2024 Democratic National Convention

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.
.

The print edition article from 825/24 is not available on line yet😊 so can’t post a link.

However the data Clinton presented was “carefully cherry-picked” and used arbitrary cut off points. You’ll have to pick up a paper, if you even know what that is lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.

Why is it gaslighting to ask him about the felon's statement?
Cotton's the one gaslighting about how it was out of context.


I don't believe you watched the whole video, so I'll spell it out. To Cotton called out Jonathan Karl for calling Harris a moderate dem, by noting her former campaign promise to end private healthcare. Karl said she's no longer doing this, which IS gaslighting because she hasn't voiced whether she'll change her stance on the issue. Karl is making false claims.

ABC is comfortable with calling her a moderate Dem, yet in 2019 she was voted as the most liberal member of the Senate. What changed? My guess...nothing. The networks are inventing a persona that does not reflect reality. I wouldn't be thrilled to debate on their network either. Yet, Trump is pressing on and there will be a debate.

This is what got the convicted rapist's diapers in a wad:
Cotton was asked about this:
"“It’s the equivalent of the Congressional Medal of Honor but civilian version. It’s actually much better because everyone [who] gets the Congressional Medal of Honor, they're soldiers. They’re either in very bad shape because they’ve been hit so many times by bullets or they’re dead”

And Mr. "I'm an Army Ranger" himself tried gaslighting his way out of it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.
.

The print edition article from 825/24 is not available on line yet😊 so can’t post a link.

However the data Clinton presented was “carefully cherry-picked” and used arbitrary cut off points. You’ll have to pick up a paper, if you even know what that is lol


The other lies were: removal of lead pipes, stats about child deaths from guns ( included 19 year olds), Trump as the mastermind of a tax scam, Harris conveniently overlooked Bidens plans for spending cuts in the military when Harris said “ I will ensure the US always has the strongest fighting force”

She’s a disaster, proceed with caution.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/22/dnc-fact-check-democratic-national-convention-day-3/

From your "proof" source
"By starting during George H.W. Bush’s term, Clinton skips over Ronald Reagan, a Republican who oversaw the creation of 16 million jobs. Instead, the period covered by his statistic included three Republicans — Bush, his son George W. Bush and Trump — who had poor jobs records. About 1 million jobs were created from November 1989 to the end of the first Bush term, 1.4 million under his son, and then a negative 2.7 million under Trump (because of the pandemic). All three Republicans ended their terms with the country in economic downturns.

By contrast, 22.9 million jobs were created under Clinton, 11.6 million under Barack Obama and 15.8 million under President Joe Biden.

You will note that gives the Democrats 50.3 million jobs and the Republicans a negative 300,000. Perhaps Clinton thought that would sound too fantastical. So it appears as if he dated his statistic from January 1989, which results in a total of 51.5 million jobs, with about 1.3 million for Republicans."

It still shows Democratic administrations are far, far better than Republican administrations at job growth.
You think you can learn something today, Jethro?


Even adding Reagan's numbers which are the best GOP jobs statistic since WWII, it means that Replublicans since 1980 have added a total of about $17M jobs to Democratics $51+M jobs. It reduces the difference from 50:1 to 3:1. So including the absolute best record Republicans have achieved means that Democratic administrations still created 3x the number of jobs that Republican administrations have created. And that difference was only due to one president.


Everyone uses the 1988 metric because it is the beginning of the modern globalization era. But sure, even going back to Reagan, it is still a proven fact that democrats are better for the economy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.
.

The print edition article from 825/24 is not available on line yet😊 so can’t post a link.

However the data Clinton presented was “carefully cherry-picked” and used arbitrary cut off points. You’ll have to pick up a paper, if you even know what that is lol


The other lies were: removal of lead pipes, stats about child deaths from guns ( included 19 year olds), Trump as the mastermind of a tax scam, Harris conveniently overlooked Bidens plans for spending cuts in the military when Harris said “ I will ensure the US always has the strongest fighting force”

She’s a disaster, proceed with caution.


Cutting wasteful spending is good governance. One can cut defense spending and still have the strongest fighting force in the world.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?


Anyone?


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.


project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.



Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.


Uh huh. Kamala was Biden’s immigration Czar.

Exactly. What a disaster Kamala is.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans give the rich tax breaks.


Businesses create jobs. Democrats raise company taxes and raise wages for low skill jobs meant for teenagers, which cause businesses to close and jobs to die. Watch and learn.

I have watched and learned. Since I graduated from high school, businesses have created fifty times more jobs under Democratic administrations than Republican administrations.


Republicans usually get voted into office when it's time to clean-up after the kids. Historically, Dems spend like crazy on social programs until they set up a recession for the republicans in office. Also, if by create jobs you mean creating government programs that invent administrative positions, then yes. And it's paid for with American's hard-earned tax dollars.

Not to mention, all of the regulations and taxes they create burden small business to the degree they close or struggle to exist. This hardly deserves a round of applause. Dems indirectly are the reason big business wins and small businesses fail. I know. Nuance is hard when you're willing to waste a vote on "joy."



