The data the CDC used for that has been widely questioned by others. It included modeling studies from India based on their vaccines and a superspreader event involving lots of very, very close personal contact ideal for spreading any respiratory disease. |
Knowing that schools have to plan for full day, in person, 5 days a week, what would you like to see added into the plan? |
Who knows. She needs to call and ask to be let into the virtual program is she thinks delta makes in school unsafe now |
| Teacher here. I think they should require all staff and students to have a negative PCR 72 hours before school starts. I also think there should be weekly testing. Los Angeles is doing that and they are a lot larger. I think this would give hesitant parents some piece of mind. |
+1. I know all the lifestyle judgements around AIDS have made us hesitant to bring this up. But, I think the CDC is doing us all a disservice by not being clear on the context surrounding the Mass. data. That superspreader event was at a gay partying and hookup vacation destination. And a lot of the spread was sexual contact, not casual contact. There I said it. Not denying deltas is much more contagious, but using the Mass. super spreader event to extrapolate what would happen in K-12 schools isn’t helpful. And before people yell, by “lifestyle” I mean casual hookup culture, and not sexual orientation, which is not a lifestyle choice. I think the data from Mass is more concerning for kids returning to colleges with strong frat cultures. |
Those are very good points. I hadn’t thought about that. |
You are talking about 200,000 tests a week/ close to 1 million a month. That isn’t reasonable. My older kids SLAC did PCR testing. It picked up virtually no silent cases, and 0 silent outbreaks. And it only worked because you tested the second you hit campus, then 3 days later and quarantined until the second test was clear. So, for a total of a week. Then they had bubble, and all was well. You can’t bubble K12. I haven’t seen any data showing surveillance testing outside of bubbles does anything to slow the spread. |
The data on K-12 surveillance testing was that it was expensive and mostly false positives. I believe the data on symptomatic rapid testing at school is better. |
Another teacher here and I think that would do no good. Perfect example of what people call hygiene theater. |
Better start shopping for alternatives now, then. Of course, Delta will start waning by early/mid-September but not sure if that's good enough for you. |
| Also, I think the media is being extremely irresponsible in how they are reporting on the vaccinated populace vis a vis the Delta variant. Vaccines are still an effective life saving miracle that can keep spread in check; they are just not foolproof. You will notice that the pediatric hospitals filling up with COVID cases are in low vaccination parts of the country. |
That is not a helpful reply. I think vaccines and masks will be good protection against the Delta variant. |
Teacher here. Like I don’t have enough to do that I want to get a covid test. Also, aren’t you supposed to isolate when testing like this? So all teachers should give up their last weekend of summer? |
Delta is not a perma-wave. People are freaking out about it, but it's got a limited shelf life. Masks and vaccines are the tablestakes mitigation measures this year. Next year, probably just vaccines. |
Agree completely! I didn't know this context until yesterday. I feel like the logical takeaway should be, "We're still not at the point where a large, indoor, hook-up party among vaccinated and unvaccinated people is as safe as it used to be," not, "Mask up in the grocery store, where you likely won't have close and prolonged contact with anyone." While I don't think masking in public places is a big deal or infringement of my rights, and it certainly will prevent some spread, the real message should be about how we safely socialize. For instance, two unvaxxed kids playing legos together indoors while also eating snacks ... lots of air and potentially spit would be swapped, so not super safe. _That_ would be following the science, in my opinion. In terms of school, I think the context of the Mass. event is important. If kids can stay relatively spaced apart, and masked as much as possible, and have most of their close contact outdoors, it seems like we should be okay. Summer camps and summer schools are running without major outbreaks. I don't think we have a scenario equivalent to what school will look like to show that we should be more alarmed than previously (i.e., the Mass. event isn't an equivalent). In conclusion, these are scary times, and I am not immune from anxiety! These are our children, after all. But I do feel like we need to speak honestly and use some common sense. |