BRF Fashion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

And third cousins!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

That’s a hazard when you guys try to start yet another thread to fawn over Kate but there are no recent pictures of Kate.

Apparently Kate is showing up at Wimbledon tomorrow (really bad optics imo, but nobody asked me), so there will be more Kate fodder for this thread.

Bad optics because she doesn't show up for "work" type events (charities, etc) but she shows up for fun stuff?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

No everyone hangs around their family. And going to official events isn't the definition of family. We can go back and forth all day on this if you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

That’s a hazard when you guys try to start yet another thread to fawn over Kate but there are no recent pictures of Kate.

Apparently Kate is showing up at Wimbledon tomorrow (really bad optics imo, but nobody asked me), so there will be more Kate fodder for this thread.

Bad optics because she doesn't show up for "work" type events (charities, etc) but she shows up for fun stuff?

It's a "work" event for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

No everyone hangs around their family. And going to official events isn't the definition of family. We can go back and forth all day on this if you want.

We can but you'd still be wrong. They are living the LA life and dream, not a royal or British one by any stretch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

No everyone hangs around their family. And going to official events isn't the definition of family. We can go back and forth all day on this if you want.

We can but you'd still be wrong. They are living the LA life and dream, not a royal or British one by any stretch.

While being related to and therefore being in the royal family. If you want to start a thread of fashions of "working members of the royal family" do so but the third cousins and Spencer's and 'em wouldn't be allowed to be included, nor the Middletons.

[Anonymous]

Charming in various shades of blue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Princess Anne's daughter Zara Tindall was also there with her husband Mike:

Wearing the same dress Queen Mary wore a few days ago.


ME+EM is very popular for the Royal (and royal-adjacent) ladies.

Here is Carole Middleton at Wimbledon in a blazer from that brand as well:

I mean this as an absolute compliment: how do you know these things? Are you in fashion?

I'm just a fashion lover and follow a lot of fashion blogs!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

No everyone hangs around their family. And going to official events isn't the definition of family. We can go back and forth all day on this if you want.

We can but you'd still be wrong. They are living the LA life and dream, not a royal or British one by any stretch.

While being related to and therefore being in the royal family. If you want to start a thread of fashions of "working members of the royal family" do so but the third cousins and Spencer's and 'em wouldn't be allowed to be included, nor the Middletons.

Working members of the royal family, for your reference:

Who are the working royals?
There are currently 11 working members of the royal family: King Charles III and Queen Camilla, the Prince and Princess of Wales, Princess Anne, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, the Duke of Kent and Princess Alexandra.

Though given how few appearances and a lack of strong name recognition, many experts don't consider the Gloucesters or Princess Alexandra part of the core unit of senior working royals. With the King and Kate unavailable, that leaves just five people to take on the bulk of public engagements.

What do senior working royals do?
Working royals are people who support the King in his role as head of state, Clare McHugh, royal historian and author of The Romanov Brides tells TIME. “The monarchy is no longer just a rich family that does what they want," she says. "In the last century, gradually, the wealth and the family has been streamlined, in order to emphasize the fact that these are not a bunch of freeloaders."

https://time.com/6917638/senior-working-royals/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.

People care because they post here and there is nothing you can do about it. She is part of the royal family. Harry can't change is parentage.

It's sad people desperately want to see her included with these racist white colonizers. There's some deep seated self hatred going on here. But, you do you.

It isn't desperation--it is a fact. She is part of the royal family.

Sure she is. Which is why we never see her with anyone else or at any official events.

No everyone hangs around their family. And going to official events isn't the definition of family. We can go back and forth all day on this if you want.

We can but you'd still be wrong. They are living the LA life and dream, not a royal or British one by any stretch.

While being related to and therefore being in the royal family. If you want to start a thread of fashions of "working members of the royal family" do so but the third cousins and Spencer's and 'em wouldn't be allowed to be included, nor the Middletons.

Working members of the royal family, for your reference:

Who are the working royals?
There are currently 11 working members of the royal family: King Charles III and Queen Camilla, the Prince and Princess of Wales, Princess Anne, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, the Duke of Kent and Princess Alexandra.

Though given how few appearances and a lack of strong name recognition, many experts don't consider the Gloucesters or Princess Alexandra part of the core unit of senior working royals. With the King and Kate unavailable, that leaves just five people to take on the bulk of public engagements.

What do senior working royals do?
Working royals are people who support the King in his role as head of state, Clare McHugh, royal historian and author of The Romanov Brides tells TIME. “The monarchy is no longer just a rich family that does what they want," she says. "In the last century, gradually, the wealth and the family has been streamlined, in order to emphasize the fact that these are not a bunch of freeloaders."

https://time.com/6917638/senior-working-royals/

So also, Zara, Beatrice and crew not included.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charming in various shades of blue

Why are the vast majority of pics are being posted from 4-5 years ago when she was an active royal? If she's relevant and still very royal now, why post these ancient pics? What's fashionable about this?