2024 Democratic National Convention

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harris is great.

All of the hate towards her is reminiscent of the Clinton hate. The smell of misogyny is strong!


Clinton had a platform and could give interviews solo.

That smell is coming from Harris, as her orange fingers clutch nervously at Walz’s sleeve. It’s fear.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harris is great.

All of the hate towards her is reminiscent of the Clinton hate. The smell of misogyny is strong!


Clinton had a platform and could give interviews solo.

That smell is coming from Harris, as her orange fingers clutch nervously at Walz’s sleeve. It’s fear.


haha, comparing Harris to Hillary is like comparing Trump to Obama. I mean, come on man.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.


Not saying I'm a fan of Cotton. I was actually expecting the video to show another faux complaint. But yes. The networks are letting Harris coast and showing their partisanship. It's no longer a rumor. It's out there in the wide open for all to see, which is unsettling.

Pardon me for not being comfortable with the networks deciding who should and shouldn't be president. That's supposed to be the role of voters.




+1

I don’t think Kamala is going to present a platform of her policies to America. She’s just going to say how joyful she is and promise that everything will be ok when she’s president.

She’s not going to sit for any interviews or hold any press conferences.

Democrats, who as a rule harp on and on about policy, are ignoring this and going a step further and saying it’s perfectly fantastic Kamala has no policy.

What a world.


She's gone polar opposite from Clinton. Clinton released a full, in-depth platform with details of changes she wanted to implement. And then the GOP started to attack it line-by-line and attacked every last detail. And she spent the majority of the time from the platform announcement to the election defending every other word. Clinton's message of how bad Trump was was completely swamped by the nitpicking. So, instead, Harris is going with the idea of not providing the GOP fodder to divert from Harris' message that she is not Trump. And that she will not allow the nation to be overwhelmed by the party of white supremacy, denying women's rights, antiSemites, and violent domestic terrorists that are supported by Trump.

The fact that she is NOT Trump is clearly strong enough to have her polling 3-5 points ahead of him.


Yes, I see no reason to change. Trump isn't a normal candidate and this isn't a normal election. I don't care if she puts out a 1,000 page policy. It's just fuel for the MAGAs to nitpick when their own ideas are non-existent or atrocious. I do love how this triggers them up though!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.


Not saying I'm a fan of Cotton. I was actually expecting the video to show another faux complaint. But yes. The networks are letting Harris coast and showing their partisanship. It's no longer a rumor. It's out there in the wide open for all to see, which is unsettling.

Pardon me for not being comfortable with the networks deciding who should and shouldn't be president. That's supposed to be the role of voters.




+1

I don’t think Kamala is going to present a platform of her policies to America. She’s just going to say how joyful she is and promise that everything will be ok when she’s president.

She’s not going to sit for any interviews or hold any press conferences.

Democrats, who as a rule harp on and on about policy, are ignoring this and going a step further and saying it’s perfectly fantastic Kamala has no policy.

What a world.


She's gone polar opposite from Clinton. Clinton released a full, in-depth platform with details of changes she wanted to implement. And then the GOP started to attack it line-by-line and attacked every last detail. And she spent the majority of the time from the platform announcement to the election defending every other word. Clinton's message of how bad Trump was was completely swamped by the nitpicking. So, instead, Harris is going with the idea of not providing the GOP fodder to divert from Harris' message that she is not Trump. And that she will not allow the nation to be overwhelmed by the party of white supremacy, denying women's rights, antiSemites, and violent domestic terrorists that are supported by Trump.

The fact that she is NOT Trump is clearly strong enough to have her polling 3-5 points ahead of him.


Yes, I see no reason to change. Trump isn't a normal candidate and this isn't a normal election. I don't care if she puts out a 1,000 page policy. It's just fuel for the MAGAs to nitpick when their own ideas are non-existent or atrocious. I do love how this triggers them up though!


A platform of plans and policies is expected. Kamala can’t even deliver that. And you excuse her ineptitude and incompetence by blaming MAGA. 🤡
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump watched her acceptance speech and had been seething over the weekend.

Of course the polls are showing him behind and he is pissed he’s a loser.

Of course he doesn’t want to debate. He’s a coward and chicken$hit.

He wants to change the rules because he looking stupid as usual.

Loser!


Pretty sure he’s already committed to a debate. Is there new info that he’s backing out?


No, he didn't like the way ABC gaslighted Tom Cotton in an interview, so made it know he can't trust the outlet will be an unbiased platform: https://nypost.com/2024/08/26/us-news/trump-considers-dropping-out-of-abc-news-debate-over-biased-interview-with-sen-tom-cotton/.

I watched out of curiosity and Jonathan Karl was a bit out of line. That said, Trump's still going.


Why do they have Tom Cotton on at all? He is 100% gaslighting phony. All these Republican Senators with elite educations who cosplay as populist Trump sycophants should be ignored.


Not saying I'm a fan of Cotton. I was actually expecting the video to show another faux complaint. But yes. The networks are letting Harris coast and showing their partisanship. It's no longer a rumor. It's out there in the wide open for all to see, which is unsettling.

Pardon me for not being comfortable with the networks deciding who should and shouldn't be president. That's supposed to be the role of voters.




+1

I don’t think Kamala is going to present a platform of her policies to America. She’s just going to say how joyful she is and promise that everything will be ok when she’s president.

She’s not going to sit for any interviews or hold any press conferences.

Democrats, who as a rule harp on and on about policy, are ignoring this and going a step further and saying it’s perfectly fantastic Kamala has no policy.

What a world.


She's gone polar opposite from Clinton. Clinton released a full, in-depth platform with details of changes she wanted to implement. And then the GOP started to attack it line-by-line and attacked every last detail. And she spent the majority of the time from the platform announcement to the election defending every other word. Clinton's message of how bad Trump was was completely swamped by the nitpicking. So, instead, Harris is going with the idea of not providing the GOP fodder to divert from Harris' message that she is not Trump. And that she will not allow the nation to be overwhelmed by the party of white supremacy, denying women's rights, antiSemites, and violent domestic terrorists that are supported by Trump.

The fact that she is NOT Trump is clearly strong enough to have her polling 3-5 points ahead of him.


Democrats attack Trump’s platform. They keep trying to insist Project 2025 is Trump’s platform instead the platform he released and said hey this is my actual platform.

Every excuse for Harris, always someone else’s fault.


Yes, so we have a well below average candidate in Harris vs the worst candidate in American history. Not a great choice but also not a difficult choice.


More on point- we have a candidate who has a platform and one who refuses or cannot release a platform, and that candidate can’t sit for a CNN interview without her male running mate.

You have a candidate that's a convicted felon, don't you? And a convicted rapist?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harris is great.

All of the hate towards her is reminiscent of the Clinton hate. The smell of misogyny is strong!


Clinton had a platform and could give interviews solo.

That smell is coming from Harris, as her orange fingers clutch nervously at Walz’s sleeve. It’s fear.


I just hears where the "joy" talking point came from. they made it up to cover for her repulsive cackling! so funny but so sad. I can't want until January when we have adults back in charge.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: