Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

Perhaps check how you're raising your boy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) misogyny is alive and well in this country and B) victims of sexual assault are incredibly brave to speak out against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this woman and attempted to discredit her is really gross.

OR

Reading through some of these posts and reminded that A) feelings of jealousy and hatred of men are alive and well by many on this thread and B) victims of sexual assault accusations (not convictions) are incredibly brave to try to defend themselves against their attackers. The way some of the PPs have attacked this man (Kavanaugh) and attempted to discredit and convict him via one woman's accusations of attempted rape and suffocation after 30+ years is really gross.

MRA! MRA! MAGA!

How many victims will it take for you to believe, pp?

PP here. I"m female and not a Trump supporter; but I think it's wrong to accuse, condemn, and "convict" anyone of crimes as serious as attempted rape and suffocation (i.e., murder) based on one person's uncorroborated accusation after 30+ years.

Her accusation is corroborated. There are notes from her therapist on 2012, not to mention the polygraph. She also has a successful and very credible professional and personal track record. But it takes 50 women to corroborate accusations against one man, right?

No, it's not. All you say above is stuff her lawyer claimed. You have no idea if she took a polygraph, let alone passed it. You have no idea if there are notes. You are being TOLD those things, but you have not SEEN PROOF of those things.

Pretty sure that the WP reporter was given proof of all of this. It’s called fact-checking, something you may be unfamiliar with because it isn’t practiced by Fox or Breitbart.

Like NYT fact-checked the story about Nikki Hayley and the drapes? That kind of fact-checking?

+1
And let's not forget Rolling Stone's stellar job fact-checking the UVA non-story.

And didn't the NYT writer get a Pulitzer only to be exposed as a fake? Yep, great fact-checking there too.

Why speculate? Email the Post and ask what they saw.

Same poster, I assume you support the democrats request for an FBI investigation of the allegation because of your strong held belief in gathering all the evidence, right?

Bumping for response.

It was already answered, dummy. I stated that the dems had the right to ask and did and were shut down.

Thanks, proved my point that you don’t give two shits about evidence. Good night.

Checkmate. LOL. The Dems asked and were refused because the FBI felt there wasn't enough evidence for investigation. Sleep well.

When the facts don’t suit your argument, just make them up. Favorite tactic of conservatives.

Thr FBI said that the Kavanaugh investigation was closed but it can be reopened by White House request. Donnie and company refuse to do so.

So funny all these claims about evidence, and the same people are terrified of an investigation. Any innocent person would welcome the assistance of the FBI or frankly, any third party investigation.

Why should they on this type of loose allegation? Furthermore, we now know her research lies precisely in the area of false memories? Wasting taxpayer money on a memory where the person can't even remember the damn YEAR it happened? Do you honestly think if he was a man on the street and she was a woman and she went to a police station and told that story, that the police would open an investigation without even knowing the year it happened? No prosecutor would take the case because it's not viable. I'm sorry you think "I should be believed" is a viable reason, but you don't take a man's freedom away nor assess ANY penalties because you FEEL something.

What I'm hearing here is that she's a woman so she should be believed. I'm also hearing that white male frat boys suck and that no one is surprised. How very liberal of you

Good luck ladies! Keep accusing and destroying men on allegation, and all that's going to happen is no man is going to want to speak with you or touch you, for fear of being accused 20 years later and having their lives destroyed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

Perhaps check how you're raising your boy.

Don’t have boys, but good luck raising yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll make it to Monday. The republicans don't want to do it---not this close to the elections.

It's not going to be limited to he said/she said. They'll be able to grill him over his wild teenage and college and law school and clerkship drinking and partying. And I bet more people are coming forward with stories about him.

Go read Robert Costa's Twitter.

They will convince him to withdraw by Friday.

And the next guy. And the next one. And the next one. Who's acceptable. We, the democrats will pick the candidates for you.

[Anonymous]

The White House stands by their man
In the face of serious allegations of sexual assault, the White House is standing by Kavanaugh. They did so explicitly in a statement to Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html

The White House stood by that denial on Sunday in the wake of the Post's report.

“As the story notes, we are standing with Judge Kavanaugh’s denial," White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah told Fox News.

Trump is personally invested in the idea that women who allege sexual assault are liars. At least 14 women have accused Trump of sexual assault. He says they all are lying.

Three people "close to the White House," told Politico "they expect the president to go after Kavanaugh's accuser."

https://popular.info/p/the-education-of-bart-okavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

And this is why women are turning to each other for sex. Because they are driving all the men way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

Perhaps check how you're raising your boy.

Don’t have boys, but good luck raising yours.

Do you get the point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll make it to Monday. The republicans don't want to do it---not this close to the elections.

It's not going to be limited to he said/she said. They'll be able to grill him over his wild teenage and college and law school and clerkship drinking and partying. And I bet more people are coming forward with stories about him.

Go read Robert Costa's Twitter.

They will convince him to withdraw by Friday.

And the next guy. And the next one. And the next one. Who's acceptable. We, the democrats will pick the candidates for you.

Roberts, Gorusch, and Alito say hi. It’s Kavanaugh that is the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The White House stands by their man
In the face of serious allegations of sexual assault, the White House is standing by Kavanaugh. They did so explicitly in a statement to Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/16/california-professor-christine-ford-claims-kavanaugh-sexually-assaulted-her-it-derailed-me.html

The White House stood by that denial on Sunday in the wake of the Post's report.

“As the story notes, we are standing with Judge Kavanaugh’s denial," White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah told Fox News.

Trump is personally invested in the idea that women who allege sexual assault are liars. At least 14 women have accused Trump of sexual assault. He says they all are lying.

Three people "close to the White House," told Politico "they expect the president to go after Kavanaugh's accuser."

https://popular.info/p/the-education-of-bart-okavanaugh

I hope he does go after her. There needs to be no shadow of a doubt this actually happened. They should demand a new lie detector test by a neutral party at the very LEAST. You don't take the woman's lawyer at her word. That's just dumb. And oh, they need to look at the notes of the therapist as I bet you 10 bucks they don't say what this lawyer is saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

And this is why women are turning to each other for sex. Because they are driving all the men way.

Guessing Pride parades aren’t on your radar. Nor are real live women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll make it to Monday. The republicans don't want to do it---not this close to the elections.

It's not going to be limited to he said/she said. They'll be able to grill him over his wild teenage and college and law school and clerkship drinking and partying. And I bet more people are coming forward with stories about him.

Go read Robert Costa's Twitter.

They will convince him to withdraw by Friday.

And the next guy. And the next one. And the next one. Who's acceptable. We, the democrats will pick the candidates for you.

Roberts, Gorusch, and Alito say hi. It’s Kavanaugh that is the problem.

No, it's not. It's the fact that Trump is getting to nominate a second judge so soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

Perhaps check how you're raising your boy.

Don’t have boys, but good luck raising yours.

Do you get the point?

Don’t let boys sexually assault women (allegedly)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That sound you hear? Nervous sweat dripping off the wrinkled brows of every other white male over 45 in this area who treated women poorly in the 80s/90s and is now ensconced in a UMC life. Check those statutes of limitations, bros. Just not while your wives are hovering.

Perhaps check how you're raising your boy.

Don’t have boys, but good luck raising yours.

Do you get the point?

Don’t let boys sexually assault women (allegedly)?

Nobody LETS boys sexually assault women first of all.

I hope you are teaching your daughter not to put herself into a dangerous position either.

[Anonymous]

I think the Orange is subtly cutting Bart lose. What does the Orange care? Next right wing nerd judge up, please. They are fungible, pretty much like most lawyers.