Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because it’s difficult to get into sidwell, and your child will be surrounded by other very talented kids and get a very rigorous education, you will think logically that your child will have a shot at a college perhaps similar to Sidwell in competitiveness. However, for those applying, think long and hard about the reality. You will be paying >50 k a year for a school that actually does not take a real interest in celebrating your kids or helping your kids get in to college. Rather, they want you to be grateful for the Quaker education that will prepare your children for life. You will be encouraged —strongly—to make sure your child’s college list includes schools like American U, Drexel, Sarah Lawrence, Indiana U, VCU, Loyola Marymount. This despite the fact that your child may have scored a 1550 on the SAT with a 3.7 GPA. In the current test-optional environment, schools that have grade deflation and unweighted GPAs, like Sidwell, do their students a disservice. The landscape has totally changed. The message is the same for all students. You might want to put that $ in the bank and have your child find a really successful niche at your public school. The teaching at Sidwell can be very good, but it’s not exceptional. The quality of the kids is outstanding. But the administration cares more deeply about the school’s reputation than the kids themselves. (this is not written about the lower school).
1) there is nothing wrong with those schools
2) there isn't anyone who has gone to any of those schools, in some cases, ever.
3) the colleges know the rigor of the school, but the reality is, in an era where there are 1000-2000 applicants for each available seat, it is hard for anyone to stand out.