Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today's hearing will not cut it as far as impeachment and removal of Trump.

Let's go back to the 25th Amendment.

He will be impeached. He won't be convicted.

The proceedings may sway some voters. But not enough to make the Senate budge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today's hearing will not cut it as far as impeachment and removal of Trump.

Let's go back to the 25th Amendment.

Today's hearing?

Are you a Millennial? No attention span/want it now!

[Anonymous]

You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

Trump is working to increase corruption in Ukraine. And he's hurting Ukraine (Donbas).

Prior administrations worked to decrease corruption in Ukraine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

Yeah, I’m sure Ukraine just loves all the extortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

Liar.

"Between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine. Under Obama, the federal government started the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which sent other kinds of U.S. military equipment to the country. From 2016 to 2019, Congress appropriated $850 million. In the last year of the Obama administration, Congress authorized lethal aid, but it didn’t include the Javelins."
https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2019/oct/25/matt-gaetz/matt-gaetz-says-obama-permanently-stopped-military/

[Anonymous]

Trump’s campaign chairman was one of the worst offenders. He made millions sucking Ukraine dry. If Trump was so concerned about corruption in Ukraine, why hire Manafort?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

Liar.

"Between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine. Under Obama, the federal government started the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which sent other kinds of U.S. military equipment to the country. From 2016 to 2019, Congress appropriated $850 million. In the last year of the Obama administration, Congress authorized lethal aid, but it didn’t include the Javelins."
https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2019/oct/25/matt-gaetz/matt-gaetz-says-obama-permanently-stopped-military/

People died! Don't forget that - When aid was held up by Trump, Ukrainians DIED fighting Russian incursion. It's that simple. Trump not only held up this aid for HIS personal gain, people died and he put our national security at risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all need to decide, when you vote in 2020, whether or not you want future Presidents to be free to use the power of the office and public funds to coerce foreign governments to take actions that would personally and politically benefit said future-President.

If that if the future you want, then by all means continue to support Trump.

Trump is helping Ukraine.
Dems did not.

You’re an idiot. If this is your level of comprehension, then you’re not worth enlightening.

[Anonymous]

So he could find *potential* dirt on a *potential* opponent, and win another election so Trump can keep on lining his pockets at the expense of American taxpayers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today's hearing will not cut it as far as impeachment and removal of Trump.

Let's go back to the 25th Amendment.

Today's hearing?

Are you a Millennial? No attention span/want it now!

You’re responding to a Republican troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Summary: “I heard it from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, heard it from another you were messing around.”

REO Speedwagon

The point of the song is that she *is* messing around, and he just doesn't want to believe it. Because believing it would threaten the cozy illusion he has set up for himself and reveal that his trust is misplaced, and that he has been had by a con artist.

[Anonymous]

For the George Kent fans, the Post has a profile on him today. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/george-kent-top-state-department-ukraine-expert-helps-democrats-debunk-gop-theories/2019/11/13/38ec224e-0588-11ea-8292-c46ee8cb3dce_story.html#click=https://t.co/CKIjaBz2kf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Summary: “I heard it from a friend who, heard it from a friend who, heard it from another you were messing around.”

REO Speedwagon

The point of the song is that she *is* messing around, and he just doesn't want to believe it. Because believing it would threaten the cozy illusion he has set up for himself and reveal that his trust is misplaced, and that he has been had by a con artist.

For the love of all that is holy, do not invoke REO Speedwagon in defense of that lying criminal.