What going on with Cracker Barrel ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

Their corporate behavior going back a few years is the woke part. Sponsoring all age pride events, DEI, trainings in corporate(which the other thread says is the actual meaning of woke).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

Their corporate behavior going back a few years is the woke part. Sponsoring all age pride events, DEI, trainings in corporate(which the other thread says is the actual meaning of woke).

*eyeroll*

Why would I or anyone else give a crap if they did? It didn't hurt anyone other than the usual whiny-conservatives-aggrieved-at-everything consortium and even they weren't hurt by any of it.

[Anonymous]

Get woke, go broke.

Cracker Barrel found that out the hard way.

[Anonymous]

The party that denied Elon Musk giving a literal Nazi salute wants to make that random connection of connecting a dumb bland logo to Democrats.

Okay then you don't get to complain about being connected to Nazis. Deal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Get woke, go broke.

Cracker Barrel found that out the hard way.

Boring logos are "woke?"

That's right up there with the stupidest f'ing things I've ever heard on this message board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

Well, he is President, and this is a political forum on a message board, visited by hundreds, possibly thousands of people. Soo frankly it would be weird if people didn't post about him.

And, given the number of people coming to this site from all around the country (along with a fair number of foreign posters I'm pretty sure no one individual is on here posting 24x7 about Trump but there would certainly be plenty of people on both the east and west coasts covering a wide span of time.

Now, beyond merely posting about him, the constant griping would be an obvious symptom of just how many people are fed up with him, given he does have the lowest approval ratings of any President of our lifetimes, so based on approval polls alone would leave one to expect that a majority of Americans do not like him.

Frankly it would be pretty weird if people didn't talk about Trump here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

Oh, so complaining about Trump posts is just an empty flailing deflection from the fact that the Dems had nothing to do with the logo change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

Oh, so complaining about Trump posts is just an empty flailing deflection from the fact that the Dems had nothing to do with the logo change.

I'll bet that their CEO is not MAGA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

Oh, so complaining about Trump posts is just an empty flailing deflection from the fact that the Dems had nothing to do with the logo change.

I'll bet that their CEO is not MAGA!

Yep, because MAGA CEOs flame out even harder than the “woke” ones you love to whine about.

Just look at the wreckage:
Mike Lindell? Pillow-peddling punchline.
Elon Musk? From tech titan to Twitter tantrums and Tesla tanking.

And the rest of the MAGA CEO club? Mostly bankrupt, indicted, or desperately trying to sell supplements on podcasts.

Y’all love “Go woke, go broke,” but your side’s got its own greatest hits:

Go MAGA, go mayhem

Go MAGA, go meltdown

Go MAGA, go mugshot

Go MAGA, go MIA — usually right after the lawsuits hit.

It’s adorable how the self-proclaimed “party of business” keeps mistaking conspiracy cranks and crypto bros for captains of industry. If this is your idea of business acumen, no wonder you're clinging to Cracker Barrel logos like it's the last bastion of Western civilization.

[Anonymous]

The Journal did a podcast Cracker Barrel. It’s available on Spotify. The whole thing was egged on by an activist investor. Once again, MAGA are puppets of the rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woke woman made a bad decision resulting in anger and backlash from a company’s customer base. Bud Light redux. It’s pretty simple really.

Fans of Bud Lite's redux are here on DCUM defending the bland, generic Cracker Barrel changes.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

What you repeatedly fail to understand is that nobody here is defending their bland, ugly logo change. Instead, we are calling you stupid and disingenuous for trying to blame the logo change on "woke" or "liberals" when you've repeatedly failed to prove that point. We are calling you out for your deranged obsession with turning everything into a "us vs the libs" culture war beachhead even when it's not.

How many more times do you need to be told this, or are you just permanently stuck on stupid?

That post did not blame any changes on liberals or use the term woke; and the post mentioned changes-- that would include far more than the logo; however, many posters on this thread did defend the logo and said they liked it.

"Many?" I didn't see that, I saw a lot of the thread but didn't read every page, so it certainly was NOT a dominant theme in this thread. And certainly not "sunup to sundown" as claimed previously. Maybe one poster said they liked it. But that still doesn't make it political or "libs want this."

Sunup to sundown refers to all the whining about Trump in the Political forum. It's almost nonstop. I don't like him either and didn't vote for him, but I'm not letting him be in my mind 24/7.

Oh, so complaining about Trump posts is just an empty flailing deflection from the fact that the Dems had nothing to do with the logo change.

I'll bet that their CEO is not MAGA!

Yep, because MAGA CEOs flame out even harder than the “woke” ones you love to whine about.

Just look at the wreckage:
Mike Lindell? Pillow-peddling punchline.
Elon Musk? From tech titan to Twitter tantrums and Tesla tanking.

And the rest of the MAGA CEO club? Mostly bankrupt, indicted, or desperately trying to sell supplements on podcasts.

Y’all love “Go woke, go broke,” but your side’s got its own greatest hits:

Go MAGA, go mayhem

Go MAGA, go meltdown

Go MAGA, go mugshot

Go MAGA, go MIA — usually right after the lawsuits hit.

It’s adorable how the self-proclaimed “party of business” keeps mistaking conspiracy cranks and crypto bros for captains of industry. If this is your idea of business acumen, no wonder you're clinging to Cracker Barrel logos like it's the last bastion of Western civilization.

YAWN