Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Buzzfeed?

It's quite possible to selectively compare examples while ignoring everything else, including the flattering press Meghan received. You just want to ignore those because it doesn't fit your narrative.

The Royals have decades of nasty press behind them. Every single one of them has been brutally raked over in the media. Even Kate. None of you were clearly alive at the peak Fergie scandals of the 1990s / early 2000s.

Meghan just can't cope. And she didn't want to deal with the royal duty. That's something most of you are missing on this thread. Being royal isn't just about having photographs taken. It's mostly duty. Acting as a symbol of the British state even when opening a hospital or going to a military concert. It's endless rota of duty. That's 99% of what the Queen does.

And now they're moving to Canada, which is likely just a pit stop on the way somewhere else. But what is their future? To be symbols of something. Well, newsflash, that means more press. They know that. The nasty press isn't going away. But what is going away is the obligation of duty. She wants to have the status/"influence" of the Duchess of Sussex without any of the duty obligation and that is why she's not popular in the UK any more. People would have a lot more respect if the pair intended to move to a farm and live a simple country life but that's not their plan, is it? They want to be influencers. They fully intend to be in the public eye. But without the titles and royal status they have no claim or merit to be an influencer. Which means they will only be a different kind of celebrity parasite.

[Anonymous]

Exactly. Now they just look like grifters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

That's obscene. Such double standards.

Anyone who follows the Royals knows that you could pull out headlines showing the poor treatment of any Royal.

Can you pull some nasty Kate headlines then?

Not pp but the UK press nicknamed her "Waity Katy" because she hung around for EIGHT years before they got married.

Which turned out to be the smart thing to do considering Meghan couldn’t even make it 2!

What? This makes no sense. Meghan didn’t have to hang around, as Harry proposed relatively quickly.

Kate waited around while Wills was out sowing his wild oats, as she had no ambition to do anything with her life, save for marrying William.

[Anonymous]

For all you Meghan haters, Harry considered leaving his role in the BRF long before he met her. He has wanted to get out of the business of being a Royal for a long time.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4636038/I-wanted-confesses-Harry-reluctant-prince.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Buzzfeed?

It's quite possible to selectively compare examples while ignoring everything else, including the flattering press Meghan received. You just want to ignore those because it doesn't fit your narrative.

The Royals have decades of nasty press behind them. Every single one of them has been brutally raked over in the media. Even Kate. None of you were clearly alive at the peak Fergie scandals of the 1990s / early 2000s.

Meghan just can't cope. And she didn't want to deal with the royal duty. That's something most of you are missing on this thread. Being royal isn't just about having photographs taken. It's mostly duty. Acting as a symbol of the British state even when opening a hospital or going to a military concert. It's endless rota of duty. That's 99% of what the Queen does.

And now they're moving to Canada, which is likely just a pit stop on the way somewhere else. But what is their future? To be symbols of something. Well, newsflash, that means more press. They know that. The nasty press isn't going away. But what is going away is the obligation of duty. She wants to have the status/"influence" of the Duchess of Sussex without any of the duty obligation and that is why she's not popular in the UK any more. People would have a lot more respect if the pair intended to move to a farm and live a simple country life but that's not their plan, is it? They want to be influencers. They fully intend to be in the public eye. But without the titles and royal status they have no claim or merit to be an influencer. Which means they will only be a different kind of celebrity parasite.

Aka being a modern feminist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Buzzfeed?

It's quite possible to selectively compare examples while ignoring everything else, including the flattering press Meghan received. You just want to ignore those because it doesn't fit your narrative.

The Royals have decades of nasty press behind them. Every single one of them has been brutally raked over in the media. Even Kate. None of you were clearly alive at the peak Fergie scandals of the 1990s / early 2000s.

Meghan just can't cope. And she didn't want to deal with the royal duty. That's something most of you are missing on this thread. Being royal isn't just about having photographs taken. It's mostly duty. Acting as a symbol of the British state even when opening a hospital or going to a military concert. It's endless rota of duty. That's 99% of what the Queen does.

And now they're moving to Canada, which is likely just a pit stop on the way somewhere else. But what is their future? To be symbols of something. Well, newsflash, that means more press. They know that. The nasty press isn't going away. But what is going away is the obligation of duty. She wants to have the status/"influence" of the Duchess of Sussex without any of the duty obligation and that is why she's not popular in the UK any more. People would have a lot more respect if the pair intended to move to a farm and live a simple country life but that's not their plan, is it? They want to be influencers. They fully intend to be in the public eye. But without the titles and royal status they have no claim or merit to be an influencer. Which means they will only be a different kind of celebrity parasite.

Aka being a modern feminist.

Oh hey there misogynist. How's your day going?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Buzzfeed?

It's quite possible to selectively compare examples while ignoring everything else, including the flattering press Meghan received. You just want to ignore those because it doesn't fit your narrative.

The Royals have decades of nasty press behind them. Every single one of them has been brutally raked over in the media. Even Kate. None of you were clearly alive at the peak Fergie scandals of the 1990s / early 2000s.

