting the worst. This thread is awful and unhelpful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to figure out who is pulling Graham's puppet strings.

Didn't someone say he is being blackmailed because he is homosexual?

Clearly neither of you learned anything from today. Sad.

[Anonymous]

The worst was when he didn't actually answer about being black out drunk and instead rudely asked the 2 senators whether they drink and like beer. It was the words and behavior of a shitty teenage boy, not a man trying to become a Supreme Court justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
"Where Christine Blasey Ford was calm and dignified, Brett Kavanaugh was volatile and belligerent; where she was eager to respond fully to every questioner, and kept worrying whether she was being “helpful” enough, he was openly contemptuous of several senators; most important, where she was credible and unshakable at every point in her testimony, he was at some points evasive, and some of his answers strained credulity."

- NYT Editorial. Biased source you might say, but in this instance, I completely agree with them.

One thousand percent.

He came in basically saying, "I deserve this appointment and waa waa you're trying to take it away from me." Petulant and entitled.

My sense, too. He really has an arrogant, entitled air about him. “I got into YLS!”

He has been wrongly accused of horrible acts. He is not going to be calm and dignified. He’s mad as hell at this crap. And, yes, I would be very contemptuous of the Senators who managed to turn this hearing into a fiasco. I do not blame him one little bit.
And, the NY Times? Full of crap.

I’m sorry but I don’t think he is innocent. I find his assertion comical.

So you’re willing to ruin a man’s career and reputation over an allegation? An allegation that is uncorroborated and mostly refuted?

I think there is evidence. Medical notes. Judge’s book.

There is no evidence. It’s not a trial. It’s politics. I doubt anyone’s mind was changed today. Everyone just brings their own baggage and projects what they want to believe.

This will just get the republican base out. The Dems were already go8ng to vote.

I don't always vote Republican by any stretch, but I was totally disgusted today by Feinstein and Durbin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An election betting site is showing that nearly 80% of those who are putting money on the confirmation outcome on the site now believe Kavanaugh will be confirmed. This is up over 30% in the last four hours.

I'm with the 80%. Republicans have proved over and over that power is more important than anything else and worth any cost.

I'd say that Feinstein belongs in your description, too, and she's a Democrat.

Do. Feinstein was a great senator at one point, but at this point I think she's in it as deeply as McConnell and Grassley and needs to go. At least she hasn't hitched herself to the worst of human nature like the Republicans, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He came across as so smarmy to me, in the previous hearings and definitely today. He is just like all the privileged and entitled boys I went to high school with in the 1980's (not in the this area, but a prep school). And if anyone bought his made-up BS about the definitions in the yearbook and the reasons behind some of the "talk" then I have a bridge to sell you.

Trust me, the boys of this crowd will do anything to get what they believe is their's for the taking, including lying under oath. And they will rally around each other no matter what. He testified to the fact that he has been talking with his classmates from Georgetown Prep during this time. I'm more than confident that they came up with the lame excuses for him and made a vow to lie for him. Since there are valid questions about him lying previously under oath, why would anything think he isn't lying now?

OF COURSE. The world is theirs for the taking. It is so obvious and they laugh at everyone who is dumb enough to believe them.