I went to grad school at Northwestern, and I have a hard time believing the undergrads there rank over the undergrads at Brown, Cornell or Johns Hopkins. The students seemed like regular bright, preprofessional students, not just one rung down from what I think of as Cal Tech or University of Chicago students. |
Agree. HYPSM Columbia Penn Caltech Duke Chicago Dartmouth Brown Cornell Johns Hopkins Northwestern Berkeley |
If Columbia were located in let’s say Newark, NJ do you think they would even be in the top 10? The biggest allure is NYC and that is undeniable. |
What's with all this nonsense Columbia bashing. It's pathetic and annoying. Even the Berkeley bashers took a more rational approach than them. Accept the facts: its acceptance rate is only beaten by Harvard, but they still lose in undergrad desirability as they have to use ED instead of SCEA. The "everyone applies because of NYC" thing is stupid, then every college in NYC would have a substantially lower acceptance rate, which is not true. The number of people who throw an application for Harvard just for giggles is probably greater. In undergrad desirability, it is below HYPSM, but above Penn and Chicago. Graduate programs are a whole different story. Law is top 4, med is top 4, business is part of the M7. No other school except Harvard and Stanford are better than Columbia in all three of these. They have the #1 international relations school and the #1 journalism school as well. For arts and sciences, it is only beaten by Harvard and Stanford again; for example, Columbia's STEM is way better than Yale's, but their humanities is inferior by a tiny bit. When speaking about the overall success of Columbia, it is only bested by Harvard and Stanford. Maybe MIT because their unrivaled STEM programs can outweigh the lack of other subjects. Maybe Berkeley because while their undergrad program has much left to be desired, Berkeley dominates in the graduate arts and sciences. But other than that, no other school can match the broad success that Columbia has achieved. |
But he did not choose it. That's the point. Many people would choose HYPSM over it when they come to a decision. There is reason for that. |
That's people's insecurity for fearing others would say HYPSM is better, not Columbia's insecurity. |
Stop deluding yourself..it’s direct peers are Chicago and Penn, and a good notch below HYPSM. |
Exactly |
HYPSM
Columbia Chicago Caltech Penn Duke Northwestern Dartmouth Brown Cornell Hopkins |
Most Columbia students I know are very insecure like Chicago students |
Good list |
Stop deluding yourself. Try looking at each graduate school ranking and departmental standings in a place like AWRU, that scientifically measures the success of these schools. Actually you can’t do that for Princeton because their law, medical, and business schools don’t even exist, and yet you say that Columbia is a “good notch below it!” Nonsense. |
Because of the lower undergraduate desirability compared to HYPSM, many Columbia's students are HYPSM rejects (otherwise they would have gone to HYPSM if given the choice), and Columbia knows it. That's why they can't do SCEA and has to use ED to lock students. Columbia having lower acceptance rate is because many more students applied to the school, probably thinking they had better chance to get into it than HYPSM because they thought Columbia would be easier. They were already self filtering from what they considered in their mind which one is more elite. |
I agree but Columbia College still a notch above Penn arts and science |
By that logic Berkeley > Columbia? |