Meghan just can't cope. And she didn't want to deal with the royal duty. That's something most of you are missing on this thread. Being royal isn't just about having photographs taken. It's mostly duty. Acting as a symbol of the British state even when opening a hospital or going to a military concert. It's endless rota of duty. That's 99% of what the Queen does.

And now they're moving to Canada, which is likely just a pit stop on the way somewhere else. But what is their future? To be symbols of something. Well, newsflash, that means more press. They know that. The nasty press isn't going away. But what is going away is the obligation of duty. She wants to have the status/"influence" of the Duchess of Sussex without any of the duty obligation and that is why she's not popular in the UK any more. People would have a lot more respect if the pair intended to move to a farm and live a simple country life but that's not their plan, is it? They want to be influencers. They fully intend to be in the public eye. But without the titles and royal status they have no claim or merit to be an influencer. Which means they will only be a different kind of celebrity parasite.

Aka being a modern feminist.

Oh hey there misogynist. How's your day going?

Yawn. Still a bit tired. How about you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. Now they just look like grifters.

Maybe to you. To me and a lot of other people (see the majority positive international coverage) they look smart: they are protecting their child, setting up a way to independent wealth, and getting themselves away from a toxic family. Seems brilliant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Buzzfeed?

It's quite possible to selectively compare examples while ignoring everything else, including the flattering press Meghan received. You just want to ignore those because it doesn't fit your narrative.

The Royals have decades of nasty press behind them. Every single one of them has been brutally raked over in the media. Even Kate. None of you were clearly alive at the peak Fergie scandals of the 1990s / early 2000s.

Meghan just can't cope. And she didn't want to deal with the royal duty. That's something most of you are missing on this thread. Being royal isn't just about having photographs taken. It's mostly duty. Acting as a symbol of the British state even when opening a hospital or going to a military concert. It's endless rota of duty. That's 99% of what the Queen does.

And now they're moving to Canada, which is likely just a pit stop on the way somewhere else. But what is their future? To be symbols of something. Well, newsflash, that means more press. They know that. The nasty press isn't going away. But what is going away is the obligation of duty. She wants to have the status/"influence" of the Duchess of Sussex without any of the duty obligation and that is why she's not popular in the UK any more. People would have a lot more respect if the pair intended to move to a farm and live a simple country life but that's not their plan, is it? They want to be influencers. They fully intend to be in the public eye. But without the titles and royal status they have no claim or merit to be an influencer. Which means they will only be a different kind of celebrity parasite.

It was circulating here the day before it was "published" in Buzzfeed. Seems like something her PR team put together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

Holy hell that is shameful.

The headlines about fashion are especially bad - same columnist, one month apart. As are the ones about the bump cradling, and the queen missing the christenings.

Megan’s bump holding was way over the top.

Ha! A few pages ago there were people on DCUM saying they agreed with the headlines! That the way Meghan put her hands was “showy” and narcissistic. The way Kate did it was maternal. It’s insane.

Have you seen the pictures? No one I know held their bump with both hands like they were afraid something was going to fall out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

That's obscene. Such double standards.

Anyone who follows the Royals knows that you could pull out headlines showing the poor treatment of any Royal.

Can you pull some nasty Kate headlines then?

DP. Kate Middleton was taunted as Waity Katie for years, the paps used to be on her face everyday as she made her way to work. There was a huge national debate on whether the future king would be allowed to marry a “commoner

+1
By the same rags that now gush over her.

[Anonymous]

DP. Yes. I've seen the belly pictures. And I think the people criticizing that are outing themselves as totally nuts. Do you realize how crazy you sound when you talk about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly. Now they just look like grifters.

Maybe to you. To me and a lot of other people (see the majority positive international coverage) they look smart: they are protecting their child, setting up a way to independent wealth, and getting themselves away from a toxic family. Seems brilliant.

Did you miss this part of the discussion from the last few pages? They want to have her cake and eat it too. Not respect commanding behavior.

[Anonymous]

I have a feeling the same awful RRs won’t stop negative press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was this already shared?

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal?utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bfsharefacebook&ref=mobile_share

That's obscene. Such double standards.

Anyone who follows the Royals knows that you could pull out headlines showing the poor treatment of any Royal.

Can you pull some nasty Kate headlines then?

Not pp but the UK press nicknamed her "Waity Katy" because she hung around for EIGHT years before they got married.

Which turned out to be the smart thing to do considering Meghan couldn’t even make it 2!

What? This makes no sense. Meghan didn’t have to hang around, as Harry proposed relatively quickly.

Kate waited around while Wills was out sowing his wild oats, as she had no ambition to do anything with her life, save for marrying William.

She met him at 19, not 36. Of course they stayed together for several years before getting engaged. But this is besides the point, she was taunted with Waity Katie for years, often to her face, because she wasn't a member of the family and there were fewer restrictions on the press. Her parents were fashioned as country bumpkins, social climbers, her sister was hounded. Let's be honest, it wasn't the press that drove the Sussexes decision, they just didn't want to be second fiddle and I can't say I blame them.