Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

"Russia can't lose in defensive positions"? I'll try to remember that line this winter.

Wasn't it spring first and then summer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

So the funny part is that either way you slice it (pre-Stalin / post-Stalin), Ukraine existed as either a State or self-governing authority - unlike Russia.

Moscow was ruled by and paid tribute to the Mongols for a few hundred years and was not the heart of the Russian Empire. Depending on the argument made, either Novogorod or Kiev is techncially the actual birthcity of the Rus empire.

Post-Stalin, Stalin's holodomor murdered millions in and around Ukraine through starvation when USSR troops denied food to starving people; providing the ability for Russians to re-populate Crimea, among other locations.

In other words, bad for Russian propaganda to reference maps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

So the funny part is that either way you slice it (pre-Stalin / post-Stalin), Ukraine existed as either a State or self-governing authority - unlike Russia.

Moscow was ruled by and paid tribute to the Mongols for a few hundred years and was not the heart of the Russian Empire. Depending on the argument made, either Novogorod or Kiev is techncially the actual birthcity of the Rus empire.

Post-Stalin, Stalin's holodomor murdered millions in and around Ukraine through starvation when USSR troops denied food to starving people; providing the ability for Russians to re-populate Crimea, among other locations.

In other words, bad for Russian propaganda to reference maps.

Maps won't lead you very far you know. Poland, Romania and Hungary may have a few things to say about that, wouldn't they? Is Ukraine on whatever map the same thing that exists today? Playing around with maps didn't do jack for Palestinians, for instance, or for Armenians who are currently content with a small rump state compared to what Greater Armenia once was.

You look at Kievan Rus and you see the Kievan part, others may see the Rus part. Does it really matter? What has the past glory ever done for the Cherokees, for instance? Things....shift. And rarely voluntarily!

I am continually amused by the effortless substitution of USSR/Russia when it works for people's arguments. Don't you think USSR troops included Ukrainians? I mean, for Stalin's crime, shouldn't you take it up with Georgia? Let alone an inconvenient fact that the famine killed nearly as many Kazakhs as it did Ukrainians yet Ukraine managed to make it all about themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

So the funny part is that either way you slice it (pre-Stalin / post-Stalin), Ukraine existed as either a State or self-governing authority - unlike Russia.

Moscow was ruled by and paid tribute to the Mongols for a few hundred years and was not the heart of the Russian Empire. Depending on the argument made, either Novogorod or Kiev is techncially the actual birthcity of the Rus empire.

Post-Stalin, Stalin's holodomor murdered millions in and around Ukraine through starvation when USSR troops denied food to starving people; providing the ability for Russians to re-populate Crimea, among other locations.

In other words, bad for Russian propaganda to reference maps.

LOL I love how five years ago most people here couldn't find Ukraine on a map. And now it's like everyone is a Ukraine expert and a Sovietologist and god knows what else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

So the funny part is that either way you slice it (pre-Stalin / post-Stalin), Ukraine existed as either a State or self-governing authority - unlike Russia.

You're going to have to elaborate on that for a bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

Do you describe Russia’s initial offensive as anything but anemic? How could they have possibly failed to capture Kyiv when this started? That’s when the West realized that the Russian military was a hollowed-out clown show and that it was worth arming the Ukrainians. How about their winter offensive? They rode Wagner’s prisoner meat shield strategy to take Bahkmut…anything else? It’s been a pathetic performance on their part overall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

No, DUMBASS - the POINT is that Ukraine has been around and has existed for hundreds of years. Anything to the contrary is lies and propaganda. And, Ukraine will continue to exist. Stop arguing, stop whining, and just come to terms with it already

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

Do you describe Russia’s initial offensive as anything but anemic? How could they have possibly failed to capture Kyiv when this started? That’s when the West realized that the Russian military was a hollowed-out clown show and that it was worth arming the Ukrainians. How about their winter offensive? They rode Wagner’s prisoner meat shield strategy to take Bahkmut…anything else? It’s been a pathetic performance on their part overall.

If it was a real clown show, Ukraine would have had no difficulty driving it back in toto. Yet a huge chunk of the country is either captured or devastated, and millions of their demographic assets are missing. You cannot possibly deny they did tremendous damage to the adversary. You may disagree with manner in which they did it, but the harm caused to Ukraine is in plain view. I mean why are you fundraising to defeat this so-called clown show? Should be easy, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How inconvenient that there were maps of a "country that didn't exist until it was created by Stalin" all the way back in 1660.



When the propaganda is so easily destroyed, it's time to stop using it.

When your most recent argument is from 1660, it's time to stop using it too.

No, DUMBASS - the POINT is that Ukraine has been around and has existed for hundreds of years. Anything to the contrary is lies and propaganda. And, Ukraine will continue to exist. Stop arguing, stop whining, and just come to terms with it already

LOL that's what they tell Israel all the time and see where it got them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

Do you describe Russia’s initial offensive as anything but anemic? How could they have possibly failed to capture Kyiv when this started? That’s when the West realized that the Russian military was a hollowed-out clown show and that it was worth arming the Ukrainians. How about their winter offensive? They rode Wagner’s prisoner meat shield strategy to take Bahkmut…anything else? It’s been a pathetic performance on their part overall.

