
Self-affirmation bias. |
True, the new process should make this clear in a couple of years, but the pro-prep posters will say anything to get back their easily gameable selection process. It was easier to predict outcomes when you could simply buy test answers. |
What are you talking about?
Kids from some middle schools are much dumber. Good lord, this board is unhinged. |
We paid attention to the TJ admission process this year because my 9th grader had a number of friends who he went through AAP with who applied. Having learned alongside the kids since 3rd grade, my son had a pretty good sense of who is academically strong and who struggles. The results seemed, at best, random, and at worst upside down with the weaker kids more likely to get in. The results didn't follow along racial lines -- brilliant accomplished math-focused kid from Ethiopia was waitlisted and the white kid who was the last one to get concepts in math did. It struck me that TJ is becoming a lottery school with a GPA cutoff. It will still be somewhat superior due to the prerequisites but plenty of kids meet those. My prediction is it slowly sinks, and then, on "equity" grounds, the school district will kill AAP and eliminate the TJ admission prerequisites. |
That's weird at our school all the top kids were selected, but I think most parents don't really know what's going on. |
Wow close to 38% (165 students from class of 2024) qualified as National Merit semifinalists. Around 63% of the FCPS semifinalist are from TJ. |
Everyone knew the students who were only able to get in because of test buying were bound to impact the school's standing. |
The ranking was based on test scores from classes admitted under the prior system. Are we back to the theory that the board invented a time machine to install the current system before those tests were taken? |
At my daughter's best friend's middle school, a kid who was off the charts in math acceleration and had already published some scientific paper from a summer internship (seriously) did not get in. My daughter's friend did not and is now taking AP precalculus and AP statistics as a freshman in her base high school. Much weaker kids did get in. The results seemed truly random. |
As a non TJ parent, what’s surprising to me is that why not all of them or majority qualify in as NMSF, with the sort of brainpower TJ has it’s disappointing that only 38% qualified. Are majority kids there just average? |
165 is a very strong number for TJ historically. The number is usually in the 120-140 range. You're talking about being in the absolute elite among PSAT test takers. I would bet you have a total of maybe 20-30 in the rest of FCPS (perhaps the nation's strongest overall school district) combine. |
It’s public information. 165 at TJ and 99 spread out at 14 other FCPS high schools, with McLean, Oakton, Chantilly, and Langley having the most of the non-magnet schools. |
If it were only Math most likely all of the class of 2024 would be qualified. Math is easy and most would have scored perfect (it would be interesting to see that stats, if available). The language component is counted twice. I think most of the kids strong in STEM but relatively weaker in language (reading, and writing) will be impacted. The Selection Index score is calculated by doubling the sum of the Reading, Writing and Language, and Math Test scores. For example, a Reading score of 23, a Writing and Language score of 20, and a Math score of 26.5 would result in a Selection Index score of 139, i.e., 2(23+20+26.5). |
That's a PHENOMENAL number for the rest of FCPS. Bad news for those who would argue that COVID was devastating in terms of learning loss in this area - sounds like we did a LOT better than everyone else! |
It's because in VA you only needed a score of 219 to be NMS this year. |