Nikki Haley - What are the chances

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

Someone needs to ask her that.

If it weren’t for big old bad US government, then slaves would not have been freed in the 1860s and probably not for many decades afterward.

[Anonymous]

The real question Americans should be asking themselves is why, over the past few decades, there has been an increasing leadership vacuum in the House, Senate and candidates for POTUS ?

My speculation is that beginning with Kissinger era of his basically via his dual role as Sec State and Chief of NSC, the engine that has been primed in thos country is not our democratic institutional systems but the nexus of CIA/DNI, military contractors, communications spyware and lobbyists draining away generation after generation of people who could have lead this country to a better future to instead just focus on narrow interest of accumulating their 1% 'er status and attempt to dominate abroad.

Of course, what has been sacrificed is America's reputation not just in global south ( which they don't care about ), but among our Allies, the middle class in America, aspects of our infrastructure ( roads, bridges, electrical grid, schools, health care - basically anything that is not military or spyware related) and , ultimately the undermining of our civil institutions: Congress ( the Johnsons , the Majory Taylor Greenes) , SCOTUS ( Thomas, Alito ) and the lobbyist revolving door in Washington half of whom work for Saudi Arabia despite their attacking us on 9/11.

So, here it is the eve before 2024 election and the choices are: 1) a rapist/ fraudster and fascist 2) an Octogenarian in/out of mental acuity whose Nose is so far up Israel's A** that his last public act as POTUS is going to be to arm, fund and support Genocide or 3) A light weight SC Gov of Indian descent who at her core seems to miss the fact that every political idea she supports would reject her parents on the basis of their ancestry

[Anonymous]

Why is this any of this a surprise to intelligent voters? Haley has always been as slimy as the rest of the GOP. The mask just slipped off further than it normally does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

This is one of the dumbest statements a politician has made. Freedom to enslave people is a good thing! Wow!

[Anonymous]

What are the chances? Zero. Her chance is zero. The GOP is Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real question Americans should be asking themselves is why, over the past few decades, there has been an increasing leadership vacuum in the House, Senate and candidates for POTUS ?

My speculation is that beginning with Kissinger era of his basically via his dual role as Sec State and Chief of NSC, the engine that has been primed in thos country is not our democratic institutional systems but the nexus of CIA/DNI, military contractors, communications spyware and lobbyists draining away generation after generation of people who could have lead this country to a better future to instead just focus on narrow interest of accumulating their 1% 'er status and attempt to dominate abroad.

Of course, what has been sacrificed is America's reputation not just in global south ( which they don't care about ), but among our Allies, the middle class in America, aspects of our infrastructure ( roads, bridges, electrical grid, schools, health care - basically anything that is not military or spyware related) and , ultimately the undermining of our civil institutions: Congress ( the Johnsons , the Majory Taylor Greenes) , SCOTUS ( Thomas, Alito ) and the lobbyist revolving door in Washington half of whom work for Saudi Arabia despite their attacking us on 9/11.

So, here it is the eve before 2024 election and the choices are: 1) a rapist/ fraudster and fascist 2) an Octogenarian in/out of mental acuity whose Nose is so far up Israel's A** that his last public act as POTUS is going to be to arm, fund and support Genocide or 3) A light weight SC Gov of Indian descent who at her core seems to miss the fact that every political idea she supports would reject her parents on the basis of their ancestry

Yes, it is all the Jews fault, right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess it was a trick question, LOL

Okay so I guess she will have a historically accurate answer if asked the same question again?

Reporters, this is really, really easy: “So Governor Haley, just to clarify, do you believe the Civil War was fought over slavery?”

Even better, "do you acknowledge that South Carolina started the Civil War so that the white people of the state could continue to own other people?"

This would be false, as the vast majority of whites didn't own any slaves and that, even more telling, some blacks did.

Some of you are as ignorant as Haley herself.

Haha. That you think South Carolina started the war so *black* people could own slaves is enormously ignorant. What are you trying to sell us here?

[Anonymous]

The Republican Party can’t hear about salvery being bad.
They can’t say it and their voters don’t want to hear it.
That’s where we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget Ronnie has been busy wiping mentions of slavery from school curriculums

The irony

You sure about that, Skippy? Instruction about slavery is very much a REQUIRED part of Florida school curriculums. But you knew that. You just didn't think anyone would call you on it.

https://www.fldoe.org/academics/standards/subject-areas/social-studies/african-amer-hist.stml

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

Just continue not actually listening to what she said and being outraged about something she was very clear about. You people look even more foolish than usual, pretending this is means anything. She very clearly clarified her points. And she's right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real question Americans should be asking themselves is why, over the past few decades, there has been an increasing leadership vacuum in the House, Senate and candidates for POTUS ?

My speculation is that beginning with Kissinger era of his basically via his dual role as Sec State and Chief of NSC, the engine that has been primed in thos country is not our democratic institutional systems but the nexus of CIA/DNI, military contractors, communications spyware and lobbyists draining away generation after generation of people who could have lead this country to a better future to instead just focus on narrow interest of accumulating their 1% 'er status and attempt to dominate abroad.

Of course, what has been sacrificed is America's reputation not just in global south ( which they don't care about ), but among our Allies, the middle class in America, aspects of our infrastructure ( roads, bridges, electrical grid, schools, health care - basically anything that is not military or spyware related) and , ultimately the undermining of our civil institutions: Congress ( the Johnsons , the Majory Taylor Greenes) , SCOTUS ( Thomas, Alito ) and the lobbyist revolving door in Washington half of whom work for Saudi Arabia despite their attacking us on 9/11.

So, here it is the eve before 2024 election and the choices are: 1) a rapist/ fraudster and fascist 2) an Octogenarian in/out of mental acuity whose Nose is so far up Israel's A** that his last public act as POTUS is going to be to arm, fund and support Genocide or 3) A light weight SC Gov of Indian descent who at her core seems to miss the fact that every political idea she supports would reject her parents on the basis of their ancestry

Gerrymandering has a lot to do with it for the House.
The Electoral College and focus in national elections on fewer than 10 states, and now more like 5, for Presidency
Structural tilt to rural white for the senate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

+1

What could possibly be bigger than slavery?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

This is one of the dumbest statements a politician has made. Freedom to enslave people is a good thing! Wow!

If you think she’s going to lose a single primary vote over this, you really don’t understand where the Republican Party is right now. If anything this will get her more votes.

[Anonymous]

It won't help her as a national, general election candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So freedom to what....own slaves?

The GOP candidates are twisting themselves into knots trying to avoid facts about our country's past to the point of absurdity.

+1

What could possibly be bigger than slavery?

She says: "It was a given that it was about slavery." Duh. Why are you all so intent on looking idiotic?