The FBI has *ARRESTED* a sitting judge in Milwaukee, over allegations it obstructed immigration enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The facts in the administrative warrant admit that the subject could have been apprehended multiple times in places around and in the courthouse but not the courtroom. The judge did nothing wrong as iCE had omen of bites at the apple. The tell here is they cuffed her with her arms behind her back for the photo op.

Imagine thinking it’s ok to have the lawyer for a woman battered by this illegal alien left waiting (still ready to testify!) because the judge couldn’t be bothered to let him know she had secreted the criminal out the back door to let him escape.

This is going to be dropped and she’s going to make fools of the gestapo, yet again.

The main point here is about how ICE was attempting to arrest him—not the existence of a prior deportation order. An administrative warrant, like the one ICE had, isn’t signed by a judge and doesn’t carry the same legal weight, especially within a courthouse.

Judges have the authority to challenge ICE arrests in their courtrooms when proper judicial procedures aren’t followed. That’s exactly what Dugan did. Now, she’s being charged simply for defending the basic integrity of the courtroom.

You're just making crap up. The fact that ICE had an administrative warrant is immaterial here.

The type of warrant is irrelevant. The ONLY question is whether she violated the law. She cannot use the type of warrant as an excuse.

The entire point is that the type of warrant thay had is relevant to/determinative of whether she violated the law.

If you read the govt’s own complaint they rode in the elevator down with him so this whole charade about a foot race outside the courthouse is just manufactured nonsense.

It is almost as if they thought confronting a violent criminal in an enclosed space like an elevator was a bad idea. Possibly with other innocent people in the same elevator.

You people are idiots.

The point is she directed the guy from her courtroom to a public hallway (a perfectly legal and appropriate thing to do), two guys watched him in the hall, rode down the elevator with him and then suddenly he’s outside and they are chasing him?

Tell me again who the idiots are?.

If they made the arrest inside the courthouse posters here would have had a hissy fit. When they decide to make the arrest outside the courthouse they’re called idiots.

Nope, the issues was her courtroom, full stop. Please cease with moving the goalposts.

So that’s why she snuck the domestic battering illegal immigrant out through the juror exit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The facts in the administrative warrant admit that the subject could have been apprehended multiple times in places around and in the courthouse but not the courtroom. The judge did nothing wrong as iCE had omen of bites at the apple. The tell here is they cuffed her with her arms behind her back for the photo op.

Imagine thinking it’s ok to have the lawyer for a woman battered by this illegal alien left waiting (still ready to testify!) because the judge couldn’t be bothered to let him know she had secreted the criminal out the back door to let him escape.

This is going to be dropped and she’s going to make fools of the gestapo, yet again.

The main point here is about how ICE was attempting to arrest him—not the existence of a prior deportation order. An administrative warrant, like the one ICE had, isn’t signed by a judge and doesn’t carry the same legal weight, especially within a courthouse.

Judges have the authority to challenge ICE arrests in their courtrooms when proper judicial procedures aren’t followed. That’s exactly what Dugan did. Now, she’s being charged simply for defending the basic integrity of the courtroom.

You're just making crap up. The fact that ICE had an administrative warrant is immaterial here.

The type of warrant is irrelevant. The ONLY question is whether she violated the law. She cannot use the type of warrant as an excuse.

The entire point is that the type of warrant thay had is relevant to/determinative of whether she violated the law.

If you read the govt’s own complaint they rode in the elevator down with him so this whole charade about a foot race outside the courthouse is just manufactured nonsense.

It is almost as if they thought confronting a violent criminal in an enclosed space like an elevator was a bad idea. Possibly with other innocent people in the same elevator.

You people are idiots.

The point is she directed the guy from her courtroom to a public hallway (a perfectly legal and appropriate thing to do), two guys watched him in the hall, rode down the elevator with him and then suddenly he’s outside and they are chasing him?

Tell me again who the idiots are?.

If they made the arrest inside the courthouse posters here would have had a hissy fit. When they decide to make the arrest outside the courthouse they’re called idiots.

Nope, the issues was her courtroom, full stop. Please cease with moving the goalposts.

So that’s why she snuck the domestic battering illegal immigrant out through the juror exit?

To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him, saw him and were with him in the elevator. Why didn't they arrest him then when he was outside of her courtroom? Instead, they fabricated this whole episode for the photo op and headlines. Why are you falling for it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

lol, ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

Nope, your love for Trump has colored yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

Nope, your love for Trump has colored yours.

There are witnesses to this incident. The judge attempted to thwart an arrest. That’s illegal. You can rationalize all you want but she’s in trouble.

[Anonymous]

She FAFO. Blew up her career and for who? A violent illegal immigrant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

Nope, your love for Trump has colored yours.

There are witnesses to this incident. The judge attempted to thwart an arrest. That’s illegal. You can rationalize all you want but she’s in trouble.

Please cite the law she violated. 🙄

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

Nope, your love for Trump has colored yours.

There are witnesses to this incident. The judge attempted to thwart an arrest. That’s illegal. You can rationalize all you want but she’s in trouble.

Please cite the law she violated. 🙄

18 U.S. Code § 1505

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the same hallway where the ICE agents were waiting for him

Did the judge know they were there? She didn’t tell the agents she confronted to go wait by the juror door. She thought she was sneaking a domestic batterer that is illegally present in the U.S. out a side door to evade arrest. That’s why she’ll be indicted.

A judge picking which door to use to ask someone to leave her courtroom is not illegal no matter how much your fevered fascist dreams want to prosecute the judiciary.

The point is this whole thing was manufactured— right down to arresting the judge instead of just asking her to appear.

And the point of manufacturing it is to suggest that the judiciary is illegitimate because Trump/Miller know that whenever they actually has to defend their actions in court they will be found to be illegal and unconstitutional and they want to lay the groundwork for conflict with the courts.

No One is Above the Law indeed.

So she just so happened to pick the nonpublic door to send him through after sending the law enforcement on a wild goose chase to the chief judge's office to look at the warrant that was irrelevant in a public space (the courthouse).

You have totally lost this one but keep digging.

They actually haven’t lost. It’s the basis for her arrest. Your hate for Trump has you confused about the actual law.

Nope, your love for Trump has colored yours.

There are witnesses to this incident. The judge attempted to thwart an arrest. That’s illegal. You can rationalize all you want but she’s in trouble.

Please cite the law she violated. 🙄

It’s been cited a few times here. Obstructing and impeding a proceeding before a department or agency of the US and concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest. Those are federal crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She FAFO. Blew up her career and for who? A violent illegal immigrant.

Even CNN has conceded this, but is now whining about the fact that she was arrested publicly. The arrest was intended to send a message to other activist judges who are considering the same or similar behavior.