If it was a real clown show, Ukraine would have had no difficulty driving it back in toto. Yet a huge chunk of the country is either captured or devastated, and millions of their demographic assets are missing. You cannot possibly deny they did tremendous damage to the adversary. You may disagree with manner in which they did it, but the harm caused to Ukraine is in plain view. I mean why are you fundraising to defeat this so-called clown show? Should be easy, no?

If they had a legitimate military, they could have taken Kyiv, limited collateral damage, and established rule. But they’re clowns so you know…they couldn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

They aren't even "playing defense" - the Ukrainian advance is accelerating, and the Russians keep losing territory. Ukraine has recaptured several towns in just the last few days alone. And, Russia faces an ever increasing number of strikes against military, intel and government targets well inside Russia's own borders, not just on key depots and bases deep inside territory they hold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

Do you describe Russia’s initial offensive as anything but anemic? How could they have possibly failed to capture Kyiv when this started? That’s when the West realized that the Russian military was a hollowed-out clown show and that it was worth arming the Ukrainians. How about their winter offensive? They rode Wagner’s prisoner meat shield strategy to take Bahkmut…anything else? It’s been a pathetic performance on their part overall.

If it was a real clown show, Ukraine would have had no difficulty driving it back in toto. Yet a huge chunk of the country is either captured or devastated, and millions of their demographic assets are missing. You cannot possibly deny they did tremendous damage to the adversary. You may disagree with manner in which they did it, but the harm caused to Ukraine is in plain view. I mean why are you fundraising to defeat this so-called clown show? Should be easy, no?

If they had a legitimate military, they could have taken Kyiv, limited collateral damage, and established rule. But they’re clowns so you know…they couldn’t.

That's just you making up rules about how you think wars ought to be fought. But there are a million ways to skin the cat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Russia defeated Napoleon and Hitler when everybody thought that they were finished and retreating. Never underestimate Russia.
The country on-track towards anarchy is Ukraine. Have you been there? I have. The level of destruction is unimaginable. It will take 50 years to rebuild that country once the war is over.
Ukraine's counteroffensive is failing badly. Zelensky would be wise to negotiate a settlement to end the war and preserve the territories they currently have under control, but more importantly to preserve the life of ten of thousands of Ukrainian people.

Napoleon, WTF are you talking about? How is that relevant at all? If anything, Russia and its crappy supply lines are playing the role of Napoleon in this war. Ukraine's counteroffensive is already far more successful than Russia's winter offensive. How many bodies did they throw away to level a town they've already lost?

It is relevant because Russia has now moved into a defensive position. Ukraine took the bait and started a counteroffensive that will prove to be a fatal mistake. Russia is stronger when they play defense. That's why Napoleon's war is relevant, so is Hitler's. Russia can't lose in defensive positions. It never has. Napoleon and Hitler know it too well. Zelensky will regret starting this counteroffensive. They will be crushed like many other that have tried.

?? Having a huge tactical advantage while playing defense is not uniquely Russian. It's why Russia's initial offensive was so pitifully anemic. Their supposed "second best army in the world" failed to capture (or even enter) the capital of its neighbor, who at the time, hadn't been truly geared up by the West. But Russia isn't playing defense at home. They're playing defense in occupied territory and will have to be supplied, refreshed, replenished, etc. That's where they'll fail and ultimately repeat their awesome Kharkiv defense. Unless by defense, do you mean running away with looted toilets?

LOL yet Ukraine still needs zillions bajillions dollars and ammo to fight the anemic offensive? I mean if the Russian army is as pitiful as you describe, why isn't Ukraine done with it?

Do you describe Russia’s initial offensive as anything but anemic? How could they have possibly failed to capture Kyiv when this started? That’s when the West realized that the Russian military was a hollowed-out clown show and that it was worth arming the Ukrainians. How about their winter offensive? They rode Wagner’s prisoner meat shield strategy to take Bahkmut…anything else? It’s been a pathetic performance on their part overall.

If it was a real clown show, Ukraine would have had no difficulty driving it back in toto. Yet a huge chunk of the country is either captured or devastated, and millions of their demographic assets are missing. You cannot possibly deny they did tremendous damage to the adversary. You may disagree with manner in which they did it, but the harm caused to Ukraine is in plain view. I mean why are you fundraising to defeat this so-called clown show? Should be easy, no?

If they had a legitimate military, they could have taken Kyiv, limited collateral damage, and established rule. But they’re clowns so you know…they couldn’t.

That's just you making up rules about how you think wars ought to be fought. But there are a million ways to skin the cat.

Haha, okay. They failed their military and political objectives and are now trying to hang onto their little land bridge (connecting up to an increasingly uninhabitable Crimea). Their military incompetence surprised the world, really.