BRF Fashion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Beautiful in vivid orchid! Would never think to match with blue shoes but it works, more modern than black or nude.

The blue shoes sort of work as a color blocking scheme. Shoe pairing with a bold, single tone dress color is always a challenge. I would’ve gone with nude or matching purple pumps. But the blue does sort of work!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lady Amelia Windsor, granddaughter of the Duke of Kent, stunning in a floral dress in Summer 2022. Definitely keeping my eye on this fashionable younger member of the royal family!

Love the look. The dress is pretty in itself but her body shape wears it perfectly and it looks amazing with her skin tone and hair. Fabulous look!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Beautiful in birds ha ha

Love. Reminds me of Oscar de la Renta in the 90s. Amazing dress!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Savvy in silk! Silk screams elegance.

Oh my, I disagree. She looks completely fine, but the color does nothing for her. I think she would’ve looked much better in a starchy white button down shirt and a pencil skirt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Beautiful in vivid orchid! Would never think to match with blue shoes but it works, more modern than black or nude.

The blue shoes sort of work as a color blocking scheme. Shoe pairing with a bold, single tone dress color is always a challenge. I would’ve gone with nude or matching purple pumps. But the blue does sort of work!

This dress is not flattering at all. She’s had much better looks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

That’s a hazard when you guys try to start yet another thread to fawn over Kate but there are no recent pictures of Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

That’s a hazard when you guys try to start yet another thread to fawn over Kate but there are no recent pictures of Kate.

Bam!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

That’s a hazard when you guys try to start yet another thread to fawn over Kate but there are no recent pictures of Kate.

Apparently Kate is showing up at Wimbledon tomorrow (really bad optics imo, but nobody asked me), so there will be more Kate fodder for this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Princess Anne's daughter Zara Tindall was also there with her husband Mike:

Wearing the same dress Queen Mary wore a few days ago.


ME+EM is very popular for the Royal (and royal-adjacent) ladies.

Here is Carole Middleton at Wimbledon in a blazer from that brand as well:

Carole Middleton wore the green floral ME+EM dress too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Savvy in silk! Silk screams elegance.

Oh my, I disagree. She looks completely fine, but the color does nothing for her. I think she would’ve looked much better in a starchy white button down shirt and a pencil skirt.

That was her Suits uniform, she can't do that anymore with drawing inevitable cattiness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG, Meg-stan is getting old. Enough already, we don't want to see 2+ year old pictures, we want new and fresh.

Post some new pics of Kate then.

Megan and Kate don’t exist in a vacuum where we have to pit them against each other. C’mon PP, let’s do better! They are all beautiful women who have some hits and misses.

DP. It's Kate's worshippers who don't want to see Meghan's face, as the "Meg-stan" pp just proved without a doubt. Methinks the person posting all the Meghan pictures is trolling them.

Meghan isn't royal and isn't even attending royal events. She's just another LA wanna be influencer.

Meow. Meghan married a royal, which makes her a lot more adjacent than the Spencer sisters.

But with no HRH who cares? They have stepped back from the family. Quite deliberately.