You have it exactly backwards, and you know it, gaslighter.
Republicans always cut taxes and crash the economy so Democrats are elected to take us out of recession and fix it, which they do spectacularly.
But then, once the white suburbanites are doing well again, they decide they don’t want to pay taxes, so they vote for a Republican who cuts taxes and crashes the economy.
Repeat cycle.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?


Anyone?


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.


project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.



Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.


Uh huh. Kamala was Biden’s immigration Czar.

Exactly. What a disaster Kamala is.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans give the rich tax breaks.


Businesses create jobs. Democrats raise company taxes and raise wages for low skill jobs meant for teenagers, which cause businesses to close and jobs to die. Watch and learn.

I have watched and learned. Since I graduated from high school, businesses have created fifty times more jobs under Democratic administrations than Republican administrations.


Republicans usually get voted into office when it's time to clean-up after the kids. Historically, Dems spend like crazy on social programs until they set up a recession for the republicans in office. Also, if by create jobs you mean creating government programs that invent administrative positions, then yes. And it's paid for with American's hard-earned tax dollars.

Not to mention, all of the regulations and taxes they create burden small business to the degree they close or struggle to exist. This hardly deserves a round of applause. Dems indirectly are the reason big business wins and small businesses fail. I know. Nuance is hard when you're willing to waste a vote on "joy."



You have it exactly backwards, and you know it, gaslighter.
Republicans always cut taxes and crash the economy so Democrats are elected to take us out of recession and fix it, which they do spectacularly.
But then, once the white suburbanites are doing well again, they decide they don’t want to pay taxes, so they vote for a Republican who cuts taxes and crashes the economy.
Repeat cycle.


Please enlighten us about high-speed job creation works. I can't wait.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?


Anyone?


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.


project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.



Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.


Uh huh. Kamala was Biden’s immigration Czar.

Exactly. What a disaster Kamala is.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans give the rich tax breaks.


Businesses create jobs. Democrats raise company taxes and raise wages for low skill jobs meant for teenagers, which cause businesses to close and jobs to die. Watch and learn.

I have watched and learned. Since I graduated from high school, businesses have created fifty times more jobs under Democratic administrations than Republican administrations.


Republicans usually get voted into office when it's time to clean-up after the kids. Historically, Dems spend like crazy on social programs until they set up a recession for the republicans in office. Also, if by create jobs you mean creating government programs that invent administrative positions, then yes. And it's paid for with American's hard-earned tax dollars.

Not to mention, all of the regulations and taxes they create burden small business to the degree they close or struggle to exist. This hardly deserves a round of applause. Dems indirectly are the reason big business wins and small businesses fail. I know. Nuance is hard when you're willing to waste a vote on "joy."



You have it exactly backwards, and you know it, gaslighter.
Republicans always cut taxes and crash the economy so Democrats are elected to take us out of recession and fix it, which they do spectacularly.
But then, once the white suburbanites are doing well again, they decide they don’t want to pay taxes, so they vote for a Republican who cuts taxes and crashes the economy.
Repeat cycle.


Please enlighten us about high-speed job creation works. I can't wait.

DP. Is this supposed to be in English?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.


Not saying I'm a fan of Cotton. I was actually expecting the video to show another faux complaint. But yes. The networks are letting Harris coast and showing their partisanship. It's no longer a rumor. It's out there in the wide open for all to see, which is unsettling.

Pardon me for not being comfortable with the networks deciding who should and shouldn't be president. That's supposed to be the role of voters.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.
.

The print edition article from 825/24 is not available on line yet😊 so can’t post a link.

However the data Clinton presented was “carefully cherry-picked” and used arbitrary cut off points. You’ll have to pick up a paper, if you even know what that is lol


It wasn't cherry picked with arbitrary cutoff points, just using data from 1989, which is handy because we have had equal number of years under R and D presidencies. If you feel that doesn't go back far enough, you can check for yourself, how job growths have been since WWII - the Democrats still come out ahead by about 30 million.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?


Anyone?


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.


project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.



Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.


Uh huh. Kamala was Biden’s immigration Czar.

Exactly. What a disaster Kamala is.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans give the rich tax breaks.


Businesses create jobs. Democrats raise company taxes and raise wages for low skill jobs meant for teenagers, which cause businesses to close and jobs to die. Watch and learn.

I have watched and learned. Since I graduated from high school, businesses have created fifty times more jobs under Democratic administrations than Republican administrations.


Republicans usually get voted into office when it's time to clean-up after the kids. Historically, Dems spend like crazy on social programs until they set up a recession for the republicans in office. Also, if by create jobs you mean creating government programs that invent administrative positions, then yes. And it's paid for with American's hard-earned tax dollars.

Not to mention, all of the regulations and taxes they create burden small business to the degree they close or struggle to exist. This hardly deserves a round of applause. Dems indirectly are the reason big business wins and small businesses fail. I know. Nuance is hard when you're willing to waste a vote on "joy."



You have it exactly backwards, and you know it, gaslighter.
Republicans always cut taxes and crash the economy so Democrats are elected to take us out of recession and fix it, which they do spectacularly.
But then, once the white suburbanites are doing well again, they decide they don’t want to pay taxes, so they vote for a Republican who cuts taxes and crashes the economy.
Repeat cycle.


