Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).

If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.

[Anonymous]

Agree!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).

If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.

Nor should they allow the most progressive and vocal activists to prevail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).

If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.

Nor should they allow the most progressive and vocal activists to prevail.

Really hoping for a middle of the road approach (btw, option 3 is not middle of the road).

[Anonymous]

Option 3 is the best one

[Anonymous]

option 3 is stupid and insane

[Anonymous]

it would have been nice if Flo Analytics had any background at all in education policy but I guess since they were the only bidders, MCPS didn't have much choice.

[Anonymous]

Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

dear lord. what is the 'right thing'?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

dear lord. what is the 'right thing'?

Diversity bus

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

Well that's not promising.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

Well that's not promising.

I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this

[Anonymous]

What is wrong with diversity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?

DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”

Well that's not promising.

I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this

I'm not squirming. We can afford private and can afford to move. But I think it's a bad sign for the county -- we are certainly not the only family prepared to move.