Please enlighten us about high-speed job creation works. I can't wait.


What the hell is "high-speed job creation"?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.


Not saying I'm a fan of Cotton. I was actually expecting the video to show another faux complaint. But yes. The networks are letting Harris coast and showing their partisanship. It's no longer a rumor. It's out there in the wide open for all to see, which is unsettling.

Pardon me for not being comfortable with the networks deciding who should and shouldn't be president. That's supposed to be the role of voters.




+1. Well said.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The WaPo had a lengthy article that detailed all the u truths presented at the DNC as facts, including the “jobs data”. Dig deeper folks.


Fake news. Cite?


Here’s one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/23/fact-check-dnc-kamala-harris-day-4/

I’m sure there are more

Nothing about jobs in there. Try again.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/22/dnc-fact-check-democratic-national-convention-day-3/

From your "proof" source
"By starting during George H.W. Bush’s term, Clinton skips over Ronald Reagan, a Republican who oversaw the creation of 16 million jobs. Instead, the period covered by his statistic included three Republicans — Bush, his son George W. Bush and Trump — who had poor jobs records. About 1 million jobs were created from November 1989 to the end of the first Bush term, 1.4 million under his son, and then a negative 2.7 million under Trump (because of the pandemic). All three Republicans ended their terms with the country in economic downturns.

By contrast, 22.9 million jobs were created under Clinton, 11.6 million under Barack Obama and 15.8 million under President Joe Biden.

You will note that gives the Democrats 50.3 million jobs and the Republicans a negative 300,000. Perhaps Clinton thought that would sound too fantastical. So it appears as if he dated his statistic from January 1989, which results in a total of 51.5 million jobs, with about 1.3 million for Republicans."

It still shows Democratic administrations are far, far better than Republican administrations at job growth.
You think you can learn something today, Jethro?


Even adding Reagan's numbers which are the best GOP jobs statistic since WWII, it means that Replublicans since 1980 have added a total of about $17M jobs to Democratics $51+M jobs. It reduces the difference from 50:1 to 3:1. So including the absolute best record Republicans have achieved means that Democratic administrations still created 3x the number of jobs that Republican administrations have created. And that difference was only due to one president.


Everyone uses the 1988 metric because it is the beginning of the modern globalization era. But sure, even going back to Reagan, it is still a proven fact that democrats are better for the economy.


Yup, post (or as near as can be aligned with the start of a president's term) the fall of the USSR. Job growth under Reagan's 8 years in office, robust as it was, is equivalent to job growth under Biden's 3 1/2 years in office.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why was that one woman talking about someone taking her wedding ring off her finger over her dead gay body? Who is talking about taking away gay marriage?


Anyone?


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/gop-2024-platform-shift-same-sex-marriage-rcna164517

Republicans lost so hard on gay marriage that they've gone quiet about it. That doesn't mean they'll stay quiet if they start winning more power again.

+1 They and their plans Project 2025 want gay people back in the closet.


project 2025 is not associated with trump. He has disavowed it many times

The man lies so much, you don’t know when he is telling his truth or another lie. How do you know he is speaking truth now. What we do know is that the architects of Project 2025 are former members of Trumps White House, the far-right Heritage Foundation, and the republican vice president nominee. So you want people to take the word of a habitual LIAR when the proof is in the pudding that he is for it. We also know that trump agrees with the last person in the room and is easily persuaded by flattery and money.



Trump privately supports Project 2025 because his followers support it.

He also support QAnon because it helped with the white, suburban housewife vote.

He’s lying again. He still supporting Project 2025.


Uh huh. Kamala was Biden’s immigration Czar.

Exactly. What a disaster Kamala is.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans give the rich tax breaks.


Businesses create jobs. Democrats raise company taxes and raise wages for low skill jobs meant for teenagers, which cause businesses to close and jobs to die. Watch and learn.

I have watched and learned. Since I graduated from high school, businesses have created fifty times more jobs under Democratic administrations than Republican administrations.


Republicans usually get voted into office when it's time to clean-up after the kids. Historically, Dems spend like crazy on social programs until they set up a recession for the republicans in office. Also, if by create jobs you mean creating government programs that invent administrative positions, then yes. And it's paid for with American's hard-earned tax dollars.

Not to mention, all of the regulations and taxes they create burden small business to the degree they close or struggle to exist. This hardly deserves a round of applause. Dems indirectly are the reason big business wins and small businesses fail. I know. Nuance is hard when you're willing to waste a vote on "joy."


You're either really dumb, or a troll.
This is exactly the opposite and you know it.
Obama came into office after the Bush recession. Biden came into office after the felon's recession.
This kind of idiocy might work with the MAGA types, but intelligent people know the facts.



I assume you believe you're intelligent. That's fine. America has a long history. The Obama-era is obviously not included and I will add he did a fantastic job as President. As far as the rest, no. Biden did not walk into a recession, nor are we in one now. There was a momentary dip in the markets during Trump, but that was Covid-related panic and temporary. Most people who invested during the Trump-era did well. Similar to the markets under Biden.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: